Engine Experts?, hi res. FEMA photos |

Nov 26 2006, 05:06 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Polymeta.com search Sibel Edmonds bradblog Group: Library team Posts: 1,696 Joined: 15-October 06 Member No.: 77 |
Anyone able to tell from these FEMA shots about the airplane the engine came from?
hi res versions of the pics below: http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata/original/5473.jpg archive http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata/original/5474.jpg archive (IMG:http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata/low/5473.jpg) (IMG:http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata/low/5474.jpg) |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 5 2007, 11:07 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 430 Joined: 14-December 06 Member No.: 329 |
Dear MuhammedColumbo,
Ya know, I gotta show you a measure of respect on account of your own personal efforts at 'analysis' with respect to the Pentagon's 9-11 scene. So, since you are a very smart and bright sort of person, I want to share some thoughts of mine own with respect to your personal analysis of the Pentagon's 9-11 photo(s). I've worked on jet engines and aircraft since 1975. Removed, installed, troubleshot, repaired, built, tested so many jet engines that I no longer even what to service OIL TANKS on jet engines. I'm a "burned out" A&P. I've had the nasty experience of having a jet engine on its maintenance stand roll over my foot - and THANK GOD the trailer had pnuematic tires or I'd be minus a foot for the rest of my life. And I've been nearly crushed to death during an engine change on account of the wire cabling snapping on the removal/installation gear. I tell you these couple "war stories" in order to make you appreciate jet engines have significant WEIGHT on account of their having significant MASS. They are truly "substantial" things and are NOT 'weightless/mass-less' images simply seen by the human eye on photographs or in videos. In physics, there is this very simple equation that is rendered F=m x a, or if you prefer words "FORCE = mass times acceleration" The MORE mass you have being accelerated, or the MORE ACCELERATION you induce in any mass results in a MULTIPLICATION OF FORCE. Now a typical jet engine on virtually any commerical airliner WEIGHS IN at well over a TON - and most are now coming in at weights of TWO TONS and greater on account of their increased size and thrust ratings. I'm not about to quote you what a CFM56 weighs - I really don't care - but its somewheres in the ballpark of 4,000 lbs or two tons. Take 2 tons of metal and have it moving along at 500 miles per hour (which translates into a certain 'Feet per second' - and you can calculate the total amount of FORCE this engine can induce IF it strikes a stationary object. If you were to take a 10 pound sledge hammer and swing it a certain amount of 'feet per second', you've have a certain amount of FORCE which could be imparted into/onto some stationary object. If you took that amount of FORCE from the swinging of your 10 pound sledge hammer and DIVIDED IT INTO the total amount of FORCE contained in a 2 ton piece of metal travelling at 500 miles per hour, you'd come up with an APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF SWINGS OF YOUR SLEDGEHAMMER that would eventually equal the amount of FORCE imparted by your 2 ton jet engine going 500 mph hitting a stationary object. Now in your photograph, you show the red outline of a Boeing aircraft imposed onto the wall of the Pentagon. I want for you to LOOK AT the position of the RIGHT ENGINE's red silouhette and LOOK at what is contained in that engine's "Target". There is this CONCRETE PILLAR. If I could find about one hundred able bodied men who have the physical conditioning as the result of being CONSTRUCTION WORKERS - and let's say that it would take these 100 men swinging a 10 pound sledgehammer 100 times EACH to approximate the amount of TOTAL FORCE 2 tons of Jet Engine SledgeHammer Metal travelling at 500 mph - and I get these 100 construction workers to take 100 swings with a 10 pound sledge hammer into that SINGLE PILLAR you see pictured within the red silouhette of that airplane's right jet engine - do you think that you are going to see THAT pillar looking as good as it does??? I've seen TWO able bodied/physically conditioned construction workers make MINCE MEAT out of sidewalks and other sorts of masonry work using far fewer strokes of a hand held slegehammer. - tocarm - tocarm This post has been edited by tocarm: Jan 5 2007, 12:39 PM |
|
|
|
waterdancer Engine Experts? Nov 26 2006, 05:06 AM
waterdancer Airplane part?
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/p... Nov 26 2006, 05:29 AM
Merc GE engine components from WTC planes. Dec 8 2006, 10:26 PM
tocarm CF-6 engine. Powers 767s.
Each engine type has it... Dec 15 2006, 11:48 AM
Sanders What is that, the Pennsylvania site? Dec 15 2006, 12:04 PM
johndoeX QUOTE (tocarm @ Dec 15 2006, 10:48 AM)CF-6 en... Dec 15 2006, 02:48 PM
tocarm Dear Rob (Co-founder of Pilotsfor911truth.org),
A... Dec 15 2006, 07:02 PM
waterdancer QUOTE (Sanders @ Dec 15 2006, 04:04 PM)What i... Dec 15 2006, 11:20 PM
johndoeX tocarm.. you really need to call me. Please call a... Dec 15 2006, 11:36 PM
tocarm Dear Rob,
You wanted engine photos and engine mai... Dec 16 2006, 10:48 AM
johndoeX An excerpt from that site...
QUOTE The plane debr... Dec 16 2006, 03:58 PM
tocarm Dear Rob,
You asked for engine photos. Please uti... Dec 17 2006, 12:51 AM
johndoeX Wait a minute.. are you saying that AA77, N644AA, ... Dec 17 2006, 01:12 AM
johndoeX As i said. .i would like to get ahold of a JT8D-9A... Dec 17 2006, 01:15 AM
tocarm Dear Rob,
JT8-D pictures/illustrations? Nah, I ca... Dec 17 2006, 11:08 AM
johndoeX QUOTE (tocarm @ Dec 17 2006, 10:08 AM)Everybo... Dec 17 2006, 12:30 PM
driver QUOTE (tocarm @ Dec 17 2006, 04:51 AM)The typ... Dec 17 2006, 06:03 PM
driver http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NN...=0... Dec 17 2006, 06:05 PM
driver You can click on a link to a reported 2001 large p... Dec 17 2006, 06:09 PM
driver tocarm,
Keep an eye out for this future AD. I am ... Dec 17 2006, 06:20 PM
johndoeX Thanks for that article driver....
Im sure that t... Dec 17 2006, 06:55 PM
Merc Hey Tocarm!
Good to see you here finally... Dec 18 2006, 09:55 PM
tocarm Dear Driver,
Thanks for reading my posting(s). As... Dec 19 2006, 08:40 PM
tocarm Hi Merc!
It's kinda NICE to have a 9-11 w... Dec 19 2006, 08:54 PM
johndoeX Great post Joe... good to have you aboard...
Good... Dec 19 2006, 08:56 PM
driver QUOTE I hope people realize that when they make a ... Dec 19 2006, 10:32 PM
tocarm Dear Driver,
Regarding 'accuracy'...
How... Dec 20 2006, 12:40 PM
bill tocarm
that is thee best explaination of the even... Dec 20 2006, 02:01 PM
tocarm Dear Bill,
It's the Christian religous season... Dec 20 2006, 06:35 PM
bill I had not seen this before
but is corroberates y... Dec 21 2006, 10:12 AM
tocarm Dear Bill,
Thanks for reading my posts - and than... Dec 21 2006, 11:36 AM
UnderTow WoW, just got done reading your posts in here Toca... Dec 21 2006, 12:06 PM
bill QUOTE (tocarm @ Dec 21 2006, 03:36 PM)Dear Bi... Dec 22 2006, 09:56 AM
tocarm Dear Undertow,
I suppose (if you wanted to) you c... Dec 22 2006, 07:32 PM
waterdancer Just in case anyone is interested, the two New Yor... Dec 24 2006, 12:05 PM
johndoeX QUOTE (waterdancer @ Dec 24 2006, 11:05 AM)Ju... Dec 24 2006, 12:09 PM
tocarm Dear Rob,
Looks 'GE' to me -- the center ... Dec 25 2006, 10:38 AM
Wilbert N591UA: PW2040
N644AA: RB.211 SERIES
http://regis... Dec 27 2006, 06:10 PM
Cary Welcome to the forum Wilbert. Your link requires ... Dec 27 2006, 07:24 PM
skywatcher So can you conclude from the above that none of th... Dec 28 2006, 10:32 PM
skywatcher I cannot reconcile Waterdancer's info from NTS... Dec 28 2006, 11:55 PM
tocarm Dear Rob,
Regarding your concern that the engine ... Dec 29 2006, 11:45 AM
waterdancer QUOTE (skywatcher @ Dec 29 2006, 03:55 AM) I ... Dec 30 2006, 11:43 AM
johndoeX QUOTE (tocarm @ Dec 29 2006, 10:45 AM)Dear Ro... Dec 30 2006, 12:14 PM
tocarm Dear Rob,
Gotta clean up a little confusion here.... Dec 30 2006, 07:44 PM
muhammadcolumbo tocarm,
I am looking to identify the combustion c... Dec 30 2006, 07:46 PM
tocarm The photos of engine wreckage allegedly found at t... Dec 30 2006, 09:21 PM
johndoeX QUOTE (tocarm @ Dec 30 2006, 06:44 PM)Dear Ro... Dec 30 2006, 10:47 PM
waterdancer A somewhat bigger version of that same image is in... Dec 31 2006, 02:24 AM
skywatcher I don't want to confuse matters, but I want to... Dec 31 2006, 03:13 AM
waterdancer Skywatcher, it's not official, but I did find ... Dec 31 2006, 04:09 AM
tocarm Now I want for all of you to EXCUSE ME for posting... Dec 31 2006, 12:06 PM
muhammadcolumbo QUOTE (tocarm @ Dec 30 2006, 08:21 PM)The pho... Dec 31 2006, 06:16 PM
tocarm Dear Muhammadcolumbo,
I must confess that I'm... Jan 1 2007, 09:00 PM
muhammadcolumbo QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 1 2007, 08:00 PM)Dear Muh... Jan 2 2007, 06:29 PM
johndoeX RE: Engine Experts? Jan 2 2007, 07:00 PM
tocarm Dear MuhammedColumbo,
Alright...alright...let us ... Jan 2 2007, 07:40 PM
UnderTow I am in idiot at the moment becuase I don't ge... Jan 2 2007, 08:23 PM
tocarm Dear Undertow;
MuhammedColumbo is working on his ... Jan 2 2007, 08:48 PM
UnderTow No need to type beyond the obvious, I just wasn... Jan 2 2007, 09:14 PM
tocarm Dear Undertow,
Please understand that in no way I... Jan 2 2007, 09:39 PM
johndoeX QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 2 2007, 06:40 PM)Dear Muh... Jan 2 2007, 09:56 PM
tocarm Dear Rob,
I hope you do understand that I dont... Jan 2 2007, 11:49 PM
johndoeX QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 2 2007, 10:49 PM)I hope y... Jan 3 2007, 12:43 AM
tocarm 9-11 & The Pentagon
FACT: Some sort of 'f... Jan 3 2007, 12:54 AM
Cary QUOTE Shoot...why all of this 'Cloak & Dag... Jan 3 2007, 01:16 AM
tocarm Dear Cary,
Somebody fired off several psychology ... Jan 3 2007, 02:07 AM
muhammadcolumbo QUOTE (johndoeX @ Jan 2 2007, 06:00 PM)
johnd... Jan 3 2007, 01:36 PM
muhammadcolumbo QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 2 2007, 06:40 PM)Dear Muh... Jan 3 2007, 02:12 PM
muhammadcolumbo QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 3 2007, 01:07 AM)Dear Car... Jan 3 2007, 03:15 PM
tocarm Dear MuhammedColumbo,
Okay, so you're not an ... Jan 3 2007, 03:53 PM
UnderTow You guys are KILLING this thread...... Jan 3 2007, 03:54 PM
tocarm "Killing the thread..." Okay, let's ... Jan 3 2007, 05:42 PM
muhammadcolumbo tocarm,
Ok, I saw both web pages. But really I th... Jan 3 2007, 06:59 PM
johndoeX In order to identify those parts.. i think the fir... Jan 3 2007, 07:29 PM
tocarm I agree with Rob. This thread is a 'Dead End... Jan 3 2007, 08:25 PM
tocarm Now I got MY picture. See?
http://911research.wtc... Jan 4 2007, 11:59 AM
muhammadcolumbo QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 4 2007, 10:59 AM)...the w... Jan 4 2007, 03:37 PM
muhammadcolumbo QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 5 2007, 10:07 AM)I want f... Jan 5 2007, 02:17 PM
tocarm Sorry MuhammedColumbo...but I simply do not 'b... Jan 6 2007, 10:47 AM
johndoeX QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 6 2007, 09:47 AM)P.S. fin... Jan 6 2007, 11:16 AM
muhammadcolumbo tocarm,
Your comments are right and justified. Bu... Jan 6 2007, 11:49 AM
tocarm I know how 'near & dear' your attachme... Jan 6 2007, 12:08 PM
muhammadcolumbo QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 6 2007, 11:08 AM)I know h... Jan 6 2007, 03:03 PM
tocarm Dear MuhammedColumbo,
Ya gotta understand somethi... Jan 6 2007, 07:59 PM
Cary I don't understand all the details, but you... Jan 6 2007, 09:10 PM
tocarm Dear MuhammedColumbo,
Now then - BACK TO THE PENT... Jan 7 2007, 11:13 AM
muhammadcolumbo At first, my precedent posts has been removed, era... Jan 7 2007, 02:32 PM
johndoeX QUOTE (muhammadcolumbo @ Jan 7 2007, 01:32 PM... Jan 7 2007, 02:50 PM
muhammadcolumbo QUOTE (johndoeX @ Jan 7 2007, 01:50 PM)QUOTE ... Jan 7 2007, 03:47 PM
johndoeX Considering im working 16 hours a day on my resear... Jan 7 2007, 04:01 PM
johndoeX QUOTE (muhammadcolumbo @ Jan 7 2007, 01:32 PM... Jan 7 2007, 04:08 PM
muhammadcolumbo johndoeX,
When I told 100 eyewitnesses, I do not ... Jan 7 2007, 06:51 PM
tocarm Dear MuhammedColumbo,
It's virtually been YEA... Jan 7 2007, 07:14 PM
tocarm Dear MuhammedColumbo,
Amongst the many occupation... Jan 7 2007, 11:05 PM
johndoeX QUOTE (muhammadcolumbo @ Jan 7 2007, 05:51 PM... Jan 8 2007, 12:00 AM
johndoeX QUOTE (tocarm @ Jan 7 2007, 10:05 PM)With the... Jan 8 2007, 12:08 AM
johndoeX Joe, do you have that video of the Continental con... Jan 8 2007, 12:16 AM
tocarm Dear Rob,
About that contract Mx getting sucked i... Jan 8 2007, 01:16 AM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th June 2013 - 08:46 PM |