Engine Experts?, hi res. FEMA photos Options

[waterdancer]

Anyone able to tell from these FEMA shots about the airplane the engine came from?

hi res versions of the pics below:

http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata/original/5473.jpg archive
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata/original/5474.jpg archive

(IMG:http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata/low/5473.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata/low/5474.jpg)

[muhammadcolumbo]

johndoeX,

When I told 100 eyewitnesses, I do not mean exactly 100 people. I mainly means there are many people.

For the eyewitnesses, see that link :
911research.wtc7.net

All of them do not tell an AA aircraft. But most of them told that it was a civil aircraft. We can not expect more from common people. Most of them are unable to recognise a 737 from a 757. But if they saw the plane before the impact, they must be able to tell if it was a civil aircraft or a missile or a fighter jet. It's sure, some of them may have lied, but ce can not tell ALL HAVE LIED! Isn't it?

And the damage span is consistent with an aircraft of about 95 ft wingspan. That can not be a missile, or a smaller military aircraft. The damages also fit to an aircraft with wings under the fuselage and angines close to the wings.

I also think that there was a military C-130, as reported by officials and that the crew recognised the 757 of AA77! But I think that crew was member of the perpetrator team. That's why they also saw the UA93 before it crashes! Really unbeliavable! The same C-130 saw both 757s and that look natural, normal!

Ok, many of us told that it was a missile, an A-3, a military aircraft, ... I was also telling that at first. But when doing such investigation with almost no evidence (because all evidences are classified), it's natural that we make wrong claims at the beginning, like Meyssan did. When the investigation continue, it's normal that we find more evidences and better focus the truth.

I also think that Meyssan has big feeling when seeing the red-yellow color of the explosion and told there is an explosive! Yes the plane have an explosive on board.

I think, for our credibility, we must be able to say that our initial claim as "there was no aircraft" is wrong, and further investigation shows that there is a plane, but it's not a 757. And the ASCE report claiming that both wings extermities did no damage on the facade is WRONG."

I understand that accepting we were wrong in ONE point may be used as being wrong at all! But I prefer to be in the side of the truth and continue to tell the truth even if it's against our previous statements. Don't you think?

Please, take the time to read my power point presentation at http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/indexe.htm It will help for better understanding.

I think they are ALL right.. and you will find out why in Pandora's Black Box Chapter Two based on the information we have.

I didn't understand? Can you give me the link of that information.

This post has been edited by muhammadcolumbo: Jan 7 2007, 06:52 PM