A Missing Pole ? |
  |
A Missing Pole ? |
 Nov 30 2006, 06:21 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 388 Joined: 25-August 06 Member No.: 13  |
Now, in front of the impact site by the road, there is a two big tree. (about middle left in the photo)
To the right of the trees is a 1 lamp pole standing. (between the trees and the pole nr. 4 which was allegedly knocked down is 1 pole standing) (IMG:http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/jpg/size600/P200024-1.jpg) I want to see two poles like in this photo. (IMG:http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/028.jpg) This post has been edited by behind: Nov 30 2006, 07:18 PM |
 |
 
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 06:34 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 06:42 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 388 Joined: 25-August 06 Member No.: 13 |
Yes... I know that the photo is not very clear... but I can see all other poles in it... and the first photo is from the moussaoui trial.
But someone will maybe say: What kind of detail is that ? And yes maybe... but to me it is pretty strange (at this point) |
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 07:55 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 802 Joined: 20-October 06 Member No.: 117 |
I think they're careful about releasing some photos that are too detailed for the reason that we may notice such anomalies.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 07:58 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 802 Joined: 20-October 06 Member No.: 117 |
It looks as though the missing pole may be laying on the ground, but the resolution is too low to say for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2006, 03:12 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Polymeta.com search Sibel Edmonds bradblog Group: Library team Posts: 1,696 Joined: 15-October 06 Member No.: 77 |
Higher res. version below. I think I might see it in that one... if you draw a horizontal line across towards the pentagon from the top of the overhead road sign, I think that's where it is. At least there seems to be something vertical there.
higher res. versions of the rest of them can be found on this page, FYI. http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/ (IMG:http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/jpg/P200024-1.jpg) This post has been edited by waterdancer: Dec 1 2006, 03:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2006, 04:05 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 432 Joined: 14-August 06 From: california Member No.: 3 |
is it just me...or does the "video" released when compared to theis picture make the idea a F**KING 757 hit the pentagon rediculous?!?!?!
(IMG:http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/jpg/size600/P200024-1.jpg) This post has been edited by THE_DECIDER: Dec 1 2006, 04:10 AM |
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2006, 06:29 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 127 Joined: 24-October 06 Member No.: 155 |
erm, not sure what you mean... i can see 2 poles knocked down in both photos ?
and the pole u described in the top pic is ment to be standing ? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2006, 06:51 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 127 Joined: 24-October 06 Member No.: 155 |
ok i think i know what ur talking about now - and er... well, im either making my eyes go funny looking at it for too long, or... something does seem odd.. ill try explain
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2006, 07:16 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 127 Joined: 24-October 06 Member No.: 155 |
ok here goes (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
we can definatly see 2 lightpoles here, i think its obvious: (IMG:http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/4177/1jw7.jpg) ok, the next images... we can see its ruffly shot around the same time, as ive highlighted different features - but we can't see the 2nd pole ? (IMG:http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/2917/2dj8.jpg) so, lets look at the high res.. where the pole should be somewhere in the region: (IMG:http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/6328/3dv8.jpg) now, maybe its just my eyes (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) but it definatly looks a little more "boxy" round that area, does any else see it ? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif) This post has been edited by Drakey: Dec 1 2006, 07:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2006, 07:30 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 127 Joined: 24-October 06 Member No.: 155 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2006, 09:33 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 388 Joined: 25-August 06 Member No.: 13 |
QUOTE (Drakey @ Dec 1 2006, 11:16 AM) ... now, maybe its just my eyes (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) but it definatly looks a little more "boxy" round that area, does any else see it ? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif) ... Ok. thank you. You zoomed it up. And yes... it looks maybe a little "boxy" round that area. ... but I can see no reason for why the pole should not be in the photo. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2006, 09:48 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 127 Joined: 24-October 06 Member No.: 155 |
yea, i did zoom it to 200%.. which may cause it - but its wierd how its more or less where the pole should be, but even with this lil assumption - there needs to be a pole there or it should have been reported that it was also knocked over/taken down surely
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 11:20 PM |
