911 Commission Transcripts..., Need to read them... Options

[Robin Hordon]

Somewhere on this site I think that I ended up being linked to some 911 "Omission", or perhaps earlier transcrits or statements from the NEADS/NORAD guys giving testimony. Kinda thought it might be surrounding the "phantom" AA11 as it was headed south on a ghostly path. Somebody with lotso info hooked me up to what I really need to reread.

If it was anyone reading this post, or, if anyone else has a link to the 911 "ommission" transcripts covering the military testimony, can you steer me there. This is an important project to debunk some timelines and the like...

Thanks,

Love, Peace and Progress...

Robin Hordon

[Robin Hordon]

JackD,

Look at a "track" as being a yellow "post-it" with "some" of the airplanes' important information written on it...IE: flight number, assigned and reported altitude, ground speed, and a computer ID number [for atc use]. And the look at it as though after each radar "swep", a controller picks the post-it up from the scope and places it at the NEW location where the associated aircraft is seen by the REAL radar blip. So, if you can see how the controller-post-it combination can keep the identity of that TARGET constant as it moves across the radar scope, then step ahead into the following:

Replace the post-it with an alpha-nuemeric data block created SOLELY by the programming within the ATC computer...and replace the controller "moving" the data block with the SAME computer program that has a capacity to "search for" a certain transponder code-OR-a primary target...and when finding such a target...will then instruct the computer to RE-LOCATE the TRACK to the exact place that the RADAR part of the RDP [radar data processing] system...the BLIP...has been found.

So, the TRACK is computer generated...the TARGET is AIRCRAFT generated, but shown in several ways...

The TRACK has a certain "momentum" that it uses to project "where" to search for ITS target...and it is a computer generated "vector" that helps the computer look for and MOVE the alpha-nuemeric data block to where the TARGET is most likely to be at the NEXT radar sweep...when it finds the target...it moves the TRACK to that EXACT point where the target has been seen.

NOW...IF...there is no longer a TARGET 'seen" at this new "predicted" location based upon the vector speed and direction of the last two "hits" of the TARGET...[as generated by the track's previous movements ALONG WITH the TARGET...]...

THEN...the computer generated ALPHA-NUEMERIC DATA TRACK...CONTINUES ON ITS LAST HEADING AND SPEED until it either, picks up a "target" somewhere that it still is "looking for", or until a controller cancels the track in the computer.

AND..when the track is "SEARCHING FOR A TARGET", but cannot find one, the track goes into COAST MODE...that means that the track will still "move along" according to the LAST TWO headings and speeds registered by the REAL TARGET...I say again..the REAL TARGET. The TRACK will go on this way FOREVER...

At this time, the COAST MODE of the track is indicated to the controllers by a small # sign that is located where the TARGET used to be.

So, PLEASE LISTEN TO THIS...

...EVERYONE...the FAA controllers, the Secret Service, the FAA HQ, the military who have access to the FAA Command Center displays, and...what I used to call "Central Flow Control...which I guess is now the TMU...Traffic Management Unit, has the capacity to watch all of the......................

TRACKS of aircraft within US airspace....

It has nothing to do with.........................

the TARGETS within the US airspace...

Therefore, those who said that AA11 was still airbourne were lying because the TRACK...for AA11...had LOST its....

TARGET back on Mnhattan....

AND... the TRAGETLESS TRACK...continued on southbound...with the COAST MODE # sign where the target was supposed to be...IF there were one...which there wasn't!!!!

ANYONE who knew ANYTHING about alpha nuemeric TRACKS...knew that there was no target...because AA11's TRACK had been in COAST MODE for tens of miles...and it showed this it in the data block...since Manhattan...

So, they INVENTED the idea that AA11 was still airbourne because they SAW a TRACK with AA11's info on it...but there was no target...

The AA11 "still airborne invention" was needed by the military to justify scrambling Langley fighters because they had to claim that they were never informed that AA77 was hijacked...meaning that they were building an excuse to explain WHY the "alleged" AA77 TARGET [not tracked] was not shot down because Langley was scrambled in plenty of time to do it...

So, AA11's COAST TRACK came in handy to get the military off the hook...for now.

A TRACK is one thing...alll computer generated...
A TARGET is another thing...its a blip from RAW radar that is sometimes dressed up a bit as a plain or fancy "blip" on the radar screens...

TRACK-TARGET...not the same!

Love, Peace and Progress...

Robin Hordon