The Gate 26/32 question, Where did AA 11 departure? |

Aug 29 2006, 04:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Woody Box Group: Valued Member Posts: 236 Joined: 28-August 06 Member No.: 20 |
Some of you may know that there are conflicting accounts regarding the departure gate of AA 11. Some sources say it was Gate 26, some say Gate 32.
I gathered the evidence here (my first 9/11 piece): http://de.geocities.com/woody_box2000/TwinFlight.html The 9/11 Commission Report was published half a year later and presented - in my eyes - confirmation for the oddities at Logan Airport. F.I. in the footnotes we learn that some of the passengers of Flight 11 boarded the plane after the push-back! Can any aviation expert tell me how this is possible? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) QUOTE 9. See TSA report, "Selectee Status of September 11th Hijackers," undated. For boarding and seating information, see AAL record, SABRE information on Flight 11, Sept. 11, 2001.These boarding times from the American system are approximate only; for Flight 11, they indicated that some passengers "boarded" after the aircraft had pushed back from the gate. See AAL response to the Commission's February 3, 2004, requests, Mar. 15, 2004. Chapter I, note 9 But there's more, even better: QUOTE 6. For Flight 11, two checkpoints provided access to the gate. The second was opened at 7:15 A.M. The FAA conducted many screener evaluations between September 11, 1999, and September 11, 2001.At the primary checkpoints, in aggregate, screeners met or exceeded the average for overall, physical search, and X-ray detection, while falling below the norm for metal detection. No FAA Special Assessments (by "red teams") were done at Logan security checkpoints during the two years prior to September 11, 2001. See FAA briefing materials, "Assessment and Testing Data for BOS, EWR, and IAD," Oct. 24, 2001. Chapter I, Note 6 I was wondering why two checkpoints provide access to one gate. I always thought one checkpoint provides access to multiple gates. Loose Change member JackD has provided me with a nice map of the AA Terminal at Logan: http://i.elias-savion.com/11/59/en-us/docu...boston_b_aa.pdf Obviously, there is only one security checkpoint for Gate 32 (the gate favoured by the 9/11 Commission). But - and this is interesting - Gate 26 has to be entered through a different checkpoint. Is that what the 9/11 Commission means? One checkpoint for each gate? But why don't they mention gate 26, and which of the planes was Flight 11, anyway? Do multiple checkpoints for one gate make sense at all? Anyone here familiar with Logan Airport? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 28 2011, 03:39 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 154 Joined: 1-March 07 From: Indiana Member No.: 711 |
For those that missed the History Common's entry on Mr. Ogonowski....
QUOTE John A. Ogonowski, was born in Lowell, Massachusetts in 1951. John had a BS Degree in Nuclear Engineering and was an avid farmer. He had worked with the former Deputy Secretary of Agriculture, Gus Schumacher, to secure a plot of 150 acres of farmland on Marsh Hill Road in Dracut, through the APR Program.He was a pilot in the United States Air Force achieving rank of captain. He was a Vietnam veteran who went to pilot train-ing in Texas and was then assigned to Charleston AFBSC where he flew C-141. Captain John A. Ogonowski was a mem-ber of the Allied Pilot Association, and flew a Boeing 767 aircraft for American Airlines for 23 years. John was an active member in the Dracut Historical Society Board of Directors for the Massachusetts Farm Bureau, and the Board of Direc-tors for the Dracut Land Trust, Inc. http://www.umass.edu/fruitadvisor/berrynotes/bn1713.htm QUOTE Twelve days a month, Mr. Ogonowski, 50, flew transcontinental flights. On off days, he tended the farm's peach orchard, with acres set aside for corn, pumpkins and hay. After supper he often sat in his favorite chair, reading agricultural journals late into the evening. Mr. Ogonowski joined the Air Force at the height of the Vietnam War. He flew C-141 transport planes, taking equipment to Asia, and sometimes flying back to the States carrying the bodies of American soldiers. He became a commercial pilot in 1979, and met a pretty flight attendant named Peggy, whom he later married. The morning of Sept. 11, he left his wife at home, still in bed. It was already dawn as he turned down the road in his dusty green Chevy truck, to start his drive to Boston and to Logan International Airport. As he passed his uncle's nearby house, he tooted his horn. Mr. Ogonowski was the captain of Flight 11, the first plane to crash into the World Trade Center. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/03/national...3OGONOWSKI.html Conflicting Reports-In this description, John DID NOT want to fly that day- QUOTE Ogonowski Legacy TOOMEY: Last year we aired a story about a non-profit project that helps Southeast Asian refugees return to farming. One of the project's mentor farmers was the owner of White Gate Farm in Dracut, Massachusetts. His name was John Ogonowski. But he also had another job. He was a pilot for American Airlines. And on September 11th it was his plane, Flight 11, that struck the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Since that day, those involved in the farmer program say the work has been harder without John Ogonowski. But as Sean Cole of member station WBUR reports, they're determined to continue the project as a legacy to him. COLE: John Ogonowski didn’t want to fly on September 11th. That was the day people were coming to tour the dozen acres of Asian crops flourishing amid the hay and pumpkins at White Gate Farm. Ogonowski and his wife, Peggy, had hosted such events before, and he told project director Hugh Joseph he would do his best to be around for this one. JOSEPH (Ogonowski): Finally, I got a call the night before from Peggy saying, ‘Listen, John’s not back yet, but he got the final word that he has to fly tomorrow. [b]He can’t switch.[/b]’ [size="1"][/size]http://www.loe.org/shows/shows.htm?programID=02-P13-00037 And yet in this account, John DOES want to fly, QUOTE Georgetown Record reported: "American Airlines Captain Walter Sorenson of Groveland was scheduled to fly Flight #11 on Sept. 11, 2001. He was disappointed when he was replaced by Captain John Ogonowski, who had seniority over Sorenson and requested to fly that day. ... The last-minute change of pilots ... spared Sorenson's wife Sarah the untimely loss of a young husband." Interesting to note that according to the Cole interview with John's family members...Joe, John's brother, is a full timer in the Air National Guard.... QUOTE Jim Ogonowski, John’s brother, says it’s all he can do to keep the hay business in operation while maintaining his full-time job at the Air National Guard.
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2011, 04:01 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 46 Joined: 15-February 11 Member No.: 5,658 |
The morning of Sept. 11, he left his wife at home, still in bed. It was already dawn as he turned down the road in his dusty green Chevy truck, to start his drive to Boston and to Logan International Airport. As he passed his uncle's nearby house, he tooted his horn. Mr. Ogonowski was the captain of Flight 11, the first plane to crash into the World Trade Center. NY Times, December 3, 2001 Great. I guess this was the report Woody was talking about above. Now we can definitely conclude that John Ogonowski was not at the controls of Flight 198 coming from SFO on 9/11. |
|
|
|
Mar 13 2011, 08:54 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 15 Joined: 6-March 11 Member No.: 5,711 |
Here are some facts I uncovered about Flight 11 in my recent book:
Der Spiegel magazine wrote that eyewitnesses recalled passengers waiting near Gate 26 around 7:30 AM Gate 26 was likely too far for passengers to get to in 15 minutes for the supposed take-off at 7:45 AM at Gate 32. Gate 19 was close enough for these passengers to get to for a later flight (Flight 175) Flight 11 was only sighted by the pilot of...Flight 175! The debris at the World Trade Center has never been matched to Flight 11. |
|
|
|
Mar 17 2011, 12:10 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 289 Joined: 13-November 06 Member No.: 238 |
Here are some facts I uncovered about Flight 11 in my recent book: Der Spiegel magazine wrote that eyewitnesses recalled passengers waiting near Gate 26 around 7:30 AM Gate 26 was likely too far for passengers to get to in 15 minutes for the supposed take-off at 7:45 AM at Gate 32. Gate 19 was close enough for these passengers to get to for a later flight (Flight 175) Flight 11 was only sighted by the pilot of...Flight 175! The debris at the World Trade Center has never been matched to Flight 11. Great to hear about book. Gate 26 and 32 are not terribly far apart in terminal B, unless numbering has been changed in last 10 years. It is important to note your assertion "No debris from WTC matched to AA11 N334AA" -- which should raise eyebrows. Still, the plane and alleged passengers are indeed gone -- and the mystery of which persons in fact did board AA11 is still unclear. http://www.aa.com/i18n/aboutUs/whereWeFly/...erminal_BOS.jsp |
|
|
|
Mar 17 2011, 04:22 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 15 Joined: 6-March 11 Member No.: 5,711 |
Thank you, Jack.
The distance between Gates 26 and 32 is only part of the issue. The other part is how 69 passengers (and 9 crewmembers) could get from Gate 26 at 7:30 AM to Gate 32 and be completely seated on the plane for the take-off at 7:45 AM without attracting much attention. Like the question of how Lee Harvey Oswald could have gotten from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository Building to the second floor in about ninety seconds, the “trier of fact” (us) must consider the details involved along the way. In the case at hand, it is hard to figure how so many people could hurry through the airport in such a short period of time when in all likelihood the people would all move at different speeds, there would be plenty of people in the way, the plane at Gate 32 would have to be ready to go, etc. As for where the Flight 11 passengers went, I present ideas in my book. When I have made enough posts, I am considering starting a new topic for that. Great to hear about book.
Gate 26 and 32 are not terribly far apart in terminal B, unless numbering has been changed in last 10 years. It is important to note your assertion "No debris from WTC matched to AA11 N334AA" -- which should raise eyebrows. Still, the plane and alleged passengers are indeed gone -- and the mystery of which persons in fact did board AA11 is still unclear. http://www.aa.com/i18n/aboutUs/whereWeFly/...erminal_BOS.jsp |
|
|
|
Mar 17 2011, 07:59 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 27 Joined: 10-February 11 Member No.: 5,642 |
Thank you, Jack. The distance between Gates 26 and 32 is only part of the issue. The other part is how 69 passengers (and 9 crewmembers) could get from Gate 26 at 7:30 AM to Gate 32 and be completely seated on the plane for the take-off at 7:45 AM without attracting much attention. Like the question of how Lee Harvey Oswald could have gotten from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository Building to the second floor in about ninety seconds, the “trier of fact” (us) must consider the details involved along the way. In the case at hand, it is hard to figure how so many people could hurry through the airport in such a short period of time when in all likelihood the people would all move at different speeds, there would be plenty of people in the way, the plane at Gate 32 would have to be ready to go, etc. As for where the Flight 11 passengers went, I present ideas in my book. When I have made enough posts, I am considering starting a new topic for that. I am hoping to read comments from Woody on these posts. He has spoken to eyewitnesses who were at the terminal. |
|
|
|
woody The Gate 26/32 question Aug 29 2006, 04:05 PM
StevenDC QUOTE (woody @ Aug 29 2006, 03:05 PM)Some of ... Jan 16 2007, 06:59 PM
v2rot8 The only thing I can think of is that Flt. 11 was ... Jan 16 2007, 07:13 PM
JackD Woody, and V2Rotator --
Logan Airport's term... Jan 18 2007, 02:11 PM
JackD more information about Terminal B in Logan
North ... Jan 18 2007, 02:21 PM
amazed! Wow, fascinating stuff!
The discrepancies bet... Jan 20 2007, 11:56 AM
JackD hard to conclude much about where passengers went.... Jan 23 2007, 06:32 PM
amazed! Jack
That's my point. If the pax are missing... Jan 29 2007, 10:36 PM
JackD many passengers on AA11 worked for for industries ... Jun 5 2007, 09:45 PM
Beached QUOTE (JackD @ Jun 6 2007, 01:45 AM)many pass... Jun 6 2007, 08:14 AM
amazed! As time goes on, I now think that either none of t... Jun 8 2007, 09:49 AM
radiofreebc This is really interesting. Is there any proof of... Sep 5 2007, 05:50 AM
Zapzarap @Beached
very plausible analysis again! Makes ... Sep 5 2007, 08:48 AM
woody A new entry on my blog since months:
http://911wo... Sep 17 2010, 03:43 PM
amazed! Thanks for that Woody!
As I recall there ... Sep 18 2010, 04:56 PM
DANDPT RE: chapter 6 of the Fetzer book, The 9/11 Conspir... Feb 10 2011, 09:05 PM
elreb QUOTE (DANDPT @ Feb 10 2011, 03:05 PM) RE... Feb 11 2011, 12:02 PM
DANDPT QUOTE (elreb @ Feb 11 2011, 12:02 PM) 001... Feb 13 2011, 06:31 PM
DANDPT QUOTE (elreb @ Feb 11 2011, 12:02 PM) 001... Feb 13 2011, 06:57 PM

elreb QUOTE (DANDPT @ Feb 13 2011, 12:57 PM) I... Feb 13 2011, 08:34 PM


DANDPT QUOTE (elreb @ Feb 13 2011, 07:34 PM) Try... Feb 13 2011, 09:00 PM


woody QUOTE (DANDPT @ Feb 14 2011, 01:00 AM) Di... Feb 15 2011, 10:58 AM


DANDPT QUOTE (woody @ Feb 15 2011, 10:58 AM) I... Feb 15 2011, 12:47 PM


elreb QUOTE (DANDPT @ Feb 15 2011, 06:47 AM) Re... Feb 15 2011, 02:03 PM


woody QUOTE (DANDPT @ Feb 15 2011, 05:47 PM) I ... Feb 20 2011, 11:52 AM


Sergio QUOTE (woody @ Feb 20 2011, 01:52 PM) Whe... Feb 20 2011, 02:30 PM



woody QUOTE (Sergio @ Feb 20 2011, 07:30 PM) Hi... Feb 22 2011, 02:46 PM



Sergio Hi Woody, first of all thank you very much you for... Feb 23 2011, 10:40 AM



woody QUOTE (Sergio @ Feb 23 2011, 03:40 PM) Hi... Feb 25 2011, 10:04 AM



Sergio QUOTE (woody @ Feb 25 2011, 11:04 AM) Reg... Feb 25 2011, 03:24 PM


DANDPT QUOTE (woody @ Feb 20 2011, 10:52 AM) Whe... Feb 21 2011, 01:19 PM


DANDPT I got the idea that AA11 was not scheduled on Tues... Feb 21 2011, 03:00 PM


SwingDangler QUOTE (DANDPT @ Feb 19 2011, 06:00 PM) I ... Feb 28 2011, 02:13 PM

paranoia QUOTE (DANDPT @ Feb 13 2011, 05:57 PM) No... Feb 13 2011, 08:41 PM

Obwon QUOTE (DANDPT @ Feb 13 2011, 05:57 PM) Th... Mar 20 2011, 06:52 PM
tumetuestumefaisdubien QUOTE (elreb @ Feb 11 2011, 04:02 AM) 001... Feb 28 2011, 02:21 AM
Sergio QUOTE (tumetuestumefaisdubien @ Feb 28 2011, ... Feb 28 2011, 09:56 AM
elreb From my perspective this was a military exercise d... Feb 13 2011, 10:41 PM
DANDPT QUOTE (elreb @ Feb 13 2011, 10:41 PM) Fro... Feb 14 2011, 12:37 PM
elreb I wouldn’t think it would be difficult to bury or ... Feb 14 2011, 01:15 PM
DANDPT QUOTE (elreb @ Feb 14 2011, 01:15 PM) I w... Feb 14 2011, 07:37 PM
amazed! Probably about 4 or 5 years ago, maybe here at PFT... Feb 14 2011, 06:16 PM
elreb Where is the DNA...where are the bodies... Feb 14 2011, 09:17 PM
DANDPT QUOTE (elreb @ Feb 14 2011, 09:17 PM) Whe... Feb 14 2011, 09:54 PM
elreb You can roll the bones anyway you want…witness pro... Feb 14 2011, 11:03 PM
amazed! Thanks Woody! Feb 16 2011, 11:12 PM
elreb QUOTE (amazed! @ Feb 16 2011, 05:12 P... Feb 16 2011, 11:30 PM
amazed! Sorry if I missed it Woody, but is Sorensen still ... Feb 20 2011, 10:27 PM
elreb QUOTE (amazed! @ Feb 20 2011, 04:27 P... Feb 20 2011, 11:06 PM

Sergio QUOTE (elreb @ Feb 21 2011, 12:06 AM) My ... Feb 21 2011, 01:54 PM
woody QUOTE (amazed! @ Feb 21 2011, 03:27 A... Feb 22 2011, 02:51 PM
elreb Great self-research…wonder if you could look up AA... Feb 21 2011, 06:07 PM
elreb Woody Box,
I am sure you are one of the best rese... Feb 22 2011, 11:30 PM
amazed! The entire frigging story is a lie, from start to ... Feb 24 2011, 10:20 PM
woody QUOTE (Sergio @ Feb 28 2011, 08:01 PM) Gr... Apr 25 2011, 02:43 AM
Sergio QUOTE (woody @ Apr 25 2011, 03:43 AM) New... Apr 27 2011, 07:51 PM
amazed! I agree Obwon--they've been generating identit... Mar 21 2011, 11:01 AM
Obwon QUOTE (amazed! @ Mar 21 2011, 10:01 A... Mar 23 2011, 05:14 AM
DANDPT QUOTE (Obwon @ Mar 23 2011, 05:14 AM) Of ... Mar 23 2011, 12:05 PM
Obwon QUOTE (DANDPT @ Mar 23 2011, 11:05 AM) An... Mar 24 2011, 07:17 AM
DANDPT QUOTE (Obwon @ Mar 24 2011, 07:17 AM) Tha... Mar 24 2011, 12:10 PM
Sergio QUOTE (DANDPT @ Mar 24 2011, 01:10 PM) Di... Mar 24 2011, 02:50 PM

DANDPT QUOTE (Sergio @ Mar 24 2011, 02:50 PM) Ma... Mar 24 2011, 07:41 PM

Sergio Wait Dan, wait.
QUOTE (DANDPT @ Mar 24 2011... Mar 25 2011, 12:15 PM

Obwon QUOTE (DANDPT @ Mar 24 2011, 06:41 PM) Se... Mar 26 2011, 12:11 PM
Obwon QUOTE (DANDPT @ Mar 24 2011, 11:10 AM) OB... Mar 26 2011, 12:00 PM
amazed! Thanks for the latest stuff Woody! Apr 25 2011, 05:12 PM
9/11 Justice Now This should prove to be very interesting "oh ... Jun 2 2011, 12:08 PM
amazed! The link does not work for me. Jun 2 2011, 09:39 PM
9/11 Justice Now QUOTE (amazed! @ Jun 3 2011, 11:39 AM... Jun 2 2011, 10:54 PM
amazed! Read the article quickly. Assuming that it's ... Jun 4 2011, 09:46 AM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 02:35 AM |