Famous "diagonal Cut Column", Metalsmith analysis Options

[astronut]

Hi,
first, I'd like to suggest the Pilots Forum to combine WTC 1 and 2 Forums. Many of the posted topics in each room pertain to both buildings. More than the pertain to a single building. It would be easier to know where to post if even all WTC posts were in just one room. So, not knowing which room to post this to, I chose WTC 1.

With 5 years aviation and 25 years metal fabrication under my belt, I have written a paper that analyzes this famous photo. It also scrutinizes a photo used recently by "debunkers" when in fact, when looked at correctly, it supports the case for thermate at WTC.

This paper leads to another regarding the USGS thermal images from Sept 16th and 23rd, 2001. I'm looking for as much feedback as possible on this before submitting to the various research sites for inclusion.

http://www.centralmass911truth.org/diagonalcolumncut.html

Thanks, Larry

[Maha Mantra]

I've never seen any forms being used for making a concrete core in any photos or videos of the towers.
Photos of the core columns show no concrete walls near them.

The angle cut in question appears to have been accessible from all sides, so why cut a hole and cut the near side from within the column ? Why not cut the near side across first and then get along with the bizarre angle cutting on the sides ?

The mentioning of putting guides inside the tube and even on the outside doesn't make a lot of sense in the case of demolition since, one, putting guides inside is kind of hard isn't it ? And the cuts don't have to be straight.

I appreciate the insight that yes it could be done that way with a torch, although you'd need one with a tip that isn't a 90 degree angle at the end when doing the inside of the column. And in looking at the cut closer, it has markings as would be made with a torch but could be from something else.

I am not experienced in cutter charges, and I wonder how they'd cut the near side. They would be attached on all four sides, I'd expect and melt the steel towards the center. Or maybe someone would cut a hole and put guides inside the column to lay the cutter charge to blow through the near side (kind of kidding).

One thing I've never seen is how the columns were joined together one section to the next.
It seems there are quite a few pictures of columns that are seperated at their ends, indicating the joints were weaker than the columns or the connections were caused to fail.

Pictures of thermate cuts might give some comparisons if anyone can find any.

The fact that nano-thermate was found in the dust, if Jones is correct, means that it was used somehow. Unless it was just being stored in all three buildings that came down at 60% and even 100% of free-fall acceleration in some cases.
The molten steel reported by many expert witnesses several weaks after the attack in the basements and the intense heat of the collapse zone - when its obvious the fire is put out within the first two seconds of collapse, and any fire below the rubble would have been oxygen starved and was being flooded with water by the firemen, indicates another heat source capable of melting steel, which jet fuel and office furnishings can't do, and 80% of the collapsed building materials were cool to start with.
So large questions remain, regardless of one column surrounded by photoshopped models.

[Christophera]

I've never seen any forms being used for making a concrete core in any photos or videos of the towers.
Photos of the core columns show no concrete walls near them.

There is a very good reason why you have not seen concrete during construction, guiliani took the photos while the courts protect their hiding. Also there is a missing PBS video from 1990. (Update on search for missing PBS video by Dr. Ron Larsen.)

together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes.

Wonder why that fact is not on every 9-11 conspiracy site.

Wonder why this image, the only one of either of the towers core is only found on one 9-11 theory site, mine.

(IMG:http://algoxy.com/psych/images/southcorestands.gif)

Wonder why the statement of Leslie Robertson, an engineer of records for the Twins on September 13, 2001 where his information to Newsweek identifies a concrete core is not on every 9-11 conspiracy web site. And particuarly wonder why AFTER you realize that this,

(IMG:http://algoxy.com/psych/psyimages/femacore.gif) �

Is the only official diagram of the towers core of any kind in existence.


This post has been edited by Christophera: Mar 4 2010, 03:39 AM