Famous "diagonal Cut Column", Metalsmith analysis Options

[astronut]

Hi,
first, I'd like to suggest the Pilots Forum to combine WTC 1 and 2 Forums. Many of the posted topics in each room pertain to both buildings. More than the pertain to a single building. It would be easier to know where to post if even all WTC posts were in just one room. So, not knowing which room to post this to, I chose WTC 1.

With 5 years aviation and 25 years metal fabrication under my belt, I have written a paper that analyzes this famous photo. It also scrutinizes a photo used recently by "debunkers" when in fact, when looked at correctly, it supports the case for thermate at WTC.

This paper leads to another regarding the USGS thermal images from Sept 16th and 23rd, 2001. I'm looking for as much feedback as possible on this before submitting to the various research sites for inclusion.

http://www.centralmass911truth.org/diagonalcolumncut.html

Thanks, Larry

[Paul]

Check this out guys some silly little amatuer kiddies have mixed copper oxide with thermite and the result
is a rather decent sized explosion I highly doubt whether the concussive force from this explosion would be enough to
cut through thick steel beams though, if they can get it to explode this much do you guys think it would
be possible to create an even more powerful thermite explosion?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe0NZp43g50

[DoYouEverWonder]

Check this out guys some silly little amatuer kiddies have mixed copper oxide with thermite and the result
is a rather decent sized explosion I highly doubt whether the concussive force from this explosion would be enough to
cut through thick steel beams though, if they can get it to explode this much do you guys think it would
be possible to create an even more powerful thermite explosion?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe0NZp43g50

They've been using thermite in bombs since WWII (if not before).

By 1945 Allied HE bombs had increased in power five-fold. But by then, on an equal-weight basis, incendiaries such as the US 70 lb. (30 kg.) M47, which used napalm, were far more effective, though the liquid-filled British 30 lb. (13.6 kg.) ‘J’ bomb, first used by RAF Bomber Command in April 1944, was a failure as it often failed to work. Early British incendiaries filled with thermite—a mixture of iron oxide and powdered aluminium—produced great heat but this dissipated quickly and was confined to a small area. The Germans overcame this with their highly effective 1 kg. (2.2 lb.) bomb by making thermite its primary igniting substance and metallic magnesium the principal incendiary material. This made it burn with great heat for a long time and it could not be doused with water.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O129-bombs.html

This post has been edited by DoYouEverWonder: Apr 2 2010, 07:22 AM