Parts found Options

[rob balsamo]

None were matched via serial numbers with MX logs...

(IMG:http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/8691/wtcenginescaffolding1od.jpg)

(IMG:http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/4075/wtcenginescaffolding17qq.jpg)

(IMG:http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/4026/wtcenginepart6nf.jpg)

Also interesting to note. That engine fell more than 1000 feet and didnt do any damage to concrete.

[rob balsamo]

I think we can safely assume that the enginge either bounced and/or rolled to that location or was moved there (though that looks awfully heavy to move unless there was a good reason to). It would be very strange indeed if something followed the trajectory down which that engine would have and just stayed put exactly where it first hit the ground. So that probably explains the lack of observable concrete damage.

Im starting to be in agreement with that. I have looked over the trajectory and crunched some numbers since posting the above information and they seem to match up with speed/distance and acceleration due to gravity.

Now the only thing left is to match that part with UA175.. a 767... hopefully with maintenance logs. I have read some articles that say it may be from a 737? dunno.. still researching..