Help!, cant find link!!! Options

[THE_DECIDER]

i cant remember who posted it, but a couple weeks ago someone posted a link to a lawer who beat the tax law about 6 times...

if anyone knows who or what im talkin about, hopefully you can shoot me the link, thanx (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

[Sanders]

(Thread moved)

I don't know, DECIDER - did you look throught the IRS topic in the Library?

[Cary]

Are you talking about Robert Clarkson?

http://www.patriotnetwork.info/

He's beat the IRS several times in court. He was on Greg Szymanski's show yesterday.

[THE_DECIDER]

Are you talking about Robert Clarkson?

http://www.patriotnetwork.info/

He's beat the IRS several times in court. He was on Greg Szymanski's show yesterday.

i found it.....

Wins against IRS by Bill Conklin
http://www.anti-irs.com/

* Walder v. Conklin; U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming.
* Church of World Peace, Inc. v IRS, 715 F.2d 492
* United States v. Church of World Peace, 775 F.2d 265
* United States v Church of World Peace, 878 F2d 1281
* Conklin v. United States, 812 F.2d 1318
* Conklin v. C.I.R., 897 F.2d 1032
* Tavery v. United States, 897 F.2d 1027
* Tavery v. United States, Civ. No. 87-Z-180, USDC Colorado





ED BROWNs online blog

http://www.questforfairtrialinconcordnh.blogspot.com/

Ed Brown Is Only A Symptom

http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDAT...e2007-01-25.htm

credit against the |income| tax in the event you

should have a tax liability or income tax."
???????
(withholding)
-----------------------------------------------

Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect

Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the

Debts and provide for the common Defence and

general Welfare of the United States; but all

Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform

throughout the United States;
--------------------------------------------------

5th Amendment
"No person shall be compelled in any criminal case

to be a witness against himself."

---------------------------------------------------
Sullivan vs United States
?????????????????????????
---------------------------------------------------
4th Amendment
---------------------------------------------------
Flora v. U.S., 326 US 145.

"Our tax system is based upon voluntary assement

and payment, not upon distraint."
---------------------------------------------------
1040 Instructions
?????????????????
---------------------------------------------------
Tax Revunue Code
6001, 6011, 6012(a)
---------------------------------------------------
6001, Every Person Liable
6011, When Required
6012(1)(a)
Returns with respect to income taxes under subtitle

A shall by made by . . . every individual having

for the taxable year gross income,”

Sec. 861. Income from sources within the United States


---------------------------------------------------
Code Section 6109
http://www.fourmilab.ch/ustax/www/t26-F-61-B-6109.html
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Section 5702 - Liability for Tax and Method of

Payment
Section 5005 Persons liable for a Tax
(0 on Individual)
---------------------------------------------------
IRC Section 1 - Tax Imposed
(No section for liability on individual)

http://www.whatistaxed.com/
Individual is an Alien.



*just my notes from tonights research(1 of many), figured I might as well share*


Ed Brown is right, and I've yet to see anyone prove it otherwise. I'm open to an explanation as to why I (just your average Joe) is required to pay. Where is the law as they say. I've read on the IRS myths vs facts sites where to find this law is. And every time I search, it brings me back to the same place.

"There is no law, but we'll #ing destroy you if you don't pay little man."
To the dimwitted, the fact that tyranny is propagated on people is proof it is law.

Art 1 Section 8 Deffinitions

a. Taxes - Charge Apportioned Among the People
b. Duties- Imposts, representitive of all manners

of taxations.
c. duty on imported goods
d. Inland impostion on consumption of goods and

retail sales


A. Subject to the rule of apportionment

(Indirect Taxes)
------------------------------------------


Union Bank vs Hill (1866) 43 Tenn. 325

Direct Taxes - Real Property

Indirect Taxes - Articles of Consumption

--------------------------------------------


Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1
"->ALL<-
Duties , Imposts, and Excises shall be uniform

throughout the United States"
(Indirect Taxes, shall be the same in every state)



Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3
"Direct Taxes shall be approtioned among the

several states according to their respective

populations"
(California has 10% , they pay 10% of the tax etc)



Article 1 , Section 9 , Clause 4
"No capitalion, or other direct tax shall be laid,

unless in proportion to the census or enumeration

hereinbefore directed to be taken.

------------------------------------------------

Pollack vs Farmers Loan and Trust Co
158 U.S. 601 (1895)

"we are unable to conclude that the enforced

subtraction from the yield of all the owner's real

or personal property, in the manner perscribed is

so different from a tax upon the proptery itself,

that it is not a direct tax, within the meaning of

the constitution.

-------------------------------------------------
16th Amendment

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect

taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived,

without apportionment among the several States, and

without regard to any census or enumeration."

(Tax on income is a direct tax)

------------------------------------------------
Brushaber Decision. Brushaber v Union Pac. R.R.

250 U.S. 1 (1916)

That the authority conferred upon Congress by s 8

of article 1 'to lay and collect taxes, duties,

imposts and excises' is exhaustive and embraces

every conceivable power of taxation has never been

questioned, or, if it has, has been so often

authoritatively declared as to render it necessary

only to state the doctrine.

(The Income Tax is Indirect, and subject to Art 1,

Section 8 )
----"->ALL<-
Duties , Imposts, and Excises shall be uniform

throughout the United States"------

---------------------------------------------------
Custom Duties
19 CFR 351.102:

Direct Tax, "Direct Tax" means a tax on wages ,

profits, interests , rents, royalties, and all othe

forms of income, a tax on the ownership of real

property, or social welfare charge.

(Taxes on Wages are Direct)
---------------------------------------------------
Rosenman V United States 323 U.S. 658 (1945)

"The receipt by the Government of moneys under such

an arrangement carries no more significance than
would the giving of a surety bond. Money in these

accounts is held not as taxes duly collected are

held but as deposits made in the nature of a cash

bond for the payment of taxes thereafter found to

be due," Rosemary at 662, 65 S, Ct, at 538"

(Withholding)
---------------------------------------------

Baral vs United States, 528 U.s. 431 (2000)
"Contrary to Baral's claim, the withholding tax and

estimated tax are not taxes in their own right

(separate from the income tax), that are converted

into income tax only on the income tax return.

Rather, they are methods for collecting income

taxes."
???????
"Withholding and estimated Tax remittances are not

taxes in their own right, but methods for

collecting the income tax. Thus 31(a)(1) of the

Code provides that amounts withheld from wages

"shall be allowed to the recipient of the income as

Reagan report aka voodoo economics from the 1980's? What's that have to do with our current economy or government spending? We have been told mucho lies and we have immense fiscal problems bordering on a depression, fiat capitulation and global war.

http://mwhodges.home.att.net/1980-88.htm

1040 Checkmate?
http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTP2/UPDATES/...e2006-06-09.htm
DOJ Dismisses Felony Tax Prosecution
-- With Prejudice -- After PRA Defense Raised

Evidence OMB Complicit In Income Tax Fraud

DOJ & IRS Petitioned To Explain


On May 12, 2006 in Peoria, Illinois, the attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) begged the court to dismiss all charges against IRS victim Robert Lawrence in federal District Court.

The motion for dismissal came on the heels of a surprise tactic by Lawrence’s defense attorney Oscar Stilley.

The tactic threatened exposure of IRS’s on-going efforts to defraud the public. The move put DOJ attorneys in a state of panic that left them with only one alternative: beg for dismissal, with prejudice.

Former IRS Agent win his case in federal court?
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44956