Fbi Interference Pre-9/11, Frasca and Bowman - What do they tell us Options

[maturin42]

With all the 9/11 evidence that isn't really, unless it is someday openly acknowledged as such, it's strange that the purely circumstantial evidence of the behavior of a few FBI supervisors is so pursuasive and incriminating. It is so because of the utter predictability of such acts IF you understand that the purpose of some levels of the FBI bureaucracy was to stop discovery of the plot taking shape. Frasca sat on both the Moussoui warrant and the Phoenix memo while those who were really trying to protect the American people screamed and did everything they could to head off the dangers. OK, incompetence thrives in Bureaucracy. But incompetence on that scale and under those conditions should so completely embarrass the bureaucracy that those responsible would be summarily drummed out of the service or at least shuttled to a lowly sinecure to rot out the remainder of their careers. But no, Mr. Frasca was promoted to a position of more responsibility in "counter-terrorism" and Mr. Bowman received both a cash reward and recognition for outstanding service. When a congressman protested the latter he got no results.

What else do you have to say under the circumstances? How brazen does a thuggish regime have to be to reward openly such acts? Do they feel untouchable? I suppose so.

I hope they are wrong and are proven to be so before too long.

[Cary]

Welcome to the forum maturin42. Excellent first posts.