What Hit The South Tower?, The wrong plane!
Mar 3 2007, 12:46 PM
Group: Valued Member
Joined: 20-October 06
Member No.: 117
Here is an actual file photo of N612UA - the aircraft alleged to have impacted the South Tower (Flight 175):
New York - John F. Kennedy International (Idlewild) (JFK / KJFK)
USA - New York, April 28, 2001
Please take a look at the following comparisons:
We will observe that the nose section of a 200 series, A, is shorter than the wing assembly, B. Whereas for the 300 series A is longer than B.
767-200 => A:B = 190:200 = 0.95:1, i.e. A is less than B
767-300 => A:B = 221:200 = 1.105:1, i.e. A is greater than B
The NIST frames of the aircraft that impacted the South Tower give us A:B = 20.76:19.91 = 1.04:1
In other words, A is greater than B. Therefore, this plane's fuselage is too long to be a Boeing 767-222.
A more in-depth analysis can be found here:
This post has been edited by Beached: Mar 3 2007, 03:24 PM
Oct 27 2007, 06:05 PM
Group: Global Mod
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294
QUOTE (amazed! @ Mar 9 2007, 10:35 PM)
The passengers are always the sticking point, but it seems there are enough irregularites about the passengers--weird or incomplete lists, possible 2 gate controversy at BOS, deplaning in Cleveland, etc, etc, that whatever happened to the passengers offers only 2 possibilities--they were killed or not.
If they were not killed, the most practical means to absord and displace them would be the Federal Witness Protection Program.
Considering the relative reluctance of surviving family members to talk, it makes sense to me.
This is a very good point. Has anyone bothered looking for some gate agents or airport employees that were working early morning at Boston Logan or the other "originating" airports and might have actually seen 80-200 people board the respective flights?
I doubt even Cheney is thorough enough to cover up the "common man" working hourly airport wages...
|Lo-Fi Version||Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 12:58 PM|