What Hit The South Tower?, The wrong plane! |

Mar 3 2007, 12:46 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 802 Joined: 20-October 06 Member No.: 117 |
Here is an actual file photo of N612UA - the aircraft alleged to have impacted the South Tower (Flight 175):
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/205074/L/ United Airlines Boeing 767-222 New York - John F. Kennedy International (Idlewild) (JFK / KJFK) USA - New York, April 28, 2001 N612UA Please take a look at the following comparisons: (IMG:http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m275/beached1000/plaindud.jpg) (IMG:http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m275/beached1000/scale.jpg) We will observe that the nose section of a 200 series, A, is shorter than the wing assembly, B. Whereas for the 300 series A is longer than B. 767-200 => A:B = 190:200 = 0.95:1, i.e. A is less than B 767-300 => A:B = 221:200 = 1.105:1, i.e. A is greater than B The NIST frames of the aircraft that impacted the South Tower give us A:B = 20.76:19.91 = 1.04:1 In other words, A is greater than B. Therefore, this plane's fuselage is too long to be a Boeing 767-222. A more in-depth analysis can be found here: http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/second.html This post has been edited by Beached: Mar 3 2007, 03:24 PM |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 28 2007, 08:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 3,773 Joined: 14-December 06 From: Fort Pierce, FL Member No.: 331 |
Somebody here at PFT has uncovered the various roles of Dov Zakheim in the events of the day. Apparently he sold a batch of 32 Boeing 767 variant to the USAF for tankers. Perhaps that explains the irregularities AND some of those photos showing a fuselage with certain pods and appendages.
|
|
|
|
Beached What Hit The South Tower? Mar 3 2007, 12:46 PM
Beached Below is N612UA (image flipped horizontally) and t... Mar 3 2007, 05:33 PM
Zapzarap Yeah, I remember!
From Robert (SunZoo)'s ... Mar 3 2007, 06:08 PM
Beached I remembered that too, and went browsing the old L... Mar 3 2007, 06:47 PM
waterdancer another image for you- very large, so I won't ... Mar 3 2007, 10:39 PM
Zapzarap QUOTE (waterdancer @ Mar 4 2007, 03:39 AM)ano... Mar 4 2007, 04:00 AM
DoYouEverWonder QUOTE (Zapzarap @ Mar 4 2007, 04:00 AM) t... Jun 14 2009, 07:49 AM
achimspok Of course it's easy. It will be much harder to... Jun 16 2009, 08:03 AM
DoYouEverWonder QUOTE (achimspok @ Jun 16 2009, 08:03 AM)... Jun 16 2009, 08:13 AM
achimspok 9/11 No Plane Manifesto - 100% Proof - Part1
http... Jun 24 2009, 10:06 PM
achimspok I feel I should say it straight:
The title of the ... Sep 20 2009, 05:31 PM
waterdancer QUOTE (Zapzarap @ Mar 4 2007, 08:00 AM)QUOTE ... Mar 4 2007, 05:56 AM
Beached QUOTE (Zapzarap @ Mar 4 2007, 08:00 AM)QUOTE ... Mar 4 2007, 11:15 AM
amazed! The passengers are always the sticking point, but ... Mar 9 2007, 11:35 PM
Beached QUOTE (amazed! @ Mar 10 2007, 03:35 AM)Th... Mar 10 2007, 08:03 AM
biggahthebettah I have a question about this photo.
Does it loo... Apr 10 2007, 10:33 PM
tit2 There is a refutation of "The Wrong Plane... Apr 28 2007, 11:42 AM
painter Thanks, tit2 -- and by the way, welcome to our for... Apr 28 2007, 01:23 PM
Omega892R09 This possibility of aircraft substitution by caref... Oct 25 2007, 08:27 AM
amazed! It would be so easy. Oct 25 2007, 09:28 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Oct 25 2007, 07:27 AM)I ... Oct 26 2007, 07:08 AM
dMole QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Oct 25 2007, 07:27 AM)In... Oct 27 2007, 09:06 AM
amazed! Great post dMole. Oct 27 2007, 03:49 PM
dMole QUOTE (amazed! @ Mar 9 2007, 10:35 PM)The... Oct 27 2007, 06:05 PM
amazed! dMole
The controversy about gate assignments at B... Oct 27 2007, 08:40 PM
dMole QUOTE (amazed! @ Oct 27 2007, 07:40 PM)My... Oct 27 2007, 10:46 PM
amazed! No, that's not ridiculous. It is probably a v... Oct 28 2007, 11:00 AM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Oct 27 2007, 08:06 AM)Hello O8... Oct 28 2007, 01:19 PM
Factfinder General QUOTE (Zapzarap @ Mar 4 2007, 03:00 AM)has th... Oct 28 2007, 02:43 PM
amazed! The guys who did this followed Goebbels advice abo... Oct 28 2007, 04:51 PM
dMole QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Oct 28 2007, 12:19 PM)I ... Oct 29 2007, 04:16 AM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Oct 29 2007, 03:16 AM)Hello ag... Oct 29 2007, 08:03 AM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (Factfinder General @ Oct 28 2007, 01:4... Oct 29 2007, 08:20 AM
Omega892R09 OK WRT the orientation of the cores of WTC1 & ... Oct 29 2007, 12:26 PM
dMole QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Oct 29 2007, 07:03 AM)Th... Oct 29 2007, 03:01 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Oct 29 2007, 02:01 PM)Already-... Oct 31 2007, 01:14 PM
Factfinder General QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Oct 29 2007, 07:20 AM)So... Nov 1 2007, 11:13 AM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (Factfinder General @ Nov 1 2007, 10:13... Nov 2 2007, 05:52 PM
Factfinder General QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Nov 2 2007, 04:52 PM)FfG... Nov 3 2007, 07:54 AM
Omega892R09 Well I have just been looking over some of the vid... Nov 3 2007, 01:30 PM
Factfinder General QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Nov 3 2007, 12:30 PM)Wel... Nov 3 2007, 04:50 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (Factfinder General @ Nov 3 2007, 03:50... Nov 3 2007, 06:05 PM
Factfinder General QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Nov 3 2007, 05:05 PM)Sor... Nov 4 2007, 12:04 PM
teknikAL QUOTE (Beached @ Mar 4 2007, 10:15 AM)Conside... Nov 7 2007, 09:33 PM
rob balsamo Welcome to the forums tekh...
Feel free to email ... Nov 7 2007, 10:09 PM
Ningen FfG said:
"The so called live shots were ach... Dec 1 2007, 06:20 PM
tumetuestumefaisdubien QUOTE (Ningen @ Dec 1 2007, 05:20 PM)FfG said... Dec 1 2007, 06:58 PM
Leslie Landry QUOTE (Beached @ Mar 3 2007, 12:46 PM) He... Jun 13 2009, 10:45 PM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 07:53 PM |