IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Dr. Frank Greening Weighs In On Jrefers, 911Myths Contributor and JREFer Idol

chucksheen
post Apr 3 2007, 06:45 PM
Post #1





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 360
Joined: 4-November 06
Member No.: 208



"I’m new to posting on the govt loyalist site but I have been following this forum for quite a while and I have observed how the regular JREFers eagerly DEVOUR each CTist that ventures on to this Conspiracy thread to question the official 9/11 story. It all gets pretty much routine because the JREFers always use one or more of the following modes of attack:

(i) NIST has covered all the bases – you need to refute NIST to win an argument here.
(ii) Taunt the CTist with “where’s your evidence?”
(iii) Question the CTist’s credentials – “Are you a scientist?”; “Are you an engineer?”
(iv) Ask the CTist why there are no peer-reviewed journal articles refuting NIST.
(v) Ask the CTist if they are going to submit an article to a peer-reviewed journal.

When a CTist retreats, the JREFers pass the time patting each other on the back for another debunking job well done and discuss how idiotic that particular CTist was. While this may be a source of entertainment for the JREFers, this type of mutual admiration is not particularly helpful to anyone seeking to understand how the Twin Towers collapsed. In fact, I would say that the JREFers appear to be fixated only on smothering scientific debate under a blanket of NIST, FEMA, Kean, Fox and CNN “Truths”! But as Leonardo da Vinci so aptly states: “Whoever in a discussion adduces authority uses not intellect but rather memory.”

I have worked as a research scientist in industry and academia for MANY years but I do not recall ever witnessing such an endless appeal to authority, by one side in a debate, as I see with the JREFers! Indeed, I find the JREFers more often than not coming across as dogmatic followers of a creed. Thus, ironically they have become a modern band of Inquisitors doling out their autos-da-fe to heretic CTists for simply having the temerity to question NISTIAN authority.

In truth, the NIST Report is seriously flawed in many respects. It is inconsistent and contradictory in the way it treats the tipping of the upper section of each tower. It assumes that global collapse ensues without modeling the collapse. Its fire simulations generate such a wide array of temperature profiles as to be essentially useless. Its assumptions about the loss of thermal insulation are mere speculation. It ignores the important effects of massive releases of corrosive gases in the fires. Its metallurgical analysis of the steel is perfunctory. It ignores evidence (micron sized spheres) for the presence of molten iron in the towers prior to collapse. It mentions sulfidation, which it does not explain, while ignoring chlorination. And finally, NIST still cannot explain the collapse of WTC 7 after 6 years of trying….. This is the JREFers Bible!?!?!?"

Username: Apollo20

http://govtloyalistsite.org/showthread.php?t=78111

Source:

Loose Change Forums:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...wtopic=6811&hl=

TruthAction.org Forums:
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php...=asc&highlight=

Thanks 28th, Dr. Frank Greening and everyone else. This is a good puzzle piece for the truth.

This post has been edited by chucksheen: Apr 3 2007, 06:51 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DemolitionCrew
post Apr 3 2007, 06:56 PM
Post #2


Vermontbound


Group: Newbie
Posts: 890
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 73



Saw this earlier, these guys have to be quaking in their boots.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chucksheen
post Apr 3 2007, 07:01 PM
Post #3





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 360
Joined: 4-November 06
Member No.: 208



I haven't referenced the govt loyalist site and given them credence much if ever but I thought this was worth reading.

This post has been edited by chucksheen: Apr 3 2007, 07:02 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
heliweli
post Apr 5 2007, 06:45 PM
Post #4





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 177
Joined: 14-December 06
Member No.: 323



Spent an entire day reading those posts. I don't know if he is Greening or not, but by God he controlled the jreffers from start to finish. I laughed heartily all day reading it. Well worth a look,

This post has been edited by heliweli: Apr 5 2007, 06:52 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
painter
post Apr 5 2007, 07:09 PM
Post #5


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



I'm getting an error : Safari can’t open the page “http://govtloyalistsite.org/showthread.php?t=78111” because it can’t find the server “govtloyalistsite.org”. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cleanup.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chucksheen
post Apr 5 2007, 07:35 PM
Post #6





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 360
Joined: 4-November 06
Member No.: 208



QUOTE (painter @ Apr 5 2007, 06:09 PM)
I'm getting an error : Safari can’t open the page “http://govtloyalistsite.org/showthread.php?t=78111” because it can’t find the server “govtloyalistsite.org”. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cleanup.gif)

It's because the word J R E F is filtered and gets changed to "govtloyalist"...

You may have to visit manually.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Apr 5 2007, 07:50 PM
Post #7



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,266
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (chucksheen @ Apr 5 2007, 07:35 PM)
QUOTE (painter @ Apr 5 2007, 06:09 PM)
I'm getting an error : Safari can’t open the page “http://govtloyalistsite.org/showthread.php?t=78111” because it can’t find the server “govtloyalistsite.org”. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)   (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cleanup.gif)

It's because the word J R E F is filtered and gets changed to "govtloyalist"...

You may have to visit manually.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)


(pssst... painter knows that.. )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
painter
post Apr 5 2007, 08:06 PM
Post #8


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (johndoeX @ Apr 5 2007, 03:50 PM)

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
behind
post Apr 5 2007, 08:37 PM
Post #9





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 388
Joined: 25-August 06
Member No.: 13



I have to admit that the first part (that is when they did not knew that it was Greening) in the Greening threat is very funny... well some peole say that I have strange humor...I dont know.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 06:34 PM