Pilots Discuss Difficulty Of Wtc Attacks |

May 15 2007, 02:47 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE Professional Pilots Rob Balsamo and FAA Authorized Flight Examiner/Check Airman Dan Govatos discuss the difficulty of the WTC attacks as well as attempts to duplicate the attack in an Airline Simulator on tnrlive.com. visit truthorlies.org for archive of full interview. Visit http://pilotsfor911truth.org for the latest information and in depth analysis. (more) (less) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78 |
|
|
|
![]() |
May 18 2007, 07:30 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 388 Joined: 25-August 06 Member No.: 13 |
In my opinion it is very interesting what was said in the interview, that is, the speed of the wtc planes. And it surprised me that not so much has been talked about that issue before.
Now, the alleged speed for example of the 2.plane is based mostly on the videos. (Kausel talks also about radar but I understand him like he based the last mile or so on the videos) They used a great speed to support a huge damage inside the tower etc. But there is only one problem. How could inexperienced pilots controle the planes so perfectly at such a great speed ? And Eduardo Kausel Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering MIT admit that it looks strange to him: "The above data indicates that the terrorists flew towards the WTC close to the ground at nearly the full cruising speed of the planes, which is about 900 km/h (560 mph) at a normal altitude of 10km (33,000 ft). It is surprising that the inexperienced pilots that the terrorists were could still steer the planes at those speeds and hit their target head on. Also, consideering that the air at low altitudes is much denser than that at the normal cruising height, the pilots greatly exceeded VNE (“never exceed velocity”) and thereby risked disintegration of the aircraft by air friction." web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/PDFfiles/Chapter%20III%20Aircraft%20speed.pdf |
|
|
|
johndoeX Pilots Discuss Difficulty Of Wtc Attacks May 15 2007, 02:47 PM
painter Excellent, Rob! May 15 2007, 03:34 PM
Slick very interesting May 15 2007, 04:13 PM
amazed! Great story that nobody could hit the towers.
I... May 15 2007, 10:00 PM
Carl Bank QUOTE (amazed! @ May 16 2007, 02:00 AM)I ... May 15 2007, 10:05 PM
Sanders Cool May 16 2007, 12:55 AM
georgie101 Well done guy's, great interview. May 16 2007, 04:31 AM
amazed! Carl, I was refering to Flight 175 banking "a... May 18 2007, 08:57 AM
Carl Bank QUOTE (amazed! @ May 18 2007, 02:57 PM)Ca... May 18 2007, 09:24 AM
Guinan QUOTE (amazed! @ May 18 2007, 02:57 PM)Ca... May 18 2007, 10:12 AM
airborneffemt This old Grunt could see the "PAINTING" ... May 22 2007, 02:30 PM
lunk I wonder if there were some sort of homing devices... May 22 2007, 04:28 PM
dMole A bit on V speeds:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V... Oct 14 2008, 06:30 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Oct 12 2008, 09:30 PM) A b... Oct 15 2008, 10:39 AM
keroseneaddict It's been said before, but the alleged maneuve... Oct 14 2008, 07:57 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (keroseneaddict @ Oct 12 2008, 10:5... Oct 15 2008, 10:23 AM
tovarco QUOTE (keroseneaddict @ Oct 14 2008, 04:5... Oct 25 2008, 09:25 PM
amazed! dMole
Vne, not Vnd
Velocity NEVER EXCEED, the re... Oct 16 2008, 10:21 AM
keroseneaddict I'll be happy to reply tomorrow, even at the r... Oct 25 2008, 09:49 PM
rob balsamo welcome to the forum tovarco,
Please review this ... Oct 25 2008, 10:21 PM
amazed! 29.92
And somebody talked about the g force in th... Oct 26 2008, 05:53 PM
keroseneaddict QUOTE (amazed! @ Oct 26 2008, 05:53 P... Oct 26 2008, 08:31 PM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 05:47 PM |