If You Wish To Destroy A Movement, HOW DO YOU DO IT? Options

[painter]

The principals are the same whether you are trying to destroy a society, a nation, an economy, a political party or movement that is perceived as a potential threat. It is the very definition of COINTELPRO.

Understand that although the speaker, in this case Lyndon LaRouche, is talking about larger geopolitical programs of conquest -- and the wealth that is generated from internecine infighting and warfare -- it is THE PRINCIPAL that we must pay attention to.

It is a principal that is being played out every day in our discussions regarding 9/11.

Wake up. Pay attention. Stop taking the bait. Work together. Stay focused. Even if you suspect a comrade of less than honest motives, say nothing. Do nothing yet remain vigilant. Observe. Keep records. The traitor in your midst will invariably reveal himself by his own actions -- you need do nothing but shine the light of truth upon him when the time is ripe. When you do that, you don't need to convince anyone of anything for everyone will know.

. . . If you wish to destroy an area, how do you do it? Well, there are two ways. You can go in there and bomb it and so forth, but that's not very efficient. What you do is that you try to get the people in that area to kill each other and to destroy their own territory, their own farms, their own basis of subsistence, and that's what's been done in that area. This is a British-style operation, British East India Company-style operation, in which they have their agents in all factions, and they play one faction against the other. And they stir up reverberating hatreds.

You saw what was done in Lebanon. Lebanon was peaceful. Boom! Blown up! And the Israelis do the same thing. The Israelis are generally steered by the British—at least the right-wing Israelis—and they do the same thing. They destroy the Arabs. Why do you do that? Get 'em to fight each other.

For example, you had a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood was set up by British Intelligence and by [Ariel] Sharon, together, to set up a rivalry to the Palestinian Authority. So this resulted in a conflict, a manifold conflict. It still goes on. This is what the Saudis intervened in, to try to correct and neutralize with their intervention, and hopefully it will work. But the problem you're looking at here, is that kind of situation, a situation in which the way you destroy an opponent is get him to destroy himself, by dividing his ranks against one another, and they will do the job nicely. And then you feed both sides, you have agents feeding both sides, inflaming both sides. Then you have provocateurs stirring up fights within the chemistry of this environment, and they kill each other off. This is the kind of colonial management policy.

It's been done in Africa. You see the same thing, the British in Africa. The French in Africa, they did the same thing. The Belgians in Africa, they did the same thing. It's the way it's done. And it's time that some of us woke up to this reality, and stopped trying to give simplistic interpretations to things of this type reported here. To understand that people who try to maintain empires, and create empires, do it by manipulating the people they're trying to conquer, so the people kill themselves. It's what the British always did—get the other guys to fight.

http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2007/webcas...mar7_qanda.html

[Sanders]

This point can not get too much attention.

The technique is truly powerful. Even when you're aware of it, I can attest, it's hard to override human nature and not lash out at allies over petty differences of opinion.

Definitely worth pinning. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)