A problem I have with Flight 93, Am I the only one?? Options

[IVXX]

OK we've all seen hundreds of pictures of the crash site. The nice little "cartoon cut-out" in the ground. Here's a list of a few problems I have.........

- First and foremost, the grass around the imapct isn't burnt. It would seem no fire touched it at all.

- You have the body of the plane and the wings in the "cartoon cut-out" but no tail section mark.

- Also where is the "cartoon cut-out" for the engines that should be about midway from body to wing tip along the wings.

- The official lie tells us that due to the force of imapct with the gorund at almost 500 miles an houir most of the debris and remains are buried 50 ft or better into the ground. At first I thought, "OK I can buy that" but then one small problem. As they're moving earth to dig up debris and remains one of the first things they recover is an engine. What?? The engines are the heaviest thing on these planes and by official lie logic should have been buried deeper into the earth than anything upon impact.

Anyway I know I'm not the only one to think of these things. They definitely make you go "Hmmmmmmm" and I can't believe that anyone who buys the official lie doesn't ask these same questions. I just figured I would share incase anyone here missed one of these details.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif)

[NJcpaTOM]

I don't know what's worse. The crap the gov't thinks will swallow or the amout of people who are.

My sister belives United 93 crashed. She and her daughter went to a funeral of a friend of theirs who was on that Flight. Therefore it crashed - period

I printed out about 3/4 inches of documents from various websites, threw in 2 videos and a book and gave them to her. Haven't seen her since.

The most amazing thing to me is that there are so many people who know the truth and just let it continue to go on. Isn't that wierd ?

Planning to build memorials to passengers in a field for a plane that never crashed there?
What are they thinking?

I believe that United 93 landed safely in an airport as originally reported in the newspaper. Then the newspaper claims that there was an error in the story and removed it from the internet.

I believe the Mayor who said that United 93 landed in an airport and the Pa county coronor who stated that he had stopped being a Coronor 20 minuets after he arrived at the scene because there were no bodies nor wreckage.

I believe that all of the above were retracted because they were made an offer that they couldn't refuse.

I can't see how the President can keep a straight face when he lays a wreath at the wrong spot. He sure has the people fooled doesn't he.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/pilotfly.gif)