Deliberate Misrepresentation of Evidence, Videos carefully crafted to be easily debunked
Aug 17 2007, 07:46 PM
Joined: 17-August 07
Member No.: 1,736
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ THIS THREAD FIRST.
Hi painter, and everybody,
I am a new member. I am not a pilot, and I am no scientist by a long shot either. I promise to do my very best, to be both respectful and patient though, and I think I have something to offer.
A lot of people have been extremely turned off, to the ideas Fred and Killtown have been misrepresenting and purposely presenting very poorly, and I hope it is not too late to help undo the damage they have done.
I sure wish I had read, the thread this split off from, quite a bit sooner!
I was still very new to the ideas Fred and company were presenting, and I had just finished watching his 911 Octopus movie, for like the 10th time, when I finally joined their forum just a couple of months ago.
Back when I was a member of Killtown's forum, before they banned me for political reasons, I remember that Fred started a thread about what happened here.
As usual when one of them gets banned, they go to their forum and begin bragging about being banned, by the "nasty fascists" at LC and Pilots etc, and they then rave on and on about how 'they' don't ban people for political reasons.
The hell they don't though. They banned me, because I noticed this pattern, and I began asking them about the other HUGE PR blunders they ALL make on a regular basis also.
I also believe that the videos Fred has been making, are carefully crafted to be easily debunked later, when whoever oversees their modified limited hangout operation [cough Rick Siegel] gives them the word.
Please go here, and read my Rick Siegel's Lunatic Fringe: Todays NAZIS smear you as antisemtic thread on the Loose Change Forum about this.
Odd indeed, how the "nasty fascists" at LC, have left it up for a few days now. But if it's gone, then please go to my Youtube channel, linked to in my signature, and then read my comments section etc.
Thank you for letting me have my say. I hope I can be of service here.
Best to all of you,
This post has been edited by Natasha: Aug 18 2007, 01:34 AM
Aug 25 2007, 11:41 AM
Group: Valued Member
Joined: 19-October 06
From: European Protectorate
Member No.: 110
QUOTE (BoneZ @ Aug 25 2007, 04:27 PM)
QUOTE (u2r2h @ Aug 25 2007, 09:22 AM)
no-plane = no-fuel to melt the steel = big problem
jet fuel = can't melt steel = no problem (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif)
I've just read the last posts here after I replied to FfG in his Chopper4 thread
The point IMO is exactly that:
the planes are the central feature in the whole 9/11 psyop. If there was an irrefutable proof i.e. for no (big) plane hitting WTCII, the official narrative would collapse like a house of cards.
Nobody dislikes your believes. Can't see, where painter said he does.
I'll put it the Austrian way:
More evidence and less religion (and etymology - @FfG)
IMO B) Zap
|Lo-Fi Version||Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 11:14 PM|