IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

A Conversation With Joseph Keith, aerospace engineer

shure
post Aug 30 2007, 07:16 PM
Post #1





Group: Troll
Posts: 224
Joined: 17-October 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 99



(IMG:http://nomoregames.net/911/no_planer_resigns/keith.jpg)

Joseph keith is a retired Aerospace engineer who designed the "Shaker System" for Boeing. He was a founding member of Scientific Panel Investigating Nine Eleven (SPINE) but has since resigned.

Here is part of a conversation where he gives his expert analysis of the events of 9/11

click link below to listen or right click and save target as to download:
http://www.pumpshitout.com/audio/joseph_ke...1607_planes.mp3
(19min30sec 3.5mb mp3)

This post has been edited by shure: Aug 30 2007, 07:19 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
amazed!
post Sep 3 2007, 10:55 AM
Post #2





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,773
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Shure

I did listen to the tape. How else would I have known he used the terms?

Whether he was quoting somebody else or not is mostly irrelevant, and irresponsible on his part. Why did he, an engineer, not correct the terminology?

The design engineers used the term WITHSTAND. Why did not our hero Mr Keith the Engineer use that term instead of the misleading and incorrect ones he did?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th June 2013 - 01:37 AM