Boeing 767 Low-altitude Top Speed |

| Guest_Ningen_* |
Sep 2 2007, 01:35 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
Does anyone know how fast a Boeing 767 can fly at low altitude? The top speed at cruising altitude is over 500 mph, but I've heard the following about flight at 700 feet altitude:
The power plant will max out at 330 mph. The plane will begin to shake itself apart at over 220 mph. At 700 feet altitude, the air is so thick that if you go too fast you max the rotation of the turbines, the engines can't suck in air, and the engine starts acting as a brake. Does this make sense? Where could I get more detailed information about flight limitations (or whatever you call it) of the Boeing 767? Thank you. This post has been edited by Ningen: Sep 2 2007, 04:19 AM |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 31 2008, 09:18 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 3 Joined: 22-December 06 Member No.: 354 |
Does anyone know how fast a Boeing 767 can fly at low altitude? The top speed at cruising altitude is over 500 mph, but I've heard the following about flight at 700 feet altitude: The power plant will max out at 330 mph. The plane will begin to shake itself apart at over 220 mph. At 700 feet altitude, the air is so thick that if you go too fast you max the rotation of the turbines, the engines can't suck in air, and the engine starts acting as a brake. Does this make sense? Where could I get more detailed information about flight limitations (or whatever you call it) of the Boeing 767? Thank you. I am not sure how to use this thing, so sorry if this is wrong. I am working on a similar project, video to come, and so far I made this page. Top speed for a 767 is 898 kph/558 mph and that is at an altitude of about 30,000 feet, source: http://www.zap16.com/civ%20fact/civ%20Boeing%20767-200.htm at 30,000 feet the atmosphere is 1/3 the thickness of atmosphere at 700 feet. This would cause approximately 3 times as much drag so the top speed would be about 1/3 of the top speed at 30,000 feet, or about 200 to 300 mph at best, and that is with no wind. In a youtube video 175 travels 720 feet in 1.06 seconds = 720 Feet per Second = 490.90 Miles per Hour http://www.v911t.org/175Velocity.php and therefore that plane is likely not a 767. It may not be a real plane at all. Alfons v911t |
|
|
|
Aug 2 2008, 05:58 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 100 Joined: 27-April 07 Member No.: 999 |
Quote: "It may not be a real plane at all."
Debris of the airplane are visible in this video "unseen footage 9/11", 7minutes10 seconds after his beginning: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1...5L5_q2gLV8pGyBQ A suspicious debris? |
|
|
|
Ningen Boeing 767 Low-altitude Top Speed Sep 2 2007, 01:35 AM
Cary First up, welcome to the forum Ningen. Second, th... Sep 2 2007, 06:04 PM
Ningen Thanks, Cary. Actually, I was being a little cagy... Sep 2 2007, 06:15 PM
Ningen It looks like there is a thread already going abou... Sep 2 2007, 10:22 PM
ogrady Hi. I'm new here today and verifying Mr. Keith... Oct 1 2007, 07:20 PM
Factfinder General QUOTE (ogrady @ Oct 1 2007, 06:20 PM)Hi. I... Oct 2 2007, 02:43 AM
streetcar304 QUOTE (alfonslof @ Jul 31 2008, 09:18 PM)... Aug 4 2008, 10:02 PM
rob balsamo QUOTE (streetcar304 @ Aug 4 2008, 10:02 P... Aug 4 2008, 11:48 PM

streetcar304 QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Aug 4 2008, 11:48 PM... Aug 5 2008, 05:58 AM
thyket QUOTE (streetcar304 @ Aug 3 2008, 01:02 A... Aug 6 2008, 07:52 PM

rob balsamo QUOTE (thyket @ Aug 6 2008, 07:52 PM) 757... Aug 6 2008, 08:16 PM

streetcar304 QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Aug 6 2008, 08:16 PM... Aug 7 2008, 06:28 AM
dMole QUOTE (streetcar304 @ Aug 4 2008, 08:02 P... Aug 17 2008, 05:06 AM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Aug 15 2008, 08:06 AM) Ano... Aug 17 2008, 07:46 AM
dMole QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Aug 17 2008, 05:46 A... Aug 17 2008, 08:44 AM
dMole QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Aug 17 2008, 05:46 A... Aug 17 2008, 12:57 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Aug 15 2008, 03:57 PM) Tha... Aug 18 2008, 11:43 AM
rob balsamo Your friend is speculating unless he himself has a... Aug 5 2008, 08:42 AM
amazed! I've never flown a Boeing or any other airline... Aug 6 2008, 03:31 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (amazed! @ Aug 4 2008, 06:31 PM... Aug 7 2008, 11:43 AM
fransan I would like to tell you some of my own experience... Aug 7 2008, 12:42 AM
dMole QUOTE (fransan @ Aug 6 2008, 10:42 PM) Bu... Aug 17 2008, 05:36 AM
rob balsamo P4T never claimed Vmo/Mmo is the max speed an airc... Aug 7 2008, 10:20 AM
Seatnineb one thing is for sure....a 767 incurs aerodynamic ... Aug 16 2008, 04:27 AM
rcane QUOTE (Seatnineb @ Aug 16 2008, 04:27 AM)... Sep 7 2008, 03:28 PM
Seatnineb QUOTE (rcane @ Sep 7 2008, 02:28 PM) Don... Sep 8 2008, 05:13 PM
amazed! The better question IMO, is can an autopilot fly t... Aug 16 2008, 11:07 AM
dMole "You know that the safety factors built into ... Aug 17 2008, 04:43 AM
fransan Hello. I insist the actual limit of the airframe ... Aug 17 2008, 03:12 PM
rob balsamo QUOTE (fransan @ Aug 17 2008, 03:12 PM) H... Aug 17 2008, 06:05 PM
fransan Hey, hey, easy there Rob. Sorry for voicing my hu... Aug 18 2008, 01:38 PM
dMole OK, here's a little on the [off-topic, red her... Aug 18 2008, 02:51 PM
Seatnineb Ok...this may not be a 767....but the laws of aer... Aug 18 2008, 03:07 PM
dMole Thanks S9B- sourced aerodynamics information is al... Aug 18 2008, 04:04 PM
Seatnineb QUOTE (dMole @ Aug 18 2008, 04:04 PM) Tha... Aug 19 2008, 02:56 PM
dMole QUOTE (Seatnineb @ Aug 19 2008, 12:56 PM)... Aug 19 2008, 06:34 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Aug 17 2008, 08:34 PM) The... Aug 20 2008, 12:38 PM
dMole QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Aug 20 2008, 10:38 A... Aug 20 2008, 07:14 PM
Omega892R09 On lack of data.
What puzzles me about all this i... Aug 19 2008, 07:26 AM
rob balsamo Limitations are learned during initial training, a... Aug 19 2008, 01:24 PM
amazed! The vast majority of limitations can be exceeded w... Aug 19 2008, 02:31 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (amazed! @ Aug 17 2008, 05:31 P... Aug 19 2008, 04:57 PM
SubjectX Let's look at it like this;
If an air liner h... Jan 24 2009, 05:28 AM
dMole QUOTE (SubjectX @ Jan 24 2009, 02:28 AM) ... Jan 24 2009, 05:50 PM
rob balsamo QUOTE (dMole @ Jan 24 2009, 04:50 PM) In ... Jan 24 2009, 06:52 PM
rob balsamo I havent cross checked your numbers, however, all ... Jan 24 2009, 02:26 PM
tnemelckram Hi all! Interesting. With respect to Rob... Jan 25 2009, 01:31 PM
Seatnineb Well
It would seem for the 707 used in the 1984 ... Jan 25 2009, 08:42 AM
dMole Thank you S9B,
and not that it makes a huge diffe... Jan 25 2009, 09:03 AM
rob balsamo QUOTE (Seatnineb @ Jan 25 2009, 07:42 AM)... Jan 25 2009, 02:18 PM
tnemelckram Hi Rob!
QUOTE Of course.... anything is possi... Jan 25 2009, 03:48 PM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 10:26 PM |