Boeing 767 Low-altitude Top Speed |

| Guest_Ningen_* |
Sep 2 2007, 01:35 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
Does anyone know how fast a Boeing 767 can fly at low altitude? The top speed at cruising altitude is over 500 mph, but I've heard the following about flight at 700 feet altitude:
The power plant will max out at 330 mph. The plane will begin to shake itself apart at over 220 mph. At 700 feet altitude, the air is so thick that if you go too fast you max the rotation of the turbines, the engines can't suck in air, and the engine starts acting as a brake. Does this make sense? Where could I get more detailed information about flight limitations (or whatever you call it) of the Boeing 767? Thank you. This post has been edited by Ningen: Sep 2 2007, 04:19 AM |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 7 2008, 12:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 47 Joined: 27-April 08 Member No.: 3,238 |
I would like to tell you some of my own experience of high speed at low altitude flying.
Many years ago, we didn´t have the limitation of 250 kias max below 10000 feet in México, and oil prices where not a factor. The time it took to get to places however, somehow had become very important and attractive to people and our airline execs. So we flew all the time at max. speeds. I think about it now and find it hard to believe. But we acctually flew (B.727 by the way) at up to 390 kias as low as a 1000 feet. (Yes one thousand feet) CRAZY. What I´m trying to say, basically is, there´s no problem with those airplanes going up to max speed at any altitude. Many times also we would go beyond "barber pole" (the max. speed shown on the indicator) on descent and hear the "tac, tac, tac, tac" (similar to a machine gun) warning, pull back a little to go back to within limits. There was an incident, I believe it was an AA B727 that had a very scarry spyraling descent where the FDR went beyond the graph and there was speculation that it had gone beyond MACH 1 for a few secs. Maybe some of the pilots here can remember the case. (The pilots had deactivated the leading edge slats at cruise to extend 2 degrees of flaps, trailing edge only, and the FE came back from the bathroom, saw the CB out and pushed it in, they where something like FL350 and as the leading edge slats started to extend by this action, the airplane became uncontrolable, and kind of spyraled down, the pilot was able to recover from the dive after extending the landing gear, way above max. landing gear extension speed, at something like 12000 feet. The aircraft sustained some damage but still was able to continue for a landing basically in one piece.) The speed at which a Boeing will start coming appart I would think is very hard to determine, they must have a ball park figure I guess (Boeing). I think it should be just beyond MACH 1 as these are not supersonic aircraft. My $ 2c |
|
|
|
Aug 17 2008, 05:36 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
But we acctually flew (B.727 by the way) at up to 390 kias as low as a 1000 feet. (Yes one thousand feet) CRAZY. What I´m trying to say, basically is, there´s no problem with those airplanes going up to max speed at any altitude. Hello fransan, FAA type data sheet for B727 says: http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance...1C?OpenDocument http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance...6;FILE/A3we.pdf "Airspeed limits: VMO/MMO - 390/0.9 (KEAS), Dual Mode 390/350/0.88 (KEAS) For other airspeed limits see the appropriate FAA approved Airplane Flight Manual." 390 kts is right at V_mo, not ~150 knots over V_mo. (~142% of V_mo for B767-200 in the OCT "UA175" case). My $0.02, and I'm still looking for sourced turbofan engine overspeed survivability evidence (refer to my air density vs. altitude post above). |
|
|
|
Ningen Boeing 767 Low-altitude Top Speed Sep 2 2007, 01:35 AM
Cary First up, welcome to the forum Ningen. Second, th... Sep 2 2007, 06:04 PM
Ningen Thanks, Cary. Actually, I was being a little cagy... Sep 2 2007, 06:15 PM
Ningen It looks like there is a thread already going abou... Sep 2 2007, 10:22 PM
ogrady Hi. I'm new here today and verifying Mr. Keith... Oct 1 2007, 07:20 PM
Factfinder General QUOTE (ogrady @ Oct 1 2007, 06:20 PM)Hi. I... Oct 2 2007, 02:43 AM
alfonslof QUOTE (Ningen @ Aug 31 2007, 03:35 AM) Do... Jul 31 2008, 09:18 PM
tit2 Quote: "It may not be a real plane at all.... Aug 2 2008, 05:58 AM
streetcar304 QUOTE (alfonslof @ Jul 31 2008, 09:18 PM)... Aug 4 2008, 10:02 PM
rob balsamo QUOTE (streetcar304 @ Aug 4 2008, 10:02 P... Aug 4 2008, 11:48 PM

streetcar304 QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Aug 4 2008, 11:48 PM... Aug 5 2008, 05:58 AM
thyket QUOTE (streetcar304 @ Aug 3 2008, 01:02 A... Aug 6 2008, 07:52 PM

rob balsamo QUOTE (thyket @ Aug 6 2008, 07:52 PM) 757... Aug 6 2008, 08:16 PM

streetcar304 QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Aug 6 2008, 08:16 PM... Aug 7 2008, 06:28 AM
dMole QUOTE (streetcar304 @ Aug 4 2008, 08:02 P... Aug 17 2008, 05:06 AM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Aug 15 2008, 08:06 AM) Ano... Aug 17 2008, 07:46 AM
dMole QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Aug 17 2008, 05:46 A... Aug 17 2008, 08:44 AM
dMole QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Aug 17 2008, 05:46 A... Aug 17 2008, 12:57 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Aug 15 2008, 03:57 PM) Tha... Aug 18 2008, 11:43 AM
rob balsamo Your friend is speculating unless he himself has a... Aug 5 2008, 08:42 AM
amazed! I've never flown a Boeing or any other airline... Aug 6 2008, 03:31 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (amazed! @ Aug 4 2008, 06:31 PM... Aug 7 2008, 11:43 AM
rob balsamo P4T never claimed Vmo/Mmo is the max speed an airc... Aug 7 2008, 10:20 AM
Seatnineb one thing is for sure....a 767 incurs aerodynamic ... Aug 16 2008, 04:27 AM
rcane QUOTE (Seatnineb @ Aug 16 2008, 04:27 AM)... Sep 7 2008, 03:28 PM
Seatnineb QUOTE (rcane @ Sep 7 2008, 02:28 PM) Don... Sep 8 2008, 05:13 PM
amazed! The better question IMO, is can an autopilot fly t... Aug 16 2008, 11:07 AM
dMole "You know that the safety factors built into ... Aug 17 2008, 04:43 AM
fransan Hello. I insist the actual limit of the airframe ... Aug 17 2008, 03:12 PM
rob balsamo QUOTE (fransan @ Aug 17 2008, 03:12 PM) H... Aug 17 2008, 06:05 PM
fransan Hey, hey, easy there Rob. Sorry for voicing my hu... Aug 18 2008, 01:38 PM
dMole OK, here's a little on the [off-topic, red her... Aug 18 2008, 02:51 PM
Seatnineb Ok...this may not be a 767....but the laws of aer... Aug 18 2008, 03:07 PM
dMole Thanks S9B- sourced aerodynamics information is al... Aug 18 2008, 04:04 PM
Seatnineb QUOTE (dMole @ Aug 18 2008, 04:04 PM) Tha... Aug 19 2008, 02:56 PM
dMole QUOTE (Seatnineb @ Aug 19 2008, 12:56 PM)... Aug 19 2008, 06:34 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (dMole @ Aug 17 2008, 08:34 PM) The... Aug 20 2008, 12:38 PM
dMole QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Aug 20 2008, 10:38 A... Aug 20 2008, 07:14 PM
Omega892R09 On lack of data.
What puzzles me about all this i... Aug 19 2008, 07:26 AM
rob balsamo Limitations are learned during initial training, a... Aug 19 2008, 01:24 PM
amazed! The vast majority of limitations can be exceeded w... Aug 19 2008, 02:31 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (amazed! @ Aug 17 2008, 05:31 P... Aug 19 2008, 04:57 PM
SubjectX Let's look at it like this;
If an air liner h... Jan 24 2009, 05:28 AM
dMole QUOTE (SubjectX @ Jan 24 2009, 02:28 AM) ... Jan 24 2009, 05:50 PM
rob balsamo QUOTE (dMole @ Jan 24 2009, 04:50 PM) In ... Jan 24 2009, 06:52 PM
rob balsamo I havent cross checked your numbers, however, all ... Jan 24 2009, 02:26 PM
tnemelckram Hi all! Interesting. With respect to Rob... Jan 25 2009, 01:31 PM
Seatnineb Well
It would seem for the 707 used in the 1984 ... Jan 25 2009, 08:42 AM
dMole Thank you S9B,
and not that it makes a huge diffe... Jan 25 2009, 09:03 AM
rob balsamo QUOTE (Seatnineb @ Jan 25 2009, 07:42 AM)... Jan 25 2009, 02:18 PM
tnemelckram Hi Rob!
QUOTE Of course.... anything is possi... Jan 25 2009, 03:48 PM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 01:45 PM |