Flight 77 Never Crashed Near The Pentagon, The Facts Versus Loyal Bushie Lies Options

[Terral]

Greetings to All:

This thread exposes ‘the truth’ that no 100-Ton Jetliner (Flight 77) ever crashed at the Pentagon on 9/11. You are encouraged to find us the picture of a crashed 100-Ton Jetliner anywhere near the Pentagon. Department of Defense Operatives planted plenty of evidence relating to this 9/11 HOAX, as the DoD carried out their own ‘self-inflicted’ wound on 9/11! Before anyone can haul out pictures of planted engines, they must show us how those things passed through the solid West Wedge Wall still intact after the original attack. Everyone here should review all of the pictures from this website ( http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/simulation.html ). Hit ‘Previous’ and ‘Next’ buttons, until your heart is content, but the only pictures of any 100-Ton Jetliner will be in the simulations. The most damning evidence to the Official Government Cover Story is revealed in these first two pictures:

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/lawndamage.html

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/fireball_shot.jpg)

This picture shows a single impact hole in the West Wedge E-Ring Wall section of the Pentagon. However there are no impact holes for the multi-ton Rolls Royce engines some 50 feet apart. In fact, there is no place on the lawn or in the Pentagon wall for any crashed 100-Ton Jetliner.

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/pentalawn.html

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/lawn0.jpg)

The fire has been extinguished for the first time, but the West Wedge Wall is still standing. Note the fire is still burning in two areas, but the firemen are dragging their hoses around like the job is done! Someone had to order these firemen away from the fire that you can still see burning in this picture. Look at the Pentagon lawn for any sign of Jetliner Debris to realize there is none!

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/spools.html

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/fire_spools.jpg)

The Official Bush Administration Cover Story says kerosene (Jet fuel is only kerosene) vaporized an entire Jetliner, but did not even melt the black plastic on these cables. This picture shows the masonry components of the outer E-ring wall still standing, which eliminates the possibly of any 100-Ton Pig passing through here.

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/details.html

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/impact_scale.jpg)

This schematic shows only seven feet between the tops of those cable spools and the bottom of the still intact second floor where only two windows are missing. Note the two windows to the left are not even broken, while the three damaged columns are bent back in our direction. The Official Pentagon Cover Story attempts to squeeze their 125-feet wide 100-Ton Jetliner into a space that simply cannot contain a Jetliner less than half this size. The DoD released the video footage from two security cameras ( http://www.pentagonresearch.com/dod.html ), from where this famous Frame1 image was taken:

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/a1-Frame1.jpg)

Follow along and we will use this evidence to prove this contains the nose section of an object with the exact diameter of a Tomahawk Missile ( http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html#_SLCM = 20.9 inches). Our first task is to identify that our camera lens, the top of the right hand column, the nose of the flying object and a point 5-feet above the horizon are all on the same level horizontal transit plane elevation. That means if we superimposed a flat sheet of glass 5 feet off the ground, then all four reference points would be touching along the same ‘line of vision’ from our perspective inside the camera lens. We take the five-foot dimension from the center of our flying object and measure down to the ground to realize the ‘clearance’ under the object is 3 times greater than the diameter. If the nose of the object is at 5-feet and the distance below that object is 3 to 4 feet, then the diameter of that flying object cannot possibly exceed 2 feet. These four reference points on the same level horizontal plane are demonstrated again here:

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/5footplane.jpg)

Cameras #1 and #2 are on the far left facing in the direction of the red 5-Foot Horizontal Elevation Plane to your right. The top of our column is very near the two cameras, even though it appears in only one set of images. The nose of the flying object is very low to the ground on this same 5-foot plane directly between the top of our 5-foot column and the horizon in the distance. If any of these reference points were higher or lower than our 5-foot elevation, then those points would not line up in the frame1 picture above. We are perhaps lucky that the missile is approaching on the same elevation as the three reference points and lucky again that the nose was captured meeting the top of the column. However, we are using these reference locations to our advantage, even though the laws of probability just happen to be on our side this time. :0).

Since the diameter of a real 757-200 Jetliner is just about 15 feet, there is no way this frame1 object can possibly be anything near that size. Remember our 3 to 1 ration of ‘clearance to object diameter' from the frame1 diagram above. If the diameter of that flying object is 15 feet, then the clearance underneath is 3 times that number or a whopping 45 feet! Those calculations place the nose of the 100-Ton Jetliner at the “52-6” dimension far up the wall on the right hand side of this diagram. In other words, even the released Department of Defense pictures prove the Pentagon was struck by white flying object with the dimensions of a Tomahawk Missile, which is verified by the military witnesses in the Pentagon:

http://911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttackWitnessesBlast.shtml

What I post here is only a few excerpts (read the site yourself):

In subsequent discussions on Gerard Holmgren's Flight77Witnesses article at indymedia.org, there is a further point of significant interest. A number of witnesses in the Pentagon Attack mention the smell of cordite (very different from the smell of kerosene) and a shockwave (very different from an impact and fire):

The airliner crashed between two and three hundred feet from my office in the Pentagon, just around a corner from where I work. ... I walked to my office, shut down my computer, and headed out. Even before stepping outside I could smell the cordite. Then I knew explosives had been set off somewhere. [WWW] McSweeney's

A personnel attorney at the Pentagon, Goldsmith was riding a shuttle bus to work on Tuesday, Sept. 11, when she learned of the attack on the world Trade Center. ... "We saw a huge black cloud of smoke," she said, saying it smelled like cordite or gun smoke. [WWW] Jewish Bulletin News

[WWW] Witnesses in the Pentagon, mostly military men, describe a shockwave and a blast; only explosives give a shockwave; there is no shockwave from a crash and fire:

Cordite + shockwave = Missile attack like Rumsfeld told Parade Magazine on 9/12 from the beginning:

http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%2...-Flight-77.html

Read the whole story from the link! These are only Rumsfeld’s words on this missile strike!

Rumsfeld To Parade Magazine on 9/12 >> Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.

Remember that CNN Chief Pentagon Correspondent Jamie McIntire reported "No Plane" in his report on 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C02dE5VKeck

The Bush Administration lied about Weapons Of Mass Destruction in Iraq and they lied about Flight 93 crashing in the empty field outside of Shanksville (see my thread http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=8773 ) on 9/11. He is also lying about Flight 77 crashing here at the Pentagon, which is proven by careful examination of all the evidence.

GL,

Terral
911Truth.org
AE911Truth.org

This post has been edited by Terral: Sep 2 2007, 07:59 AM

[SPreston]

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/a1-Frame1.jpg)

Follow along and we will use this evidence to prove this contains the nose section of an object with the exact diameter of a Tomahawk Missile ( http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html#_SLCM = 20.9 inches).  Our first task is to identify that our camera lens, the top of the right hand column, the nose of the flying object and a point 5-feet above the horizon are all on the same level horizontal transit plane elevation. That means if we superimposed a flat sheet of glass 5 feet off the ground, then all four reference points would be touching along the same ‘line of vision’ from our perspective inside the camera lens.  We take the five-foot dimension from the center of our flying object and measure down to the ground to realize the ‘clearance’ under the object is 3 times greater than the diameter.  If the nose of the object is at 5-feet and the distance below that object is 3 to 4 feet, then the diameter of that flying object cannot possibly exceed 2 feet. These four reference points on the same level horizontal plane are demonstrated again here:

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/5footplane.jpg)

Cameras #1 and #2 are on the far left facing in the direction of the red 5-Foot Horizontal Elevation Plane to your right.  The top of our column is very near the two cameras, even though it appears in only one set of images.  The nose of the flying object is very low to the ground on this same 5-foot plane directly between the top of our 5-foot column and the horizon in the distance. If any of these reference points were higher or lower than our 5-foot elevation, then those points would not line up in the frame1 picture above.  We are perhaps lucky that the missile is approaching on the same elevation as the three reference points and lucky again that the nose was captured meeting the top of the column.  However, we are using these reference locations to our advantage, even though the laws of probability just happen to be on our side this time. :0).

Since the diameter of a real 757-200 Jetliner is just about 15 feet, there is no way this frame1 object can possibly be anything near that size.  Remember our 3 to 1 ration of ‘clearance to object diameter' from the frame1 diagram above.  If the diameter of that flying object is 15 feet, then the clearance underneath is 3 times that number or a whopping 45 feet! Those calculations place the nose of the 100-Ton Jetliner at the “52-6” dimension  far up the wall on the right hand side of this diagram.  In other words, even the released Department of Defense pictures prove the Pentagon was struck by white flying object with the dimensions of a Tomahawk Missile, which is verified by the military witnesses in the Pentagon:

http://911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttackWitnessesBlast.shtml

Very interesting. This is exactly why our critical examination by eye and common sense told each of us that these videos were not of a 757. The perspective was way off for it to be a 757. In the released video, there is a vehicle backing out of the area between the camera and the airframe flight path, apparently backing out from north of the helipad. The high explosive blows at 1:27 in the video and the vehicle backs out at 2:40. The pickup is much closer to the camera and would be even smaller if back at the flight path. That had to be a very small air frame or a fake video. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Pentagon Video

Perhaps a Tomahawk with a WDU-36 warhead w/ PBXN-107 explosive did hit the Pentagon or perhaps planted explosives did all the work and the security videos were faked, while a remote piloted 757 flew over the Pentagon roof from north of the Citgo gas station.
(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/Pentagon%20folder%202/pullupgif.gif) (IMG:http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/images/tomahawk-ani.gif) (IMG:http://www.the7thfire.com/images/pentani.gif)
(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/Pentagon%20folder%202/flyover.jpg)
Bright white high explosive lights up entire area. Not jet fuel. Likely source: Planted high explosives or Tomahawk missile impact.
(IMG:http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2006/911-Pentagon-Crash18may06c.jpg)
(IMG:http://farm1.static.flickr.com/24/147842996_d7c914980f.jpg)
Bright white high explosive Tomahawk impact. BGM-109 Tomahawk
(IMG:http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/budget/fy2001/dot-e/images/01tomahawk.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/slcm2c.jpg)

[hturt]

Doesn't the 5 frames support a "plane" coming from North of the Citgo rather than the sharper angle from the light poles?

[Terral]

Hi Preston:

I love your avatar. :0) Wow! Thank you for the excellent pictures. I am very interested in knowing the original sources from where these images were gathered, so I can carry out my own investigation. This looks like great info to help my Pentagon presentation, but I need to verify the data is from authentic, verifiable and reputable sources. Thank you again and please post any similar images you have available relating to this Pentagon “Inside Job” attack.

Terral

[SPreston]

Hi Preston:

I love your avatar. :0) Wow!  Thank you for the excellent pictures. I am very interested in knowing the original sources from where these images were gathered, so I can carry out my own investigation.  This looks like great info to help my Pentagon presentation, but I need to verify the data is from authentic, verifiable and reputable sources.  Thank you again and please post any similar images you have available relating to this Pentagon “Inside Job” attack. 

Terral

The two flyover photos come from the Loose Change CIT team showing what the flyover might have looked like from north of the Citgo gas station and might have looked like to observers rushing to their windows in reaction to the sounds of explosions at the Pentagon. Unfortunately the call-in 911 tapes for Arlington County (Confiscated and permanently sequestered 9-11 call-in tapes and transcripts) were as usual in this 9-11 Crime of the Century confiscated and censored from the public by the FBI, and we may never know what people located north and south and east of the Pentagon saw and reported on that day. The worthless mainstream media is certainly not interested are they? The Pentagon Video was obtained through the Judicial Watch FOI legal request. The sources for the other photos are given in my post. So how did the plastic cable reels survive destruction from the 757 fuselage or melting by the horrendous jet fuel? explosion? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif)
Arrogant Deception - Or an Attempt to Expose a Cover-up?
(IMG:http://physics911.ca/org/modules/myalbum/photos/12.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.kolumbus.fi/sy-k/pentagon/sideview.GIF)

[Terral]

Greetings to All:

My Opening Post contains an error in the sentences below the Schematic picture.

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/impact_scale.jpg)

Terral Old >>  This schematic shows only seven feet between the tops of those cable spools and the bottom of the still intact second floor where only two windows are missing. Note the two windows to the left are not even broken, while the - three damaged columns are bent back in our direction.- Wrong! My bad. :0)

Terral New >> This schematic shows only seven feet between the tops of those cable spools and the bottom of the still intact second floor where only two windows are missing. Note the two windows to the left are not even broken, with the base of the second floor blown out from the blast inside. The first course of limestone is still attached to make dangling arms hanging off the wall only looking like columns.

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/pentagonlimestone.jpg)

Further investigation reveals the perceived bent columns are actually sections of limestone facing broken off from above with the “First Course Of Limestone Still Attached.” The lower courses of second story concrete block and their columns were blown out some 3 inches from the missile warhead detonating inside the 20-Feet Diameter Entry Hole. The Limestone units are “pushed out” from the inside exposing the primary masonry wall. Note the Limestone Debris Pile that fell back our direction.

(IMG:http://s29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/simulation.jpg)

Another view shows the masonry components between Column Line 13 and 15 were also blown back in our direction, after the Tomahawk Missile punched a hole in the outer E-Ring wall to detonate just inside the Pentagon. Since the 21-inch square columns are 10 feet on centers, the Entry Hole is actually 18’-3” in diameter. The first floor columns 16, 17 and 18 ( http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Ter...fire_spools.jpg ) remain intact behind the breached limestone sections hanging down like arms from the second story wall bulging out in our direction.

(IMG:http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/leftsidedamage.jpg)

Damage to the North side of the Entry Hole sees Column 8 intact, but Columns 9 through 12 appear to be missing, which assisted in the eventual collapse. The fence was also thrown back over the hood of the small vehicle, when the first floor masonry wall was blasted back in our direction. These are all signatures of a missile attack with warhead detonation just inside column #14 shifting the primary masonry wall out to dislodge the limestone masonry units. A man could easily stand atop the SUV and reach the second floor elevation with his hands, which proves no 100-ton Jetliner had anything to do with damaging this masonry wall.

GL,

Terral
AE911Truth.org

This post has been edited by Terral: Sep 18 2007, 07:29 AM

[Aldo Marquis CIT]

These are all signatures of a missile attack with warhead detonation just inside column #14 shifting the primary masonry wall out to dislodge the limestone masonry units. A man could easily stand atop the SUV and reach the second floor elevation with his hands, which proves no 100-ton Jetliner had anything to do with damaging this masonry wall. 

GL,

Terral
AE911Truth.org

Terral,

No one saw a missile.

No one saw a man on top of an SUV.

A missile can NOT cause the damage the generator trailer, all of those columns on the outside, the second floor slab at the opening, the columns and walls inside, and cause the C-Ring hole.

People watched the jet approach the building from the impact side. They did not see a missile.

Explosives were placed in and or/near the generator trailer, behind the wall, there were aviation fuel tanks near there. Explosives inside Wedge 1 and a wall breaching kit for the exit hole.

You know who would be prime suspects? Pentagon "renovation workers".

And guess what? Two Pentagon "renovation workers" described the fabricated SOUTH side flight of the plane through the light poles to the ASCE's Paul Mlakar (as seen in History Channel doc) for the ASCE Building Performance Report. Their descriptions generated these images:

(IMG:http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e207/Mercury2/ASCE_approach.jpg)

(IMG:http://thepentacon.com/images/ASCEdamagepath.jpg)

One was Don Mason who accounts for the light poles getting hit, the other was Frank Probst.

(IMG:http://www.vhtrc.org/brr/2005/probst.jpg)

(IMG:http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e207/Mercury2/Mason_Probst_account.jpg)

He was allegedly walking, saw the jet coming at him on the official flight path and dives out of the way 6 ft from the jet's engine.

Left engine:
(IMG:http://www.questionsquestions.net/blog/images/050228probst.jpg)

Right engine:
(IMG:http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e207/Mercury2/FrankProbst.jpg)

Frank Probst was one of them. A Pentagon renovation worker and retired Army officer, he was inspecting newly installed telecommunications wiring inside the five-story, 6.5-million-square-foot building.

http://www.militarycity.com/sept11/fortress1.html

Cordite:

(IMG:http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e207/Mercury2/treibladung_bild_02.jpg)

Don Perkal -- 
"Even before stepping outside I could smell the cordite. Then I knew explosives had been set off somewhere."


Gilah Goldsmith -- 
"We saw a huge black cloud of smoke, she said, saying it smelled like cordite, or gun smoke."

Out of curiosity, where would this missile be fired from exactly? EXACTLY.

This post has been edited by Aldo Marquis CIT: Sep 18 2007, 11:09 AM

[saffer1]

Hi terral.

Could you provide an explanation detailing how a bow shockwave froma tomahawk crusie missile is sufficiently strong enough to knock the lamp posts over as was observed. Please detail all scientific and mathematical calculations.