Aziz El Hallan, Pentagon witness, opportunist, or Mossad Options

[Aldo Marquis CIT]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=21...543144757&hl=nl





This is a video of "Aziz El Hallan". He claims he was on his way to work with his girlfriend when he drove past the Pentagon on 9/11. He claims the plane passed over his car. He claims that the plane got sucked into the building leaving nothing on the outside. He claims it was an American Airlines 757. He claims a piece of plane landed by his car. He claims he stood out by the Pentagon for about 20 minutes. He claims he is a pilot (although I can find no record his license). Note the part where he starts to grin as the news caster breaks into a somber statement about the plane and the attack.

The question is why was he at the Navy Annex less than 5 minutes after the event and where is his girlfriend?

(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/aziz3.jpg)

I noticed him while staring at the Jason Ingersoll photos. Interestingly, this photo is omitted from the sequence of photos released by the DoD, noted in WD's posts.

Here is the photo missing from your links WD:

(IMG:http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e207/Mercury2/DSC_0404.jpg)


EDIT: Turned on /doHTML/ for this forum

This post has been edited by Aldo Marquis CIT: Nov 13 2008, 05:02 PM

[SPreston]

Well, you'll get no support from me on it. It is needless conjecture and makes my job harder.

People DID NOT see a global hawk or small military plane. People DID NOT see a missile.

It was not there. You are creating a fantasy that does not have to exist. You want to go out and find support for this by critically analysing all the evidence and interviewing people, I am all for it.

But look how much sh*t we get just for suggesting a flyover. Why would you convolute the message?

Please, we have done the missile, the global hawk. The sh*t was all a ploy. It kept us busy doing nothing but theorizing which simply lends to this.

When you say "stalled", do you think that creating more conspiracy theories is going to "unstall it"?

We are not stalled. We are outnumbered. And it frustrates me that an ardent supporter who seems to get it, is going off on needless conspiracy theories that have already been debunked.

Why did we even go out there if you were all going to go back to theorizing, like what we researched and actually investigated doesn't even matter?

We have enough evidence to start focusing the magnifying glass.

Please think about what you are doing.

I brought out the factual times the clocks stopped inside the Pentagon and focused attention on that. That is not important? I've focused on many things which have not harmed the North of the Citgo flight path such as the fact that Reagan National was open all morning until the national order to ground all North American air traffic. I have focused on the fact that an aircraft as large as a 757 couldn't possibly have fit into the first floor area above the unmelted cable spools. How does that harm the North of Citgo flight path? I'm not pursuing a missile or Global Hawk or Skywarrior theory. I'm just commenting on them and helping to keep interest up. Many of these people who mostly support you guys have interests in these alternate theories. Since I am convinced that the two security videos were faked, then the white hot initial explosion which resembles a missile strike against the Pentagon is based on manufactured government evidence and not verifiable evidence. I will support the North of the Citgo flight path witness testimonies because they seem factual and I don't expect you or Craig to comment on these little sidelines. I am always thinking about what I am doing. If I return to the silly LC Forum, I will focus more on the North of the Citgo flight path there. These people here at PFT are much more open-minded and easier to get along with. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)