A Few New Pics Of The Plane Part Found On The Roof, of WTC 5 |

Sep 8 2007, 01:12 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Polymeta.com search Sibel Edmonds bradblog Group: Library team Posts: 1,696 Joined: 15-October 06 Member No.: 77 |
These seem to have been taken on 9/24/2001, based on info in a couple of the photos in the set and the general progress in clearing Vesey street. Included here more for context than anything else... you can make out the plane part on the roof in a couple of them.
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=10...89916367&size=o http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=10...89916367&size=o |
|
|
|
![]() |
May 27 2008, 03:23 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
Based on the logic and CAD dimensions from:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....&p=10460675, Boeing 757 windows typically measure 10.0" W ( 0.254 m) x 14.0" H ( 0.356 m) in the "real world" from a Boeing CAD drawing. When I look at Waterdancer's closeup photo (with the construction worker), I measured the left window in GIMP at 16.0 pixels W x 21.1 pixels high, which suggests a "scale factor" of 1.60 pixel/real world inch ( or rwi). The window "aspect" here was 1.31875 The right window measured at 19.1 pixels W x 21.2 pixels H, with an "aspect" of 1.109947644- this seems skewed IMHO. I measured the fuselage "height" at 54.7 pixels (measured parallel to window "height"). If I use the 1.60 pixel/rwi scale factor, this gives 54.7 / 1.60 or 34.1875 inches "high." I measured the fuselage "length" at 141.2 pixels (up to the apparent building siding). 141.2 / 1.6 gives 88.25 inches "long." Similar scale transformations could be done for the 1.91 pixel/rwi factor, but I find the 1.60 scale factor to be much closer to the 1.40 CAD "scale factor, so I used that value. These are of course approximations, but what other numbers have we got at this point, since the FBI has not produced this piece of "evidence" 6.5 years later? FWIW, I estimated the visible portion of the construction worker's "height" at 67 pixels, (but he is much "deeper" into this field of view). With the proximity of the "fuselage" to the WTC5 roof door/stairwell in the above photo, is it unreasonable to hypothesize that this approximately steel "man door"-sized (36" x 80") aluminum "fuselage" might have been planted from inside WTC5, possibly by 2 men? Admins: while the gray color suggests UA175, should this thread be moved to the WTC location section, as we can more definitely determine this to be the roof of WT5 than which flight this/these piece(s) came from? Fire, dust, and shadow could all contribute to the dark color seen in the photo. EDIT: This is Strange Coincidence #119 at: http://www.nc911truth.org/911_Coincidences.html "Only existing photo of 'Flight 175' windowed fuselage atop WTC5, featured in Popular Mechanics, was not taken until Oct 25, and was found ON TOP of cladding from the collapse of WTC1, not under it, 6 feet from the roof access door " The original photo is at: http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photodata...ginal/12390.jpg EDIT2: EXIF data for the original FEMA photo above indicates: Camera model: Canon PowerShot S300 Software: Adobe Photoshop CS Windows Date modified: 2005:01:12 14:51:36 Artist: Gene Corley Date taken: 2001:10:25 17:03:56 Hmmm... This post has been edited by dMole: May 29 2008, 06:37 AM |
|
|
|
waterdancer A Few New Pics Of The Plane Part Found On The Roof Sep 8 2007, 01:12 AM
genghis6119 i can't see anything that looks like plane par... Sep 17 2007, 02:54 AM
waterdancer RE: A Few New Pics Of The Plane Part Found On The Roof Sep 17 2007, 08:13 AM
Killtown QUOTE (waterdancer @ Sep 17 2007, 07:13 A... May 27 2008, 03:42 PM
Leslie Landry QUOTE (waterdancer @ Sep 17 2007, 08:13 A... May 28 2008, 09:48 PM
amazed! Thanks Waterdancer! I had seen that picture o... Sep 17 2007, 10:17 AM
painter WD, where did you get picture #1? Did it already h... Sep 17 2007, 11:21 AM
Cary Great observation Painter. Sep 17 2007, 06:29 PM
waterdancer QUOTE (painter @ Sep 17 2007, 03:21 PM)WD, wh... Sep 17 2007, 10:31 PM
genghis6119 i've seen the fuselage piece a few times and y... Sep 19 2007, 06:28 AM
BaNoyes Lets see if I have this right
Flight 175 goes enti... Jan 18 2008, 11:20 AM
amazed! Ba
Your absolutely right--there is something susp... Jan 18 2008, 08:35 PM
tit2 "Nothing suspicious about that":
http:/... Jan 19 2008, 01:54 PM
Kesha QUOTE (dMole @ May 27 2008, 07:23 AM) EDI... Jun 10 2008, 01:24 PM
dMole Looking at the much better quality FEMA original p... May 27 2008, 09:33 AM
dMole In case people missed it, that "fuselage... May 29 2008, 06:49 AM
amazed! So that photo is photoshopped?
I'm telling yo... Jun 5 2008, 10:13 PM
dMole Thanks Kesha,
The Wiki links to W. Gene Corley... Jun 10 2008, 01:39 PM
Kesha QUOTE (dMole @ Jun 10 2008, 06:39 PM) Tha... Jun 11 2008, 01:37 PM
waterdancer For a similar view of the roof of WTC 5, I recomme... Jun 15 2008, 04:33 AM
dMole Thanks WD,
I didn't get EXIF data off that FE... Jun 15 2008, 04:56 AM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 08:35 PM |