Leuren Moret Video, She saw a missile coming on TV |

![]() ![]() |
Sep 26 2007, 02:43 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 202 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 126 |
911 Truth International Conference in Tokyo
This video is little bit old but I just found it so I just wanted let you know in case some of you have never seen this. She saw a missile coming on TV. This video is little bit annoying because of translation for Japanese. But she is pretty sure that a cruise missile punched through Pentagon. Leuren... / Zap This post has been edited by Zapzarap: Sep 27 2007, 12:40 PM |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2007, 04:28 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 202 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 126 |
Depleted Uranium part 1
I found the other her lecture. She is saying scary thing. |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 09:59 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 3,773 Joined: 14-December 06 From: Fort Pierce, FL Member No.: 331 |
I'm going to Google the woman, but wondered if anybody here knows anything about her? Conflicting spelling on the name, Lauren or Leuren?
Thanks |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 10:01 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Contributor Posts: 1,168 Joined: 16-August 06 Member No.: 10 |
QUOTE (shoon @ Sep 26 2007, 06:43 PM) She saw a missile coming on TV. She did not see a missile coming. Did she actually say this? This post has been edited by Aldo Marquis CIT: Sep 27 2007, 10:01 AM |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 10:24 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 202 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 126 |
My mistake. I knew her name is Leuren but I typed wrong.
I hope somebody can fix it. I was wrong about what she said again. A woman, who was working at Pentagon and right above the missile, watched the object coming on internal TV @ 7'40" of this video. I am sorry Japanese translation confused me. The problem here is they do have good videos other than the famous frames. This post has been edited by shoon: Sep 27 2007, 10:41 AM |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 10:45 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Contributor Posts: 1,168 Joined: 16-August 06 Member No.: 10 |
QUOTE (shoon @ Sep 27 2007, 02:24 PM) My mistake. I knew her name is Leuren but I typed wrong. I hope somebody can fix it. I was wrong about what she said again. A woman, who was working at Pentagon and right above the missile, watched the object coming on internal TV @ 7'40" of this video. I am sorry Japanese translation confused me. The problem here is they do have good videos other than the famous frames. There was no missile. |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 12:12 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 202 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 126 |
Here is a transcript that I made. If you find any mistake, please let me know. I only wrote down the part that is directly related to Pentagon.
On the morning of 9/11, at 5 in the morning the subway at Pentagon was full of military personnel and guard dogs. This is not normal. When the object hit Pentagon, it impacted in area called Naval intelligent which has just been retro fitted. And we know now that the object hit Pentagon was a cruise missile. The missile also went through the department of accounting. It killed 85 people and destroyed computers with much data on it. This is very important because when Doug Zakaim(?) who is a joint Israel and American citizen was working in Pentagon, 3 and half trillion dollars disappeared form Pentagon. So the cruise missile, which destroyed accounting department, made it impossible to trace the money that disappeared. Doug Zakahim, when he left Pentagon, went almost directly to Israel. And Donald Ramified and other people involved in 9/11 and White House administration have ignored 3 and half trillion dollars that disappeared. The object, the missile, hit Pentagon left a round bullet hole through Pentagon. That was no plane that impacted Pentagon. It went through 4 layers of very, very strong walls cement walls before exited Pentagon. And it left very large bullet hole or punch out at the exit hole. Right after the object hit Pentagon, I found a medical doctor living twelve miles from Pentagon. I told her to call FBI and emergency response agency and get all of the emergency workers in full protective gear and air tank on their back. At that time, I thought a plane that hit Pentagon and depleted uranium is used in commercial aircraft. I did not want to emergency workers get poisoned. Depleted uranium burns and forms radio active poison gas. It goes everywhere and very long distances. I also told the medical doctor to take Geiger counter out of her purse. I knew she had Geiger counter in her purse into do air monitoring. Within five hours after the missile hit Pentagon she called me back and she said the radiation levels of 8 to 10 times higher than normal. Two day after the cruise missile hit Pentagon, EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, called and confirmed that Pentagon crush site was contaminated with depleted uranium. The bullet hole fourteen-foot bullet hole through the Pentagon is the signature of kinetic energy penetrater in other words depleted uranium warhead was in cruise missile. In the military magazine for officers, a woman working in the floor above the hole described watching the object on television hit Pentagon one floor below her. And when it was over she and other workers walked out of the building. It was on television. Yeah, they were in the office. Internal TV. Nobody even had scratch because it was bullet hole through the building. There was no other damage. Yes. It seems that explosion and all of the fire out side Pentagon came from a workers hut, temporary building right in front of Pentagon or perhaps a truck. It was an explosion before the object hit Pentagon. Jimmy Walter has just given information of clock. Clock stopped at 9:32 am in Pentagon. Missile hit the building 9:35 am. In order to hide the bullet hole, which would have been obvious to the public if it would have been broadcasted on national television, the military collapsed that part of the building with cookie cuter demolition. Cookie cut straight up and down. This post has been edited by shoon: Sep 27 2007, 12:12 PM |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 12:15 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Contributor Posts: 1,168 Joined: 16-August 06 Member No.: 10 |
She has no idea what she is talking about. There is no evidence of a missile.
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 12:17 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 202 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 126 |
Now I ask myself. I wonder where she was. She seemed to be at Pentagon. I wonder if she saw the object that punced out.
Please let me know if you find any articles or her lectures that shows where she was. |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 12:22 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 202 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 126 |
Aldo Marquis CIT,
She sounds that she was directing at that moment. So she knows what she is talking about. She seems to know more than you unless you are the one who wants to conceal the facts. |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 12:40 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Contributor Posts: 1,168 Joined: 16-August 06 Member No.: 10 |
QUOTE (shoon @ Sep 27 2007, 04:22 PM) Aldo Marquis CIT, She sounds that she was directing at that moment. So she knows what she is talking about. She seems to know more than you unless you are the one who wants to conceal the facts. Shoon, She was NOT there. She is some lady who wrote up some kind of environmental assessment report that von kleist used in his In Plane Site. She claims she or someone she knows went to the Pentagon and used a radioactivity detector or whatever in her purse and thinks a missile hit. She has no idea what she is talking about. I am a researcher who speaks with witnesses, first responders, rescuers, bystanders, reporters, cameramen, photographers, victims. See my signature. If you haven't seen our evidence, perhaps you should stop posting irrelevant info and learn. |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 02:00 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Ragin Cajun Group: Valued Member Posts: 3,691 Joined: 14-August 06 From: Baton Rouge, LA Member No.: 5 |
Question for the CIT team.
If nothing hit the Pentagon, where did all the small parts of "something" come from? I'm not saying anything hit the Pentagon. I'm just wondering how all those small pieces of whatever come from. Could they have been planted on the Pentagon lawn? Sure, but that would have required some serious maneuvering right after an explosion. I know it's speculation, but that's all we have right now. |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 02:25 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 1,072 Joined: 15-October 06 Member No.: 75 |
QUOTE (Cary @ Sep 27 2007, 06:00 PM) Question for the CIT team. If nothing hit the Pentagon, where did all the small parts of "something" come from? We believe they were blown out of these construction trailers that were completely obliterated: (IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/Pentagon%20folder%202/constructiontrailerscomposit.jpg) |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 03:14 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 3,773 Joined: 14-December 06 From: Fort Pierce, FL Member No.: 331 |
Craig
I assume those photos are from something like Google Earth for a time period preceding 9/11? What you say sounds plausible. Leuren Moret is a scientist and investigator, and apparently well-respected, specializing in the matter of DU. I am sympathetic to her cause. DU poisons the earth and any and all humans, including our guys in uniform, once it is used. It should be outlawed by international convention, IMO. Apparently she was certainly NOT at the Pentagon that morning, but was concerned about the possibility of DU dust for the first responders. Her information about the Navy part, and the auditors and missing $ is what I've read elsewhere. She confirms that much, but I wonder where she got her information about that. |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 03:51 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Contributor Posts: 1,168 Joined: 16-August 06 Member No.: 10 |
Let's not forget that they cleared everyone out of the area at one point because they thought another plane was inbound. That could have been a time they planted AA debris.
Robert Turcios told me it was 10 minutes after and told him tog et out of the area. |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 03:59 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 202 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 126 |
Cruise missiles have Turbo fan engine and wings. Some of them are as big as jets.
So broken pieces at Pentagon would be a broken cruise missile. I agree with you that the large jets passed by CITGO and it landed at Ronald Regan Washington National Airport. But no missile theory ignores Edwards account and knocked down poles. I do not know about timming. We can forget about the clock because I have seen clocks showing wrong time in USA. Even THE evidence at Pentagon showed wrong date. This post has been edited by shoon: Sep 27 2007, 04:35 PM |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 04:09 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Contributor Posts: 1,168 Joined: 16-August 06 Member No.: 10 |
Whatever, dream up whatever fantasy you want.
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 04:13 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 45 Joined: 14-September 07 From: Banana Republic of Germany Member No.: 2,136 |
Here is an article about radiation measured:
http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/content/view/1895/81/ QUOTE Around the Pentagon there were reports of high radiation levels after 9-11 American Free Press has documentation that radiation levels in Alexandria and Leesburg, Va., were much higher than usual on 9-11 and persisted for at least one week afterward. In Alexandria, seven miles south of the burning Pentagon, a doctor with years of experience working with radiation issues found elevated radiation levels on 9-11 of 35 to 52 counts per minute (cpm) using a "Radalert 50" Geiger counter. One week after 9-11, in Leesburg, 33 miles northwest of the Pentagon, soil readings taken in a residential neighbourhood showed even higher readings of 75 to 83 cpm. "That's pretty high," Cindy Folkers of the Washing ton-based Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS) told AFP. Folkers said 7 to 12 cpm is normal background radiation inside the NIRS building, and that outdoor readings of between 12 to 20 cpm are normal in Chevy Chase, Md., outside Washington. The Radalert 50, Folkers said, is primarily a gamma ray detector and "detects only 7 percent of the beta radiation and even less of the alpha." This suggests that actual radiation levels may have been significantly higher than those detected by the doctor's Geiger counter. "The question is, why?" Folkers said. If the radiation came from the explosion and fire at the Pentagon, it most likely did not come from a Boeing 757, which is the type of aircraft that allegedly hit the building. "Boeing has never used DU on either the 757 or the 767, and we no longer use it on the 747," Leslie M. Nichols, product spokesperson for Boeing's 767, told AFP. "Sometime ago, we switched to tungsten, because it is heavier, more readily available and more cost effective." The cost effectiveness argument is debatable. A waste product of U.S. nuclear weapons and energy facilities, DU is reportedly provided by the Department of Energy to national and foreign armament companies free of charge. DU is used in a wide variety of missiles in the U.S. arsenal as an armor penetrator. It is also used in the bunker-buster bombs and cruise missiles. Because no photographic evidence of a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon is available to the public, 9-11 skeptics and independent researchers claim something else, such as a missile, struck the Pentagon. A white flash, not unlike those seen in videos of the planes as they struck the twin towers, occurs when a DU penetrator hits a target. Workers and FEMA officials at the Pentagon were seen wearing special protective outfits and respirators. FEMA photos show the workers going through decontamination procedures. Bellinger told AFP that the U.S. Department of Defense was responsible for on-site safety procedures at the Pentagon. A question in general: Is the structure of the Pentagon reinforced outer wall's published somewhere? One could think a DU shielded missile is needed to break such a wall. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/charge.gif) INP |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 04:21 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 202 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 126 |
I have one more question. People said the wall was reinforced. Do you think it is true? No body can know if the wall was reinforced or not since it has been destoyed now. I can be quite oppsite. Since they were about to destroy this part, they might have made it weaker instead of stronger.
The holes on the wall were very inline and line up with poles so I think it would be harder to set up or cover up like that. It would be much easier to shoot a missile to make inline holes and knock down poles. Aldo Marquis CIT: You act like anti 9/11 truther. You got to open up your mind. I think your job was great. I changed my mind because of your work. I used to think they launched a missile from Navy Annex parking lot. But it is inconsitent with Edward account. This post has been edited by shoon: Sep 27 2007, 04:34 PM |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2007, 04:21 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 1,072 Joined: 15-October 06 Member No.: 75 |
QUOTE (amazed! @ Sep 27 2007, 07:14 PM) Craig I assume those photos are from something like Google Earth for a time period preceding 9/11? What you say sounds plausible. Leuren Moret is a scientist and investigator, and apparently well-respected, specializing in the matter of DU. I am sympathetic to her cause. DU poisons the earth and any and all humans, including our guys in uniform, once it is used. It should be outlawed by international convention, IMO. Apparently she was certainly NOT at the Pentagon that morning, but was concerned about the possibility of DU dust for the first responders. Her information about the Navy part, and the auditors and missing $ is what I've read elsewhere. She confirms that much, but I wonder where she got her information about that. It has been confirmed that the trailers were there. The top image is from 9/7/2001. Remember there had been a renovation going on for years. She may be reporting a lot of good information but she is simply mistaken in regards to the Missile. This is common and doesn't automatically mean that she is disinfo. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 10:57 AM |