The Mega-lie Called The "war On Terror", Masterpiece of Propaganda Options

[André]

A tectonic groundswell of scepticism, doubt and suspicion has emerged about the Bush administration's official explanation of 9/11. Some claim the administration orchestrated the attacks. Others see complicity. Still others find criminal negligence. The cases they make are neither extreme nor trivial.

Whatever the truth about 9/11, the Bush administration now had a fortuitous, spectacular opportunity to proceed with its premeditated attacks.

http://www.alternet.org

[Sanders]

Thanx for posting that, Andre - great article !

Some might call me crazy, but I am convinced that the so called "war on terror" was conceived during the mid-seventies. It all started with Zbigniew's book, "Between Two Ages", which his friend and mentor David Rockefeller was taken with. That was the inspiration for the Trilateral Commission, co-founded by the two of them in 1973. From there, Trilateral member Jimmy Carter was given the White House and Brzezinsky became Nat. Security Advisor, and advised Carter to fund a covert op along the Soviet Afghan border, to arm Islamic insurgents and get them to strike at targets inside the Soviet border - Brzezinski has admitted that he convinced Carter to do this. After the 10 year war that followed the Soviet Union collapsed.

This was the plan all along - from the mid seventies it was decided to shift the primary global conflict from the US/Soviet cold war arena to a war on terrorism centered in the Middle East and Central Asia - where all the resources are, a new "Arc of Crisis" in Brzezinski's words.

The Soviet Union didn't "just" collapse suddenly - that took some doing, and we know that Rockefeller's influence in Russia had always been substantial.

As soon as the Soviet Union had collapsed, Big Oil was on the newly independent republics of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan like a duck on a june bug, conducting surveys and buying up exploration rights, while back home Brzezinski and his protoge Samuel Huntington began to ring the warning bells of a new emerging threat to global security, Islamic fundamentalistm (the same "threat" Brzezinski had been busy fomenting for the previous decade).

And as the 90's continued the lie began to take shape and come more and more into focus - with a slew of Hollywood movies that portrayed Islamic terrorists as the bad-guys, with an increasingly arrogant foreign policy which fostered hatred of the US in that part of the world, with attacks in Africa and New York and elsewhere (carried out by US intelligence agencies in collusion with terrorist groups), with the emergence of the Taliban (which the CIA and Pakistan supported from the begining!), with Bin Laden's call for Jihad in 1998, the USS Cole incident, and finally, with 9/11.

Yeah, it's Mega-lie all right, a yarn they've been weaving for 30 years.

[p.w.rapp]

Precisely!
Excellent sumary, Sanders!
Everything in a nutshell.

You were looking for a topic introduction of "War On Terror" in the Library?

You've just written a perfect one!

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif) Zap

[jadenter]

Some might call me crazy, but I am convinced that the so called "war on terror" was conceived during the mid-seventies.  It all started with Zbigniew's book, "Between Two Ages", which his friend and mentor David Rockefeller was taken with. 

Has any one else wondered why and how two men from foreign countries, Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, exert so much influence on American foreign policy? Who selected these men? They are both advisors to different party presidents and had massive influence on our government. We know that foreign bankers and money are deeply involved on the Federal Reserve and our monetary policies. Who really are they working for and who pays them what I would assume are huge salaries, commissions, or consulting fees?

Can't America educate and create people like these men in our own country?

[amazed!]

Great post Sanders!

Having just watched Aaron Russo's "America, From Freedom to Fascism", the bankers and the bad guys took control with the passage of the 16th amendment and the Federal Reserve Act.

Since that time they have consolidated their power. Even Ike could not stand up to it.

[Sanders]

There's another guy who was instrumental in writing about the new "terror threat" in the early 90's, "Clash of Civilizations" and all that... in England. Bernard something?? Something Bernard??? I forgot his name (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/doh1.gif) . Someone help me out??


As for the above coments, you guys are too kind.

It really is just like that. Excactly when Rockefeller, Brzezinski, Kissinger (and others?) started formulating this no one knows for sure of course, but it had to be before the onset of the Soviet Afghan conflict in 1979. It's just too obvious. There had to be a reason to for Brzezinski to want to go after the Soviets, and for the elite to want to topple the Soviet Union - AS IF THOSE GUYS BELIEVE THE "EVIL EMPIRE" CRAP REAGAN SPOUTED! HAHAHAHA. They LOVED the Soviet Union - , a central government control experiment, an impetus to spend billions on nukes in both countries, it served many purposes. There had to be both a reason for the ruling elite to want to destroy it, and there had to be a mechanism for it to just implode like that. The Soviet Afghan war was part of it, but there had to be much more going on there I'm sure.

One of the more interesting things that no one talks about is why the US (with Pakistan's help) put the Taliban in power. An Argentinian company, Bridas Group, got the jump on Big Oil and signed a contract with the Rabbani regime in Afghanistan in the early 90's to build a pipeline. The powers that be, via the CIA and Pakistani ISI throwing their weight behind the Taliban, threw out Rabbani in order to void that contract - in fact the Bridas Group even sued UNOCAL in the Texas courts over it (it was thrown out). The Taliban's takeover of Kabul in 96 (97?) was nothing short of "shock and awe". Does anyone think a bunch of Madras intellectuals could barnstorm Afghanistan (who the English were never able to subdue throughout history) and succeed lickedy spit all on their own?

No way. The US was behind that too.

[Sanders]

Has any one else wondered why and how two men from foreign countries, Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, exert so much influence on American foreign policy? Who selected these men?

Brzezinski is Polish, Kissinger is, er, what, shall I say, Zionist??

I always got the feeling that Brzezinski and Kissinger represent the Rockefeller and Rothschild camps, respectively, in the halls of the US government.

Just a gut feeling though, there is no hard evidence for Rothschild influence - hasn't been for a very long time - one can only speculate. I do know that Kissinger and Richard Perle are pretty close (various business connections) - which is interesting, because Kissinger's foreign policy mindset and the Neocon foreign policy mindset are entirely different...

Anyway, there's your "terrorist threat" right there, that cabal of "business and polical leaders".

[Cary]

Kissenger is German. He came to the US in 1938. He served in the US Army Intelligence, the precursor to the CIA. Educated at Harvard. Imagine that.

Yes, they're on competing factions of the globalists, but they're on the same team in the bigger picture.

[Devilsadvocate]

Yes, they're on competing factions of the globalists, but they're on the same team in the bigger picture.

Precisely. To that, add a group of disgruntled CIA-employees who took on a life of their own- and Bingo !
Instant "Mother of all problems"...
There seems to be a direct line from people like Brzezinski and Kissinger, Ted Shackley and Richard Secord, right up to Shackley's successors- especially Negroponte. Well possible that some of them have begun to have second thoughts.
(At least Brzezinski sometimes sounds as if he doesn't know what he wants...)
One way or another, they have created a Frankenstein-monster.

This post has been edited by Devilsadvocate: Oct 1 2007, 01:55 PM

[amazed!]

Bernard Shaw was a British playwright during that period. He wrote Pygmalion and others, probably some prose too. I think he was considered a socialist.

[p.w.rapp]

Kissenger is German.

If Eric Hufschmid read that, he'd need an oxygen-tent. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)

[Devilsadvocate]

Hehe...I hate to admit it, but Rumsfeld's forefathers came from Germany as well...
A guy called Hermann, I believe- in 1866... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)


BTW: George Bernard Shaw was Irish!
(What are you trying to do: Give Heliweli and me a fit ? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) )

This post has been edited by Devilsadvocate: Oct 1 2007, 05:56 PM

[Cary]

Kissenger is German.

If Eric Hufschmid read that, he'd need an oxygen-tent. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)

Why so? It's documented very well that Kissenger is a German Jew that emigrated to the US in 1938. What's the problem with that? Call me a dumbass, but I just don't follow Huff N Puff anymore. Not for a long time.

[Sanders]

Naah, it's not Bernard Shaw. This is driving me crazy - I'll have to go digging ...

[p.w.rapp]

Cary,

I don't follow Hufschmid either.

One thing I (and you) know about him is, that he (rather one-dimensionally) sees a Zionist conspiracy behind every aspect of 9/11, including most of the truth movement.
So he would certainly have a big problem with attributing Kissinger's enormous power and influence to the fact, that he was born in Germany.
Hufschmid may even doubt, that Brzezinski is really Catholic. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Jadenter's question...

Has any one else wondered why and how two men from foreign countries, Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, exert so much influence on American foreign policy? Who selected these men?

...was the reason, why are on to that, isn't it?

I guess the answer, Jadenter has in mind is: the Pope selected them!

Wikinews knows more (surprisingly not censored):
Iranian state broadcaster Voice of Islamic Republic of Iran has published a report on its English-language web site outlining a theory of an alleged conspiracy involving Pope Benedict XVI and former U.S. secretary of state Dr. Henry Kissinger. The report revives earlier claims of a Papal-Jewish conspiracy reported by some media outlets in Arab and Muslim countries.
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Iranian_radio_...piracy_theories


And also Pope Benedict XVI was born in ... Germany!
Strictly speaking appr. 10 miles from the border to Austria near the city of Braunau (!)


Only logical conclusion:

The Catholic Pope is pulling the strings.

The true power behind the War on Terror against Islam is CATHOLIC!

Kissinger and Brzezinski are just puppets of the Vatican.

So all Islamic terrorists in Iran, Irak and all Arab countries assemle for the mother of all terrorist attacks against Germany, Austria, Italy especially Rome and the Vatican!
Only that can stop the wars and genocides against your people, led by...
... the US and Israel...


(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)


[/logical conclusion]


The 'Clash of Civilizations' is scripted between Muslims and Christians!

[jadenter]

Jadenter's question...

Has any one else wondered why and how two men from foreign countries, Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, exert so much influence on American foreign policy? Who selected these men?

I guess the answer, Jadenter has in mind is: the Pope selected them!

Only logical conclusion:

The Catholic Pope is pulling the strings.

The true power behind the War on Terror against Islam is CATHOLIC!

Kissinger and Brzezinski are just puppets of the Vatican.

Zap,

The question about the origins of Kissinger and Brzezinski in the geopolitical foreign policies of the USA from the right and the left, repectfully, was a sincere question.

There was no intent to argue that their source of power and influence came from the Papacy and/or the Jesuit's. However, I did read somewhere recently that Kissinger is now presenting himself as a consultant to the Vatican, in addition to his clients in the Arab/Muslim oil wars. In addition, Kissinger is providing weekly private advise to GW Bush on the Middle East concerning Iraq/Iran/Syria, etc.

The question we were discussing down in the Religion Forum under the topic of Jesuits was who resides at the peak or pinnacle of the pyramid of power on the globe. My point down there was that my current thinking was that the Vatican and the Jesuit General trumped the Zionists and Israel. Consider which of these two possible pinnacles of the power pyramid has been around longer in world history.

Brzezinski seems recently (in his Senate testimony alluding to false flags) to be cautioning against an Iran attack, because his primary focus has always been Russia. Both men are globalists, one born and raised in Germany and the other from Poland.

The 9/11 false flag attack was a catalyzing event that allowed the globalists to create a new boogey-man and launch their phoney "global war on terror", dismantle the American citizen's birth right, the Constitution and Bill of Rights, launch a couple war profiteering wars, and move closer to one world government and one world religion in control of all people and all world resources with a reduced world population.

The truth about what really happened on 9/11 may or may not stop this plan of global control. There has not been one real perpetrator held accountable and there does not appear to be any credible government or media source pursuing truth and justice in a court of law. Why?

9/11 truth is still being marginalized and placed in the same category as UFO's, and it's entirely possibe that they are related to a deeper understanding of what's really happening in this world. All the politicians talk about "the way forward", in other words, they are looking at the next ten to fifteen moves in this geopolitical chess game. Perhaps research efforts should concentrate on the end game or check-mate move of the globalists, and work backward to stop them from achieving their evil goals. That solution would require defining the actual globalists and their ultimate objective.