Hi All. Not A Pilot - Military A/c Engineer., Aviation experience and 9/11 knowledge. Options

[diesel737]

Omega,
First of all, I feel the same way about the thread but its too good not to continue it.
Next, I think the buildings were rigged. Too many eyewitness reports of the crazy security details the weeks prior, the strange power-downs, the dust accumulations in the offices(which is evident every time I do a project in the house that requires any drilling or sawing), the connection to the Securacom(?) security company. Too many shaky details to be legit.
As far as the detonation device, I still cannot ignore the "bright flash just prior to impact" theory. I am no expert on missiles or demolition or explosives, but the fireballs were rather impressive. There is no doubt that the amount of fuel involved would indeed create a massive fireball on its own, however most of it was consumed in that instant. The fires which remained inside were obviously burning but at an oxygen starved rate of efficiency clearly evident by the black smoke.
I guess IMO, the fireballs were just flashbulbs for the cameras. Dramatic flare while still deadly, but not what brought the towers down.
Going back to what I said about the weeks leading up to the day, to me the buildings had people in them at night working in secrecy. Doing what? Rigging! Freefall collapses from insufficient fires do not happen.

[Omega892R09]

I have continued arguing the case that the World Trade aspect was controlled demolition on Forums against bitter opposition. Many opponents take the line that in some way I am dishonoring the memory of all those who died. This IMHO is bluster to hide their own cognitive dissonance, ignorance or prejudice and it is they who are being dishonest.

I have posted links to examples of these exchanges on this forum at:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...wtopic=9554&hl=