IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
911 Video Shows Demolition Truck, Near WTC

painter
post Oct 5 2007, 02:23 PM
Post #1


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



Personally I don't think anyone can make too much of this. Red truck passes by at 9:20 onward. Video has been slowed down so side can be read.

Source:
http://www.blacklistednews.com/view.asp?ID=4391








height="376"
src="http://www.garagetv.be/v/S5hyKqxNYmKjbYAHfVUI4cegTOzyzwEqNJ6NSJ1x70jI1hPmLR1hUp06Fgenu2C-or/v.aspx"
quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"
wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" >


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wingmaster05
post Oct 6 2007, 01:16 AM
Post #2





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 568
Joined: 23-January 07
From: where the lorax sleeps
Member No.: 487



the true definition of a conspiracy theory, if you ask me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
datars
post Oct 8 2007, 11:46 AM
Post #3


New Terrorist in Town


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 996
Joined: 14-August 06
From: S.F. Bay Area
Member No.: 6



Manhattan Demolition

http://wordpress.com/tag/manhattan-demolition/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wingmaster05
post Oct 9 2007, 01:02 AM
Post #4





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 568
Joined: 23-January 07
From: where the lorax sleeps
Member No.: 487



Unless you can show that Manhattan Demolition had no trucks on the road that day and thus giving reason to believe an off the books job was underway, it's just grasping for straws, seeing what you want to believe, etc.

business ties to CDI would work too...(I'll look for that)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wingmaster05
post Oct 9 2007, 01:14 AM
Post #5





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 568
Joined: 23-January 07
From: where the lorax sleeps
Member No.: 487



http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/23/nyregion/23company.html

QUOTE
The John Galt Corporation of the Bronx, hired last year for the dangerous and complex job of demolishing the former Deutsche Bank building at 130 Liberty Street, where two firefighters died last Saturday, has apparently never done any work like it. Indeed, Galt does not seem to have done much of anything since it was incorporated in 1983.

Public and private records give no indication of how many employees it has, what its volume of business is or who its clients are. There are almost no accounts of any projects it has undertaken on any scale, apart from 130 Liberty Street. Court records are largely silent. Some leading construction executives in the city say they have never even heard of it.



article continues, very interesting although not really connected to Manhattan demolition. (Lower Manhattan DC is mentioned however).

Look for the key word on the second page. I started dosing off and then I read it...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
t-seeker
post Oct 9 2007, 01:15 AM
Post #6





Group: Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: 8-October 07
Member No.: 2,345



Could you indicate the time code when this truck appears?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wingmaster05
post Oct 9 2007, 01:19 AM
Post #7





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 568
Joined: 23-January 07
From: where the lorax sleeps
Member No.: 487



more on the key word

QUOTE
Prosecutors are probing allegations that a mob-linked demolition firm slipped no-show jobs into the ill-fated Deutsche Bank demolition project, the Daily News has learned.

Among those suspected of getting paid without doing any work is Bruce Greenberg, the convicted-felon brother of reputed Gambino associate Harold Greenberg, according to two sources familiar with the investigation.

Harold Greenberg was barred from getting any financial benefits from the Deutsche Bank job because of his criminal past.

The Manhattan district attorney's office is investigating whether the company that hired Bruce Greenberg, the John Galt Corp., was really controlled by his brother Harold's firm, Safeway Environmental, sources said.

Bruce Greenberg, 55, was listed as an ironworker at the bank job for a brief time earlier this year, the sources said. He recently said he was out on disability after contracting respiratory problems during the cleanup at Ground Zero after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Prosecutors are trying to determine whether Bruce Greenberg and several other Galt employees ever performed any work at the job or put in for more hours than they were entitled to, the sources said.


can't seem to find any ties to the infamous insurance assholes, Greenberg Greenberg and Greenberg.


edit:


edit: jesus, following these links around...everyone subcontracting everyone. (BTW Controlled demolition, Inc, CDI for short, is the one everyone knows about in dealing with 911 clean up, they didnt get the bid but Tully did and subcontracted it out). It seems to operate just like the war pigs do in the Mid East. Scramble for the free money from unwitting JQ Public and then do the crappiest job you can, almost begging you to be investigated. sheesh.

This post has been edited by Wingmaster05: Oct 9 2007, 01:45 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wingmaster05
post Oct 9 2007, 01:29 AM
Post #8





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 568
Joined: 23-January 07
From: where the lorax sleeps
Member No.: 487



Ha! A little digging into the demolition and clean up crews involved at ground zero leads me to a classy man, george hayduke himself...

http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...pic=14406&st=30

QUOTE
"40] Further insulating from U.S. law, WTC and Pentagon cleanup is under foreign British AMEC control--allowed to work on core U.S.'s security building. To simplify those in the know about the radiological dangers, and to limit U.S. law jurisdiction, the corporation that cleaned up WTC and Pentagon is the same: British owned AMEC. Giuliani hired more British foreign owned clean-up companies for isolating them legally from the WTC knowledge of its controlled demolition. The foreign corporations were assigned to the areas of controlled demolition in WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7. The only American clean up corporation, Tully, was kept from these areas. The companies Giuliani chose were all CEO'ed by Knights of the British Empire. AMEC of course is British as well.

[41] Giuliani is knighted by the British Empire soon after 9-11 attacks--which he illegally cleaned up without an investigation.

[42] People in Pentagon radiation suits would be under the direction of British AMEC.

[43] AMEC decision: On the other hand, civilian rescue workers that failed to get any "wash down" treatment at the WTC would be AMEC decision as well.

[44] AMEC decision: The "more important" (from the conspirators point of view) radioactive-dust ladel steel did get the "wash down" treatment--another AMEC decision. It's for the steel, instead of the workers.

[45] Soon after cleaning up, AMEC entirely leaves the U.S. in 2004."



http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341768.shtml

read the bottom half of the first page at the LC thread too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
datars
post Oct 14 2007, 02:15 PM
Post #9


New Terrorist in Town


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 996
Joined: 14-August 06
From: S.F. Bay Area
Member No.: 6



QUOTE (Wingmaster05 @ Oct 8 2007, 10:29 PM)
Ha! A little digging into the demolition and clean up crews involved at ground zero leads me to a classy man, george hayduke himself...

http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...pic=14406&st=30

QUOTE
"40] Further insulating from U.S. law, WTC and Pentagon cleanup is under foreign British AMEC control--allowed to work on core U.S.'s security building. To simplify those in the know about the radiological dangers, and to limit U.S. law jurisdiction, the corporation that cleaned up WTC and Pentagon is the same: British owned AMEC. Giuliani hired more British foreign owned clean-up companies for isolating them legally from the WTC knowledge of its controlled demolition. The foreign corporations were assigned to the areas of controlled demolition in WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7. The only American clean up corporation, Tully, was kept from these areas. The companies Giuliani chose were all CEO'ed by Knights of the British Empire. AMEC of course is British as well.

[41] Giuliani is knighted by the British Empire soon after 9-11 attacks--which he illegally cleaned up without an investigation.

[42] People in Pentagon radiation suits would be under the direction of British AMEC.

[43] AMEC decision: On the other hand, civilian rescue workers that failed to get any "wash down" treatment at the WTC would be AMEC decision as well.

[44] AMEC decision: The "more important" (from the conspirators point of view) radioactive-dust ladel steel did get the "wash down" treatment--another AMEC decision. It's for the steel, instead of the workers.

[45] Soon after cleaning up, AMEC entirely leaves the U.S. in 2004."



http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341768.shtml

read the bottom half of the first page at the LC thread too.

Thanks Wingmaster05
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Apr 6 2009, 10:29 AM
Post #10



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



Although this is related to post #7 above, "Who Killed John O'Neill," and the AIG fiasco(es), I'll post it here for posterity:

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1261.shtml
---------------------------------------------
9/11 and the Greenberg Familia
By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Associate Editor

Sep 29, 2006, 01:06

Democratic Underground Demopedia reports in Who Killed John O’Neill that at the time of 9/11, AIG, the world’s largest insurance company, and subsidiaries Marsh McLennan, ACE and Kroll, were run by the Greenberg family. With Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member Maurice “Hank” Greenberg as the AIG godfather, the Familia’s tentacles curled around the heart of the tragedy.

Hank’s son Jeffrey, a CFR member as well, was chairman of Marsh & McLennan, situated on floors throughout the North Tower of the World Trade Center as well as the top floors of the South Tower. Marsh also had ties to the CIA. Son Evan Greenberg, a CFR member, was CEO of ACE Limited, situated in Tower 7, which also contained AIG subsidiary Kroll, closely related to the CIA, also with an office in Tower 7.

Tower 7 also contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud corporate, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions.

Greenberg’s cousin, Alan “Ace” Greenberg, was former CEO of Bear Sterns, where the Bush family, Cheney family George Schultz, James Baker, et al, did business. It is the leading brokerage firm of the great and all-powerful Bush Familia.

Also reported by Democratic Underground, AIG’s Kroll “provided protection services,” among other things, to high level Americans at home and abroad. Kroll had military teams in their company and merged with Armor Holdings on August 23, 2001, adding Defence Systems Limited, another private military corporation, to their operation, and an ex-KGB team called Alpha Firm earlier acquired by Defense Systems Limited. These four teams could have been used on 9/11, part of a “corporatizing” of black ops in tandem with military teams.

According to whistleblower Richard Grove, who worked as a senior manager for SilverStream Software on Marsh and AIG accounts, Kroll also managed the Enron fraud once Kenneth Lay stepped down.

Marsh, immediately after 9/11, established a specialized terrorism team called Marsh Crisis Consultancy (led by L. Paul Bremer III), adding the teams Control Risks Group, a British ex-SAS team and Versar, bio-terrorism and homeland defense team. These players could have known each other from 9/11, bringing in new assignments and profits.

Democratic Underground also reports, AIG allegedly was laundering drug money, and was involved in the Afghanistan oil and gas pipelines. Greenberg and the Adnan Khasshogi family allegedly benefited from the Afghanistan narcotics trade and interests in the oil and gas pipelines, as well.

Greenberg’s Law Firm Connections to Bush

According to www.sourcewatch.org, the Greenbergs were and are connected to the Bush Familia via their Miami-based law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP, a 1,350-lawyer, full-service international firm. Here are a few connects . . .

1) G-T represented George W. Bush in the Bush-Gore 2000 Florida election vote recount.

2) They personally represent Florida Governor Jeb Bush.

3) They hired son of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on Election Day 2000 -- after which Justice Scalia cast one of the 5 to 4 deciding votes that placed Bush in the White House.

4) They partially funded/sponsored a delegation to Israel by House-Senate Armed Services Committee members and government contractors to witness and be briefed on interrogations resistance procedures and torture techniques.

5) The firm has prominent administrative positions in Massachusetts 9/11 Fund, which also involves Bush family banking house Brown Brothers Harriman (the same BBH involved with Prescott Bush’s bankrolling the Nazis in World War II).

6) Traurig Greenberg works with 9-11 victims on planning their US government “hushmail/bribery estates.” That is, to receive the money, the victim’s family must sign an agreement never to sue the government for any reason. Victim-wife Ellen Mariani is currently being legally harassed for not signing and for holding the Bush government’s feet to the fire.

7) Bush still owes the Greenberg Traurig firm nearly $1 million for work done by dozens of lawyers and paralegals, leaving questions why a Republican candidate would hire a Democratic lawyer from a Democratic firm. See Greenberg Traurig link above for more scandals.

Greenberg’s Relationship to Larry Silverstein

On July 24, 2001, six weeks before 9/11, Larry Silverstein took control of the lease of all the WTC buildings. This followed the Port Authority decision on April 26.

According to democraticunderground.com, the three companies who originally insured the WTC were AIG, Marsh and ACE, all run as mentioned by the Greenbergs at the time. They then sold stakes of the original contract to their competition, a technique called reinsuring.

Once the Towers came down, the reinsurers got caught holding the bag. This would inextricably tie the Greenbergs to Silverstein and the larger conspiracy of 9/11. If they had no foreknowledge of events to occur, why would the Greenbergs have unloaded so many stakes in their contract?

According to Michel Chossudovsky in Financial Bonanza behind the 9/11 Tragedy, “On October 17, 2000, eleven months before 9/11, Blackstone Real Estate Advisors, of The Blackstone Group, L.P, purchased, from Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association, the participating mortgage secured by World Trade Center, Building 7.1.” [Blackstone in 2000 also purchased a 50 percent stake in Universal Studios, producers of the myth-perpetuating Flight 93.]

“April 26, 2001 the Port Authority leased the WTC for 99 years to Silverstein Properties and Westfield America Inc.

“The transaction was authorised by Port Authority Chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg. This transfer from the New York and New Jersey Port Authority was tantamount to the privatisation of the WTC Complex. The official press release described it as ‘the richest real estate prize in New York City history.’ The retail space underneath the complex was leased to Westfield America Inc.

“On 24 July 2001, 6 weeks prior to 9/11 Silverstein took control of the lease of the WTC following the Port Authority decision on April 26.

“Silverstein and Frank Lowy, CEO of Westefield Inc. took control of the 10.6 million-square-foot WTC complex.

"Lowy leased the shopping concourse called the Mall at the WTC, which comprised about 427,000 square feet of retail space.”

“Explicitly included in the agreement was that Silverstein and Westfield ‘were given the right to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed.'’

“In this transaction, Silverstein signed a rental contract for the WTC over 99 years amounting to 3.2 billion dollars in installments to be made to the Port Authority: 800 million covered fees including a down payment of the order of 100 million dollars. Of this amount, Silverstein put in 14 million dollars of his own money. The annual payment on the lease was of the order of 115 million dollars.

“In the wake of the WTC attacks, Silverstein is suing for some $7.1 billion in insurance money, double the amount of the value of the 99 year lease.” In fact, some $5 billion was actually returned, given the multiple court-case protests of the insurers.

“The mortgaging of the WTC was handled by The Blackstone Group, headed by Peter J. Peterson, current head of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The Blackstone Group also bought a piece of Kroll in 1993 at the very same time AIG took over majority control. Henry Kissinger sits on the board of the Blackstone Group.”

By his own admission Silverstein had Tower 7 pulled by controlled internal demolition eight hours after the first two hits. No plane hit Tower 7. There were two small fires in it that were under control. In fact, it takes weeks, months to set up a building to be pulled. So his order to “pull it” catches him in a huge lie. Tower 7 may have been the nexus of the operations. That may have been the real reason to pull it. In fact, it may have been set up weeks in advance with Towers 1 and 2 for demolition. Ironically, Tower 7 is the only tower that has been rebuilt, and more opulently than its predecessor, although tenancy is about 18 percent.

Towers Taken Down for Profit and to Blame Muslims


Given the involvement of the Greenbergs and Silverstein, and other commercial entities that stood to profit hugely, it is difficult to believe 9/11 occurred at the hands of 19 rag-tag Muslims with box-cutters and the help of their leader, Osama bin Laden, sitting in a cave somewhere in Afghanistan with his laptop and dialysis equipment. The real reasons behind 9/11 were financial greed and the willingness to demonize Muslims for the “Pearl Harbor-type” act that would instigate America to wage a war on terror, pursuing PNAC’s (Project for a New American Century) goal of World Hegemony.

The latest documentary on the WTC, The 911 Mysteries from 911WeKnow.com, provides highly convincing proof that the buildings were taken down in six fatal steps. They involved the use of high-powered explosives, including thermite and/or thermate, with techniques more advanced than those of traditional controlled-demolition companies, most likely the military’s, given their bunker buster technology. The six steps are . . .

1. Pre-collapse sub-basement explosions
2. Pre-collapse interior blasts
3. Pre-collapse ground level explosions
4. Top level collapse initiation
5. Mid Collapse Squibs (explosions)
6. Final time-delayed rolls (explosions)

Without all these steps, the Towers could never have free-fallen in 10 seconds, the speed of gravity. Any obstacles or pancaking had to be eliminated otherwise the number of seconds of fall would increase dramatically. The documentary also reminds us that on February 13, 1975 there was a major fire on the 11th floor of the North Tower that did not topple it, though the loss was estimated at over $2 million, no mean event. Check it out.

It is possible that in 1996, when Securacom took over WTC security and installed a new $8.3 million security system, that the explosives and charges were also put in place. Sitting on the board of Securacom was the director Marvin Bush, George Bush’s younger brother.

In any case, this is patently the confluence of the military/industrial complex with a healthy dose of Wall Street, earning millions if not billions in put and call options on companies involved with the catastrophe, including airlines on the down (put) side and military suppliers on the up (call) side. In addition, there is the missing gold from the basement of Tower 4, $200 million of which was retrieved, and an untold amount stolen.

The real bottom line was that the Towers were two financial white elephants. And both Silverstein and Greenberg had to know that. The tenancy was dropping. They were out of date. And most dangerously, they were asbestos bombs, loaded with the dangerous building material when they were completed in 1972-73.

By law the buildings could not be taken down by internal demolition. And since it would cost a billion dollars or more to take the towers down beam by beam, it would be at great loss to the Port of Authority or its leaseholder. Thus the reasons are obvious to take WTC down in act of terror also a false-flag operation. Remember, the concept for the WTC Towers originated with the Nelson and David Rockefeller, members of the Council on Foreign Relations and among the world’s elites. A “New Pearl Harbor” would serve those interests well.

Additional Connections to Greenberg

John O’Neill, mentioned in the first paragraph, was the FBI anti-terror chief who spent years trying to track down bin Laden and “al Qaeda” members. At every point, he was stopped or frustrated by his superiors. Finally, O’Neill parted company with the FBI. Jerome Hauer, who formerly worked for Kroll, got him the job as chief of security at the WTC. On 9/11, O’Neill lost his life in the North Tower.

Mr. Hauer’s job as Kroll chief was also held by Michael Cherkasky, who came out of the New York County District Attorney’s Office, which also brought us Rudy Giuliani, Elliot Spitzer and Patrick Fitzgerald. Mr. Cherkasky also brought Mr. Spitzer into the NYC County DA’s office. Today Cherkasky is a substantial contributor to Spitzer’s campaign for New York State Governor. Cherkasky was bumped up to head Marsh McLennan in 2004.

As an aside, there were about 200 electrical engineers working in the World Trade Center around the time. Additionally, AMEC and Tully Construction played a major role in the clean up of Ground Zero and both have specialized controlled demolition companies.

Lastly, can you believe that one of the Council on Foreign Relations members who engaged President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran in a debate about the holocaust at CFR’s reception last week was none other than Hank Greenberg, who said he witnessed the Dachau camp as Germany fell? Could it all possibly be payback and then some?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DoYouEverWonder
post Apr 6 2009, 01:20 PM
Post #11





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 770
Joined: 1-February 09
Member No.: 4,096



QUOTE (dMole @ Apr 6 2009, 10:29 AM) *
Although this is related to post #7 above, "Who Killed John O'Neill," and the AIG fiasco(es), I'll post it here for posterity:
...



This is all DrDebugs' work. DemocraticUnderground just happens to be were he posted it. It's a shame DU is getting all the credit in Mazza's piece. They did nothing to deserve it.

This post has been edited by painter: Apr 6 2009, 02:45 PM
Reason for edit: shortened quote
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd September 2014 - 02:48 PM