Video Of A Plane Hitting Light Poles |

Oct 27 2007, 08:18 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 306 Joined: 28-August 07 Member No.: 1,875 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 28 2007, 12:18 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Patriotic American Group: Valued Member Posts: 518 Joined: 14-May 07 From: Where I am standing on the RUINS of the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY Member No.: 1,045 |
In the case of the light poles, the 100 ton aircraft still had hundreds of yards before it reached the Pentagon wall and needed its wings and engines to maintain lift and thrust/velocity. As the light poles sliced into the aluminum wings and fuel tanks at 530 mph and destroyed the aerodynamics of the wing surfaces, the massive 6 ton engines at full throttle would have ripped the damaged wings off themselves. At the very least, fuel would have spilled out all over the lawn which there was ZERO evidence of. Without one or both wings, the aircraft would have crashed upon the lawn, and perhaps bounced into the Pentagon wall. But there is ZERO evidence of that.
Assuming these imaginary 757 aluminum wings did hit the light poles, how did the light poles accelerate to 530+ mph in an instant in order to be thrown free of the 530 mph wings? How does a 530 mph bat squarely strike a 247 lb ball and knock it only a few feet? Shouldn't those light poles have been plastered to those wings at that speed, if not slicing into the wings or slicing right through the wings as the aircraft crash shows? Allegedly Flight 77 was flying much faster (OCT 530 mph) than the aircraft in the video, so the light poles acting as knives should have sliced off the aluminum wings more easily. Any other imaginary aircraft clipping the light poles with their aluminum wings would likely have gotten them sliced off also. But no wings or fuel from ruptured wing tanks on the lawn at all. No 100 tons of high grade aluminum 757 scrap metal lying around. No metal salvage company hired to haul it away. Nothing hit those light poles at the Pentagon because they were staged with slight of hand magicians' tricks. There was never any aircraft hitting the Pentagon. Just planted aircraft parts and planted DNA and staged events. There is no doubt. An aircraft never hit those light poles. They were staged by hand. No Flight 77 757 crashed into the Pentagon. No smaller aircraft crashed into the Pentagon. Another aircraft flew the North of Citgo flight path and overflew the Pentagon. The light poles are critical to the OCT. The 9-11 planners trapped themselves into a corner. Their slight of hand magicians' tricks have been exposed and they have been outed as traitors. |
|
|
|
Domenick DiMaggio CIT Video Of A Plane Hitting Light Poles Oct 27 2007, 08:18 PM
Craig Ranke CIT To be honest I think this analogy is not comparing... Oct 29 2007, 12:23 AM
dMole QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Oct 28 2007, 10... Oct 13 2008, 06:00 PM
SwingDangler QUOTE (Domenick DiMaggio CIT @ Oct 25 2007, 1... Oct 15 2008, 11:10 AM
dMole This (and subsequent posts) may need to be split t... Sep 23 2009, 12:30 AM
DoYouEverWonder QUOTE (dMole @ Sep 23 2009, 12:30 AM) Thi... Sep 23 2009, 05:55 AM
tnemelckram Summing up what everyone has already posted, I thi... Sep 23 2009, 10:22 AM
DoYouEverWonder QUOTE (tnemelckram @ Sep 23 2009, 10:22 A... Sep 23 2009, 01:23 PM
tnemelckram Hi DYEW!
QUOTE One more big difference here. ... Sep 23 2009, 02:07 PM
Maha Mantra The F-4 shows total vaporization of the airframe a... Feb 1 2010, 02:32 AM
rob balsamo QUOTE (Maha Mantra @ Feb 1 2010, 01:32 AM... Feb 1 2010, 03:55 AM
Paul Where is it i cannot find the video? Feb 1 2010, 03:02 AM
kawika Whoever hoaxed the Pentagon failed to take into ac... Feb 1 2010, 03:22 PM
Maha Mantra I understand the melting points of metals, aluminu... Feb 3 2010, 02:05 AM
FreshKills Where is the video that should have been in the OP... Oct 18 2011, 04:43 PM
paranoia this would have been the original video, but its u... Oct 18 2011, 07:24 PM
paranoia btw - judging by the screencaps, it appears that t... Oct 18 2011, 07:31 PM
FreshKills QUOTE (paranoia @ Oct 18 2011, 06:31 PM) ... Oct 19 2011, 06:34 PM
ronallen One thing that has always struck me as a telling f... Feb 3 2012, 04:55 PM
paranoia hey ron, have a look here:
http://s1.zetaboards.c... Feb 3 2012, 07:38 PM
onesliceshort QUOTE (paranoia @ Feb 4 2012, 12:38 AM) h... Feb 4 2012, 06:20 PM
KP50 QUOTE (onesliceshort @ Feb 5 2012, 10:20 ... Feb 8 2012, 04:16 AM
onesliceshort QUOTE (KP50 @ Feb 8 2012, 09:16 AM) Do yo... Feb 8 2012, 11:04 AM
amazed! I suspect your hunches are correct RonAllen. Welc... Feb 4 2012, 11:11 AM
KP50 Great work, thanks OSS.
I'm really time-poor ... Feb 9 2012, 04:10 AM
onesliceshort QUOTE (KP50 @ Feb 9 2012, 09:10 AM) Great... Feb 9 2012, 12:10 PM
onesliceshort QUOTE (onesliceshort)and his claim that he was hel... Feb 11 2012, 10:19 PM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 03:40 AM |