IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

Video Of A Plane Hitting Light Poles

Domenick DiMaggi...
post Oct 27 2007, 08:18 PM
Post #1





Group: Contributor
Posts: 306
Joined: 28-August 07
Member No.: 1,875



thoughts?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
SPreston
post Oct 28 2007, 12:18 PM
Post #2


Patriotic American


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 518
Joined: 14-May 07
From: Where I am standing on the RUINS of the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY
Member No.: 1,045



In the case of the light poles, the 100 ton aircraft still had hundreds of yards before it reached the Pentagon wall and needed its wings and engines to maintain lift and thrust/velocity. As the light poles sliced into the aluminum wings and fuel tanks at 530 mph and destroyed the aerodynamics of the wing surfaces, the massive 6 ton engines at full throttle would have ripped the damaged wings off themselves. At the very least, fuel would have spilled out all over the lawn which there was ZERO evidence of. Without one or both wings, the aircraft would have crashed upon the lawn, and perhaps bounced into the Pentagon wall. But there is ZERO evidence of that.

Assuming these imaginary 757 aluminum wings did hit the light poles, how did the light poles accelerate to 530+ mph in an instant in order to be thrown free of the 530 mph wings? How does a 530 mph bat squarely strike a 247 lb ball and knock it only a few feet? Shouldn't those light poles have been plastered to those wings at that speed, if not slicing into the wings or slicing right through the wings as the aircraft crash shows?

Allegedly Flight 77 was flying much faster (OCT 530 mph) than the aircraft in the video, so the light poles acting as knives should have sliced off the aluminum wings more easily. Any other imaginary aircraft clipping the light poles with their aluminum wings would likely have gotten them sliced off also. But no wings or fuel from ruptured wing tanks on the lawn at all. No 100 tons of high grade aluminum 757 scrap metal lying around. No metal salvage company hired to haul it away. Nothing hit those light poles at the Pentagon because they were staged with slight of hand magicians' tricks. There was never any aircraft hitting the Pentagon. Just planted aircraft parts and planted DNA and staged events.

There is no doubt. An aircraft never hit those light poles. They were staged by hand. No Flight 77 757 crashed into the Pentagon. No smaller aircraft crashed into the Pentagon. Another aircraft flew the North of Citgo flight path and overflew the Pentagon. The light poles are critical to the OCT. The 9-11 planners trapped themselves into a corner. Their slight of hand magicians' tricks have been exposed and they have been outed as traitors.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT   Video Of A Plane Hitting Light Poles   Oct 27 2007, 08:18 PM
- - SPreston   In the case of the light poles, the 100 ton aircra...   Oct 28 2007, 12:18 PM
- - Craig Ranke CIT   To be honest I think this analogy is not comparing...   Oct 29 2007, 12:23 AM
|- - dMole   QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Oct 28 2007, 10...   Oct 13 2008, 06:00 PM
- - SwingDangler   QUOTE (Domenick DiMaggio CIT @ Oct 25 2007, 1...   Oct 15 2008, 11:10 AM
- - dMole   This (and subsequent posts) may need to be split t...   Sep 23 2009, 12:30 AM
|- - DoYouEverWonder   QUOTE (dMole @ Sep 23 2009, 12:30 AM) Thi...   Sep 23 2009, 05:55 AM
- - tnemelckram   Summing up what everyone has already posted, I thi...   Sep 23 2009, 10:22 AM
|- - DoYouEverWonder   QUOTE (tnemelckram @ Sep 23 2009, 10:22 A...   Sep 23 2009, 01:23 PM
- - tnemelckram   Hi DYEW! QUOTE One more big difference here. ...   Sep 23 2009, 02:07 PM
- - Maha Mantra   The F-4 shows total vaporization of the airframe a...   Feb 1 2010, 02:32 AM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (Maha Mantra @ Feb 1 2010, 01:32 AM...   Feb 1 2010, 03:55 AM
- - Paul   Where is it i cannot find the video?   Feb 1 2010, 03:02 AM
- - kawika   Whoever hoaxed the Pentagon failed to take into ac...   Feb 1 2010, 03:22 PM
- - Maha Mantra   I understand the melting points of metals, aluminu...   Feb 3 2010, 02:05 AM
- - FreshKills   Where is the video that should have been in the OP...   Oct 18 2011, 04:43 PM
- - paranoia   this would have been the original video, but its u...   Oct 18 2011, 07:24 PM
- - paranoia   btw - judging by the screencaps, it appears that t...   Oct 18 2011, 07:31 PM
|- - FreshKills   QUOTE (paranoia @ Oct 18 2011, 06:31 PM) ...   Oct 19 2011, 06:34 PM
- - ronallen   One thing that has always struck me as a telling f...   Feb 3 2012, 04:55 PM
- - paranoia   hey ron, have a look here: http://s1.zetaboards.c...   Feb 3 2012, 07:38 PM
|- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (paranoia @ Feb 4 2012, 12:38 AM) h...   Feb 4 2012, 06:20 PM
|- - KP50   QUOTE (onesliceshort @ Feb 5 2012, 10:20 ...   Feb 8 2012, 04:16 AM
|- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (KP50 @ Feb 8 2012, 09:16 AM) Do yo...   Feb 8 2012, 11:04 AM
- - amazed!   I suspect your hunches are correct RonAllen. Welc...   Feb 4 2012, 11:11 AM
- - KP50   Great work, thanks OSS. I'm really time-poor ...   Feb 9 2012, 04:10 AM
|- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (KP50 @ Feb 9 2012, 09:10 AM) Great...   Feb 9 2012, 12:10 PM
- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (onesliceshort)and his claim that he was hel...   Feb 11 2012, 10:19 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 03:40 AM