Video Of A Plane Hitting Light Poles Options

[Domenick DiMaggi...]

thoughts?

[kawika]

Whoever hoaxed the Pentagon failed to take into account the trajectory. Any object hitting a surface at an angle will give up a lot of its energy. Hit it perpendicular and the energy is more compact, able to do more damage. How the hell can a flying object strike the Pentagon wall at an angle (a pretty severe angle we are told) and continue to strike objects within the Pentagon, while maintaining a striaght line? Hundreds of feet of this straight line trajectory. It is not possible!!

The Sandia test was dead on perpendicular. The fighter jet hit a solid wall, with no openings to weaken the wall surface. The Pentagon was not a solid mass of concrete. It was a flimsy mess of 60 year old masonry that crumbled to dust by the force of gravity, seen easily when the facade collapsed. It poured out like sand, for god's sake!!

Come on Sandia and NIST, give us a Pentagon wall simulation that makes first-year physics sense, will ya?

The Pentagon was accomplished, like the WTC demolition, using numerous techniques. I am convinced it was a trailer in the construction area that provided the specatacular explosion/fireball. The fireball was unafffected by any trailing vortex. It hurled small debris OUTWARDS into even the southbound lanes of Washington Blvd. Would a plane going the opposite direction do that? What is this, another JFK illusion: back and to the left? Give me a break!!

The interior straight-line damages were caused by a series of explosives placed to simulate an airliner passing straight through. The idiot who designed this forgot about the enormous sideways resistance that multiple 24" reinforced concrete columns and second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth interior concrete walls would provide. What about the edge resistance of the second and third level reinforced concrete floors? Surely this is one of the most durable elements in the building.

Outside, how come Mr. Wallace the firefighter miraculously escapes a debris field hurtling towards him from only 150 feet away? How come the two vehicles right next to the "hole" are simply set afire and not blown sideways? Because the trailer that exploded was more up, than out. How come we can't see the left wing and fuselage and tail screaming along the wall towards the heliport garage? Because they couldn't have huge pieces of a plane lying around needing to be hoisted onto trucks for everyone in the world to witness. They had to get in there but quick and tear out that section, cart everything away, just like NYC. The FBI was was there within minutes with hundreds of agents pressed into service to vacuum the area clean. I want to know about the bald-headed guy in the dress shoes and ties carrying off bits of evidence. Who directed them to do this?