B767 Or A Missile? Options

[tumetuestumefais...]

Because the question of a missile now leaves the realm of a fantasy and enters the realm of a good probability I made this poll.
More information how we came to the serious suspicion of a missile in this thread:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...topic=9179&st=0

This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Nov 11 2007, 06:46 AM

[Factfinder Gener...]

You seem to be insisting on dismissing the possibility that witnesses could have been lying about seeing the Boeing.  Do you really not regard this as a possibility, especially in light of the information presented in  this thread here?

But guys... There was the MAJORITY of witnesses in the live coverage between 8:45 to 9:03 (before the TV hoax with B767 started), they have NOT seen a B767 crash in the North Tower, just go and see... the authentic records of the live coverage are here (top of the page): http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html

...Ah, I just forget a homework: Count the proportion and then report here...
(don't count the anchors please) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

we can then compare the results...

I dont remember the exact figure, but I think the word MAJORITY is at least right.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)

I'm largely referring to South Tower Impact witnesses, Tume. I believe you're right regarding the North Tower impact. The majority of witnesses were being recorded as not having seen a large plane hit. Then, as you say, the WTC2 hoax started kicking in. There were some carefully placed "media personnel" witnesses like Jennifer Oberstein who were initially recorded as saying they didn't see a plane hit Tower 1, that on air turned this around when they definitely saw a plane hit Tower 2. What a disarmingly skillfull use of the deceptive arts is at play with this factor. At one and the same time such a display underlines the confusion over Tower 1 and asserts the falsehood about Tower 2 in a very persuasive and seemingly credible way, i.e. what the perps are planting here is the idea that no-one could easily have seen the plane hit the North Tower because it was too much of a surprise (which is BS because people should have seen a large passenger plane hit if one did) but they make the point here with JO et al that the South Tower was a different issue. You see what they were playing at with JO and why they had her say she didn't see a plane hit the North Tower? Very, very clever stuff.

This is a bit of a rambling presentation of an important point but I hope you all can get ny drift. if not I'll explain more fully? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif)

This post has been edited by Factfinder General: Nov 14 2007, 11:28 AM