B767 Or A Missile? Options

[tumetuestumefais...]

Because the question of a missile now leaves the realm of a fantasy and enters the realm of a good probability I made this poll.
More information how we came to the serious suspicion of a missile in this thread:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...topic=9179&st=0

This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Nov 11 2007, 06:46 AM

[tumetuestumefais...]

And anyway: The "Poll" about the importance of my original question is the FFG's thread - which is now realy pretty leading the most readed and replied in this section.  B)

And now I was just reading some interesting post here, and it disappeared sooner, than I was able to finish the read... who is the admin?!! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/angry.gif) Is this a CoIntelPro page??

That was me, I am an administrator here. I was attempting to answer FfG's direct question to me, but immediately after I posted it I thought twice, I thought that you, tumetuestumefaisdubien, might interpret my post as a direct criticism of your poll. I didn't want to offend you or criticise you, as a new member, and I welcome the new information you brought to us here. That's why I deleted my own post immediately after I posted it - I didn't want to post something critical of you.

The post is gone, but the jist of it is this:

Polls attempt to define the fence, and who is on which side of it. One of the barriers to constructive discussion about NPT-related topics here, is that people are enchouraged to identify with one side or the other, and identify anyone who discusses the topic as being an advocate of one side or the other. This whole idea of polling is an extension of our US "Democracy", which is simply mob-rule in a pretty package. The founders abhored the idea. Democracy and polls have their place, but they tend to DIVIDE. What we should be interested in, is evidence, not who is on which side or what percentage.

That was the jist of my post - While I wanted to adress FfG's question and explain myself, I decided it would might be percieved as a criticism of your poll, and so I deleted it.

But that post was very interesting. I don't take it as an offence when somebody criticises me. (I then realized, that the poll was maybe not a good idea even the forum offers it as a choice, and it was from my side meant more like a joke to atract people to FFG thread, than realy seriously.) I just readed your post, it was long, and then I was in meantime answering some new posts and when I came back and I just realized it disapeared, so I got a bit more angry than usualy, dont take it personaly, I feeled a bit Orwellian after all that closing of the thread and opening the discussion here... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Anyway, I don't think that the question of "NPT" should "divide" the people. On contrary I find the very concept that there is a "NPT" a ComIntelPro bogus, because most of the so called "no-planers" actually dont challenge the "planes" or something flying as not being there, they just say, it probably could'nt be a "UA175" B767-200 regular airliner. Such hypothesis anyway is not unpopular though, because UA175 was always challenged in some way by the mainstream in the 911 movement and especially by many witness reports recorded even in live TV coverage.
One should not stick the head in the sand.

One utter off topic to ilustrate the 9/11 account confusion I just have found on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVDCzymSTw8 a truck of explosives on King st. ? RC controlled plane alert before 2nd tower hit? mossad agents to "document" the events? ...the 9/11 is realy not a simple question... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/nonono.gif)

This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Nov 12 2007, 05:57 AM