Whatched it the 4th time now...
sheople around me. And the zynical, sarcastic argumentations
this Historian, Mr. Hauss, and the Journalist Mr Bröckers
"The 9/11 Comission wanted to interview President Bush.
He refused at first and but then public pressure grew.
Then he agreed but only if acompanied by his Vize-President
Cheney who was to go with him...
If you were to be called to testify and said then "I will testify but I
must bring my Papa with me and no one else can be allowed to hear
and, moreover, I will not swear an oath because I am not sure if I will
tell the truth and will not incriminate myself with my oath.",
then the judge would say, now look here, you have a few screws loose."
Once again, one can see the similarities of intelligent people from around the world. We are indeed the same and those among us who preach hatred and division will never defeat the human spirit. We have minds, brains, intellect and some still have reasoning. The bill on the damages done to the human race under the guise of 9/11 will come do and the collector will not except and I.O.U..
"Unter Falscher Flagge" achieves a tighter argument than most 9/11 Truth DVDs. Andreas Hauss dismantles with simple description the bogus OCT . The pristine passport of one highjacker found afterwards, may yet assume a position beside Building 7 as "THE" hallmarks of an obvious false flag operation.
Hauss's description how the passport made it through the tower, explosion and remained suspended upswept in the air for an hour or so until the building collapsed to finally rest on top of the debris, is a pretty simple yet damning depiction!
I found the link of Peter Zalewski, an air traffic controller, involved not only in the 9/11 episode, but the Air Egypt crash of 1999 as well--as a real gem presented to the viewer. If anyone knows more about Zalewski, I'd be glad to read your post!
It may be, some day, 9/11 will be known not as 9/11 Truth but rather 9/11 False Flag! It's clear the DVD is highly influenced by American sources but it still offers the perspective of people in another country. The Germans, both, Hauss and Brocker fall in the category of remote controlled airplanes and do it with persuasive argument! The Boeing E-4B Doomsday plane sighted over Washington DC is offered up as the control platform! I tend to believe this is the case.
It's a highly viewable presentation and goes by quickly--never tedious! Thanks for the link!
Absolutely - great points
I was also struck by these two points. To those who are reading this post - please re-read these two points again (below) as they are really powerful: (and if you haven't viewed the video - be sure to. There is something very powerfiul about seeing the Official Conspiracy Theory through the eyes of non-Americans.
The blatant absurdity of it is crystal clear to these people who do not have the American emotional bias.
"Hauss's description how the passport made it through the tower, explosion and remained suspended upswept in the air for an hour or so until the building collapsed to finally rest on top of the debris, is a pretty simple yet damning depiction!
I found the link of Peter Zalewski, an air traffic controller, involved not only in the 9/11 episode, but the Air Egypt crash of 1999 as well--as a real gem presented to the viewer. If anyone knows more about Zalewski, I'd be glad to read your post!"
It is a great film but it
It is a great film but it has two factual errors in it. That simply cannot be permitted in a story of this magnitude. Why? Because naysayers will say well if they got x, y, and z wrong, then what else did they falsely report?
If I were the producers, I would either edit or remove those sections involving Bush's brother and ABC's ties to the military industrial complex.
Excellent film, excellent point - BUT there is a flip side
First of all - this is an excellent film - one of the best I've seen.
Cornelius' point about the two factual errors is right on the money. It would be great to get the producers to correct these two errors.
The "weakness" of the two factual errors can be turned into a strength by not only admitting the two errors - but pointing them out, and then asking the question: "In an exercise of detective work, in which one is attempting to solve a crime, how does a theory with 2 errors stack up against a theory with 200 holes in it ?"
The doubter can be shown that demanding 100% accuracy of one theory, and yet accepting another theory with improbability stacked upon improbabilty, is entirely irrational. THE KEY is to get the doubter to understand that he/she is COMPARING THEORIES --- NOT APPLYING A THEORY TO A FACTUAL STORY. Helping to get others in the frame of mind to be able to look at the whole 9/11 story as an unknown event with a series of competing theories is the hard work that we must do.
what a well done film! Great examples used, such as the fires breaking out in 4 diffrent locations. Also the part about airplanes that were in the area that didn't belong there, that could of been used to fly the planes remotely & only 30 people had to know the whole plan, was an eye opener!!
Excellent documentary NuoViso, very compelling and high quality presentation !!!
Very well made and needs to be seen by many...
Thanks for your support to 9/11 Truth and Justice and all the European support...
Many thanks and best wishes
LOLOLOL Everytime I see the retards who think that 9/11 was an inside job I understand how someone such as Bush could be elected president!
Go back to the govt loyalist site forums you sad little exuse for a cognitive human being, and continue worshipping the tour guide's mole.
if anyone should be able to recognize fascism, its the German People. Kudos to the Germans for a well thought out presentation.