On January 11th 2008, Fujita Yukihisa made a 30 minute presentation at the House of Councillors (equivalent to the U.S. Senate). He directly questioned the official version of 9/11 in a session with Japanese Prime Minister Fukuda Yasuo and members of his Cabinet.
Fujita is a member of the opposition party, Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). He was elected to the House of Councillors in 2007. He is a former Member of the House of Representative and Former Vice Director General of the International Department of the Democratic Party of Japan.
Fujita emphasized that there was never an official police investigation into the deaths of the 24 Japanese citizens who were killed on 9/11.
He stated that many in the US doubt the official version of 9/11 and numerous individuals have collected evidence that contradicts the government's version, which can be seen on many websites.
During his speech, an aide showed several larges photos of:
- the Pentagon entry and exit hole and a scale overlay of a 757
- the flight path towards the Pentagon
- the WTC Twin Towers exploding
- the WTC 7 collapse
- the early announcment of the collapse of WTC 7 by the BBC and CBS
He demanded further investigation of 9/11.
This issue is being raised now as part of the discussion of whether Japan should increase its military and financial support of the "War on Terror"
Video of his presentation can be seen in three parts at Video of Speech Part 1, Part 2, Part 3
edit by rb:
English transcript/translation of above videos now available here http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=10563
edit #2 by rb: Added Videos with English Subtitles (Special thanks to the person who emailed them to us, not sure if he wants his name mentioned)
edit #3 by rb: youtube videos were removed by youtube. We have now deleted youtube part videos and embedded a single full video uploaded to google. (thanks JFK!),
Full Version: Japanese Senator Questions 9/11
Thanks Alan,
This is great news...
Sanders also put up a thread in the lobby regarding this... he lives in Japan.
Please post any developments.
Rob
This is great news...
Sanders also put up a thread in the lobby regarding this... he lives in Japan.
Please post any developments.
Rob
Hey folks, this is BIG. This is like, Joe Biden coming out for 9/11 Truth and doing a presentation of the evidence on the Senate floor.
Unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
This IS big! 
Of course the US media will not talk about it, but that is to be expected.
More and more people are beginning to understand the inside job nature of the event. In the past week I have spoken to 4 people about it and all were receptive.
Of course the US media will not talk about it, but that is to be expected.
More and more people are beginning to understand the inside job nature of the event. In the past week I have spoken to 4 people about it and all were receptive.
Some rough translations have been posted at 9/11 Blogger in the comments.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/13340
Sanders, I'm finding that the videos at 9/11 Blogger are not the same as the videos at the link below, though there is much overlap:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=dawasa1357
Also, I like this second set of videos (Dawasa1357) better because it appears to be directly from NHK, and doesn't have all the links that include iffy websites. (Good. Alan Miller used these.)
It looks like the first video at 9/11 Blogger is not included in the second set, and that the third video in the second set is not included at 9/11 Blogger. I haven't made a close comparison, though.
Regardless, there could be more, and I want to get a complete set of Fujita's presentation and the ministers' responses, beginning to end. I'm thinking it ends with the speech of party president Ozawa, in the third video of the Dawasa1357 set. I'm thinking it begins with the first video of the set at 9/11 Blogger, where Fujita refers to prior questions.
I think, but am not sure, he was referring to these questions of 11/28/2007:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/13340#comment-174198
Ideally, I would like a Japanese transcript, which is easier and more accurate to translate.
Actually, ideally, a professional translator would do this, and someone would make subtitled videos. But I'm willing and able to help translate if there is a group forming.
I would suggest contacting Mr. Fujita's office to see if a transcript is available, and if it has been translated. What about the U.S. Embassy? Might they have a translation?
http://www.911blogger.com/node/13340
Sanders, I'm finding that the videos at 9/11 Blogger are not the same as the videos at the link below, though there is much overlap:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=dawasa1357
Also, I like this second set of videos (Dawasa1357) better because it appears to be directly from NHK, and doesn't have all the links that include iffy websites. (Good. Alan Miller used these.)
It looks like the first video at 9/11 Blogger is not included in the second set, and that the third video in the second set is not included at 9/11 Blogger. I haven't made a close comparison, though.
Regardless, there could be more, and I want to get a complete set of Fujita's presentation and the ministers' responses, beginning to end. I'm thinking it ends with the speech of party president Ozawa, in the third video of the Dawasa1357 set. I'm thinking it begins with the first video of the set at 9/11 Blogger, where Fujita refers to prior questions.
I think, but am not sure, he was referring to these questions of 11/28/2007:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/13340#comment-174198
Ideally, I would like a Japanese transcript, which is easier and more accurate to translate.
Actually, ideally, a professional translator would do this, and someone would make subtitled videos. But I'm willing and able to help translate if there is a group forming.
I would suggest contacting Mr. Fujita's office to see if a transcript is available, and if it has been translated. What about the U.S. Embassy? Might they have a translation?
I just found out Yukihisa Fujita is one of the five Directors of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defense of the House of Councillors (the upper body of Japan's legislature). (Link to Committee)
This committee has 21 members. The Chairman of the committee and the four other Directors are also members of Fujita's party (DPJ).
I'm hopeful this will result in Fujita's concerns about 9/11 being taken seriously.
The DPJ is the opposition party to current Prime Minister Fukuda. The DPJ has a majority in the House of Councillors, but are in the minority of the House of Representatives (the lower body of the legislature).
Fujita was elected to the House of Councillors in 2007 and has five more years to serve in his 6-year term.
This committee has 21 members. The Chairman of the committee and the four other Directors are also members of Fujita's party (DPJ).
I'm hopeful this will result in Fujita's concerns about 9/11 being taken seriously.
The DPJ is the opposition party to current Prime Minister Fukuda. The DPJ has a majority in the House of Councillors, but are in the minority of the House of Representatives (the lower body of the legislature).
Fujita was elected to the House of Councillors in 2007 and has five more years to serve in his 6-year term.
There are some rough summary translations by Dwightvw in comments here:
http://911blogger-bans-truth.com/node/13340
Also some discussion and links about the Democratic Party of Japan. They are the largest opposition party.
Unfortunately, the videos used at 9/11 Blogger came from a YouTube post with lots of baggage. Whether disinfo or not, none of it should be attached to videos about what was said in the Japanese legislature. I like the videos used by Alan Miller here. Not only are they baggage-free, they appear to be directly from NHK live.
However, there seems to be content that each set has that the other doesn't. I would like to get a complete set, to be posted with out links to websites talking about Ron Paul, Illuminati, etc. I have to wonder if those videos were intentionally dipped in sh*t, given how significant this story is.
{Sorry, I just realized I already said some of this in an earlier comment.)
http://911blogger-bans-truth.com/node/13340
Also some discussion and links about the Democratic Party of Japan. They are the largest opposition party.
Unfortunately, the videos used at 9/11 Blogger came from a YouTube post with lots of baggage. Whether disinfo or not, none of it should be attached to videos about what was said in the Japanese legislature. I like the videos used by Alan Miller here. Not only are they baggage-free, they appear to be directly from NHK live.
However, there seems to be content that each set has that the other doesn't. I would like to get a complete set, to be posted with out links to websites talking about Ron Paul, Illuminati, etc. I have to wonder if those videos were intentionally dipped in sh*t, given how significant this story is.
{Sorry, I just realized I already said some of this in an earlier comment.)
Added transcript link to OP and pinned.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=10563
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=10563
QUOTE (Alan Miller @ Jan 14 2008, 07:42 AM)
I just found out Yukihisa Fujita is one of the five Directors of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defense of the House of Councillors (the upper body of Japan's legislature). (Link to Committee)
This committee has 21 members. The Chairman of the committee and the four other Directors are also members of Fujita's party (DPJ).
I'm hopeful this will result in Fujita's concerns about 9/11 being taken seriously...
This committee has 21 members. The Chairman of the committee and the four other Directors are also members of Fujita's party (DPJ).
I'm hopeful this will result in Fujita's concerns about 9/11 being taken seriously...
F#$king A !!!
Japan has its down sides, but I'm likin' this country alot right now.
We are of course all asking laimstream media why this is not covered right?
January 11, 2008 from Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs site:
http://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/pm/fukuda/state0801.html
NOTE the use of quotes on the words "fight against terror" was not done by me. i dont know if thats something lost in translation or if they truly intended to use quotes (to imply something).
some relevant background info from August 7th 2007:
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:IIqKS...e%3D1+The+Shin-
Ryokufukai+and+The+Nippon+afghanistan&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us
a broad overview of of japan's politics:
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:qPk6A...clnk&cd=1&gl=us
an OFFICIAL overview of japan's counter terrorism measures - from their ministry of foreign affairs (lots of LINKS):
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/terrorism/index.html
one link worthy of mention from the above page, describes conclusions reached in 2007 about terrorism and the direction to head in:
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/asem/.../terro0705.html
when to tune in next - to see if Fujita's 9/11 revelations have had any measurable impact:
http://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/pm/fukuda/state0801.html
QUOTE
Statement by Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda
On Enactment of the Replenishment Support Special Measures Law
As of today, the Replenishment Support Special Measures Law was enacted.
The Government of Japan intends to formulate the implementation plan in the middle of next week and set sail Maritime Self-Defense Force vessels for the Indian Ocean by the end of January so as to resume the refueling activities at the earliest possible date.
Japan's prosperity can only be enjoyed in a peaceful and stable international community. It needs to actively cooperate with the "fight against terror" on its own judgment so as to contribute to the international community. The refueling activities are a demonstration of Japan's efforts to do the utmost within its capability. It is truly significant that Japan can now rejoin the "fight against terror".
It is important to implement humanitarian and reconstruction assistance as well as security and counter-terrorism measures so as to eradicate terrorism. The Government of Japan will continue to actively implement humanitarian and reconstruction assistance and contribute to the nation-building of Afghanistan in close coordination with the international community.
I hope to gain further understanding and support of the Japanese people for these efforts of the Government of Japan.
On Enactment of the Replenishment Support Special Measures Law
As of today, the Replenishment Support Special Measures Law was enacted.
The Government of Japan intends to formulate the implementation plan in the middle of next week and set sail Maritime Self-Defense Force vessels for the Indian Ocean by the end of January so as to resume the refueling activities at the earliest possible date.
Japan's prosperity can only be enjoyed in a peaceful and stable international community. It needs to actively cooperate with the "fight against terror" on its own judgment so as to contribute to the international community. The refueling activities are a demonstration of Japan's efforts to do the utmost within its capability. It is truly significant that Japan can now rejoin the "fight against terror".
It is important to implement humanitarian and reconstruction assistance as well as security and counter-terrorism measures so as to eradicate terrorism. The Government of Japan will continue to actively implement humanitarian and reconstruction assistance and contribute to the nation-building of Afghanistan in close coordination with the international community.
I hope to gain further understanding and support of the Japanese people for these efforts of the Government of Japan.
NOTE the use of quotes on the words "fight against terror" was not done by me. i dont know if thats something lost in translation or if they truly intended to use quotes (to imply something).
some relevant background info from August 7th 2007:
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:IIqKS...e%3D1+The+Shin-
Ryokufukai+and+The+Nippon+afghanistan&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us
QUOTE
Democratic Party of Japan (same party as Fujita Yukihisa) President Ichiro Ozawa said Tuesday his party will consider submitting a bill aimed at canceling the dispatch of Air Self-Defense Force troops to help in Iraq's reconstruction during an extraordinary Diet session in the fall.
Ozawa also reiterated at a press conference his opposition to extending the antiterrorism law, set to expire Nov. 1, which allows Maritime Self-Defense Force vessels to provide refueling support for the U.S.-led multinational force in the Indian Ocean.
Speaking on the antiterrorism law, Ozawa said, "In the war in Afghanistan, U.S. President (George W.) Bush started it with no concern from the United Nations and international society, saying that it's a war of self-defense for the United States."
His remarks showed that he thinks providing such support itself a problem, and hinted that the DPJ, which has become the largest party in the House of Councillors, may not only oppose extending the antiterrorism law, but also even refuse to hold discussions with the ruling bloc on an extension.
On the bill to cancel ASDF airlift operations for Iraq, Ozawa said, "It will be one option."
Ozawa held a press conference for the first time since the DPJ-led opposition camp gained a majority in the upper house in the election on July 29, inflicting a heavy defeat on Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's ruling coalition. The DPJ topped Abe's LDP to become the largest party in the upper house.
Ozawa also showed willingness to form a joint parliamentary group in the upper chamber with members from the DPJ, two other minor opposition parties -- the People's New Party and New Party Nippon -- and independents.
"If we can secure a certain amount of seats with one political group, that'll be a good thing," he said.
Ozawa also reiterated at a press conference his opposition to extending the antiterrorism law, set to expire Nov. 1, which allows Maritime Self-Defense Force vessels to provide refueling support for the U.S.-led multinational force in the Indian Ocean.
Speaking on the antiterrorism law, Ozawa said, "In the war in Afghanistan, U.S. President (George W.) Bush started it with no concern from the United Nations and international society, saying that it's a war of self-defense for the United States."
His remarks showed that he thinks providing such support itself a problem, and hinted that the DPJ, which has become the largest party in the House of Councillors, may not only oppose extending the antiterrorism law, but also even refuse to hold discussions with the ruling bloc on an extension.
On the bill to cancel ASDF airlift operations for Iraq, Ozawa said, "It will be one option."
Ozawa held a press conference for the first time since the DPJ-led opposition camp gained a majority in the upper house in the election on July 29, inflicting a heavy defeat on Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's ruling coalition. The DPJ topped Abe's LDP to become the largest party in the upper house.
Ozawa also showed willingness to form a joint parliamentary group in the upper chamber with members from the DPJ, two other minor opposition parties -- the People's New Party and New Party Nippon -- and independents.
"If we can secure a certain amount of seats with one political group, that'll be a good thing," he said.
a broad overview of of japan's politics:
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:qPk6A...clnk&cd=1&gl=us
QUOTE
Recent Political Developments (november 2007)
Recent developments in politics include the landslide victory of the DPJ in the July 2007 Upper House election, the subsequent resignation of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and inauguration of Yasuo Fukuda as Japan’s 92nd Prime Minister, the coming into force of the privatisation of Japan Post (Japan’s largest financial institution), the lapsing of the Anti-Terrorism Special Measures Law which allows Japanese support of coalition operations in Afghanistan (and the subsequent cessation on 1 November of Japan’s Maritime Self-Defence forces refuelling operations in the Indian Ocean), a series of “money politics” allegations involving senior politicians and government bureaucrats, debate over amendment of the post-war Japanese Constitution, and the government’s misplacing of millions of pension account records.
The DPJ’s Upper House election win has had significant consequences for national politics since the ruling coalition has now lost its control of the Upper House – a situation which may continue until 2010. This means that legislation passed in the Lower House by the ruling coalition is no longer readily passed by the Upper House. This has resulted in a shift in the government’s policy making process that formerly was solely an intra-ruling coalition process to seek to include negotiation with the Opposition.
Other themes that appear regularly in Japan’s political agenda include the management of pension funding commitments, protection of the environment, freedom of information, immigration policy, energy security and industrial pollution, local autonomy and taxation powers, education, the economic distribution of wealth, government spending priorities and regional economic stimulation, limits to military spending, use of symbols of Japanese nationhood such as the Japanese flag and anthem, deregulation of highly-regulated industries, tax reform including raising the consumption tax, protectionism and agriculture, the internationalisation of Japanese industry, education, foreign relations, territorial disputes, and commitments to and expectations of the United Nations, including Japan’s quest for permanent membership of the UN Security Council.
Recent developments in politics include the landslide victory of the DPJ in the July 2007 Upper House election, the subsequent resignation of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and inauguration of Yasuo Fukuda as Japan’s 92nd Prime Minister, the coming into force of the privatisation of Japan Post (Japan’s largest financial institution), the lapsing of the Anti-Terrorism Special Measures Law which allows Japanese support of coalition operations in Afghanistan (and the subsequent cessation on 1 November of Japan’s Maritime Self-Defence forces refuelling operations in the Indian Ocean), a series of “money politics” allegations involving senior politicians and government bureaucrats, debate over amendment of the post-war Japanese Constitution, and the government’s misplacing of millions of pension account records.
The DPJ’s Upper House election win has had significant consequences for national politics since the ruling coalition has now lost its control of the Upper House – a situation which may continue until 2010. This means that legislation passed in the Lower House by the ruling coalition is no longer readily passed by the Upper House. This has resulted in a shift in the government’s policy making process that formerly was solely an intra-ruling coalition process to seek to include negotiation with the Opposition.
Other themes that appear regularly in Japan’s political agenda include the management of pension funding commitments, protection of the environment, freedom of information, immigration policy, energy security and industrial pollution, local autonomy and taxation powers, education, the economic distribution of wealth, government spending priorities and regional economic stimulation, limits to military spending, use of symbols of Japanese nationhood such as the Japanese flag and anthem, deregulation of highly-regulated industries, tax reform including raising the consumption tax, protectionism and agriculture, the internationalisation of Japanese industry, education, foreign relations, territorial disputes, and commitments to and expectations of the United Nations, including Japan’s quest for permanent membership of the UN Security Council.
an OFFICIAL overview of japan's counter terrorism measures - from their ministry of foreign affairs (lots of LINKS):
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/terrorism/index.html
one link worthy of mention from the above page, describes conclusions reached in 2007 about terrorism and the direction to head in:
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/asem/.../terro0705.html
QUOTE
Chair's Summary of the Fifth ASEM Conference on Counter-Terrorism
Tokyo, JAPAN
15-16th May, 2007
-The conference recognized terrorism as a threat to all citizens and nations as well as to international peace and security in Asia, Europe and beyond. It strongly condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, committed by whomever, wherever and for whatever purposes, irrespective of background and motivation.
-The conference, recalling the commitments made by leaders at the ASEM Summit in September 2006 to the fight against terrorism, underlined the importance of a comprehensive approach from the international community to fight terrorism, carried out in accordance with international law, in particular the UN Charter, respecting human rights, and international humanitarian law. Equally, the conference emphasized the rejection of any attempts to associate terrorism with any religion, race, nationality, or ethnic group.
-The conference shared recent terrorism threat assessments and recognized that, while the international effort to combat terrorism has achieved significant progress, terrorism remains a serious threat to international peace and security. The conference recognized the need to further enhance counter-terrorism cooperation including information sharing, tightening immigration/border control, and combating terrorist financing, terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction, and terrorist use of media, particularly the internet.
-The conference recognized the importance of strengthening counter terrorism capability of each ASEM partner. The conference also underlined the need for a concerted effort by the international community to counter terrorism which includes political, economic, diplomatic, legal and other means. In this context, the conference called for further enhancement of intra- and interregional cooperation. The participants shared information on the assistance needs and assistance schemes of ASEM partners, regional counter-terrorism centers and the United Nations with a view to strengthening ties between Asia and Europe in order to fulfill the potential of their assistance cooperation.
-The conference reiterated ASEM's firm supports for the leading role of the United Nations in the fight against terrorism. It welcomed the adoption of the General Assembly Resolution on the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in September 2006 and reaffirmed the ASEM partners' commitment to cooperate in order to ensure their full implementation of the Strategy. In this context, the conference emphasized the importance of the role of the UNCTC/CTED, Al Qaeda/Taliban Sanctions Committee and the UNODC. The conference called for states to become parties to and fully implement all UN Conventions and Protocols on international terrorism as well as relevant UN Resolutions. In this context, the conference noted that the UNODC can play a complementary role of providing assistance to countries for becoming parties to and implementing the universal counter-terrorism instruments. The conference urged for the early conclusion of the negotiations on the draft Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism.
-The conference welcomed the adoption of the ASEAN Counter Terrorism Convention in January 2007 as a regional tool reinforcing the international effort to strengthen the counter terrorism legal framework.
Tokyo, JAPAN
15-16th May, 2007
-The conference recognized terrorism as a threat to all citizens and nations as well as to international peace and security in Asia, Europe and beyond. It strongly condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, committed by whomever, wherever and for whatever purposes, irrespective of background and motivation.
-The conference, recalling the commitments made by leaders at the ASEM Summit in September 2006 to the fight against terrorism, underlined the importance of a comprehensive approach from the international community to fight terrorism, carried out in accordance with international law, in particular the UN Charter, respecting human rights, and international humanitarian law. Equally, the conference emphasized the rejection of any attempts to associate terrorism with any religion, race, nationality, or ethnic group.
-The conference shared recent terrorism threat assessments and recognized that, while the international effort to combat terrorism has achieved significant progress, terrorism remains a serious threat to international peace and security. The conference recognized the need to further enhance counter-terrorism cooperation including information sharing, tightening immigration/border control, and combating terrorist financing, terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction, and terrorist use of media, particularly the internet.
-The conference recognized the importance of strengthening counter terrorism capability of each ASEM partner. The conference also underlined the need for a concerted effort by the international community to counter terrorism which includes political, economic, diplomatic, legal and other means. In this context, the conference called for further enhancement of intra- and interregional cooperation. The participants shared information on the assistance needs and assistance schemes of ASEM partners, regional counter-terrorism centers and the United Nations with a view to strengthening ties between Asia and Europe in order to fulfill the potential of their assistance cooperation.
-The conference reiterated ASEM's firm supports for the leading role of the United Nations in the fight against terrorism. It welcomed the adoption of the General Assembly Resolution on the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in September 2006 and reaffirmed the ASEM partners' commitment to cooperate in order to ensure their full implementation of the Strategy. In this context, the conference emphasized the importance of the role of the UNCTC/CTED, Al Qaeda/Taliban Sanctions Committee and the UNODC. The conference called for states to become parties to and fully implement all UN Conventions and Protocols on international terrorism as well as relevant UN Resolutions. In this context, the conference noted that the UNODC can play a complementary role of providing assistance to countries for becoming parties to and implementing the universal counter-terrorism instruments. The conference urged for the early conclusion of the negotiations on the draft Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism.
-The conference welcomed the adoption of the ASEAN Counter Terrorism Convention in January 2007 as a regional tool reinforcing the international effort to strengthen the counter terrorism legal framework.
when to tune in next - to see if Fujita's 9/11 revelations have had any measurable impact:
QUOTE
The conference looked forward to the next ASEM Conference on Counter-Terrorism to be hosted by Spain in 2008.The results of this conference will be presented at the Eighth ASEM Foreign Ministers' Meeting on 29-30 May 2007 in Hamburg, Germany.
Videos with English Subtitles added to OP.
Thanks guys! Great Job!
The last video returns the message that it has been removed. Anyone know where I can watch the subtitled version of part 5?
#5 above works for me. Try it again, maturin42.
added Parts 6, 7, 8 to OP.
I would like to thank you Alan, for letting me observe the Japanese government house in action. Such impeccable manners they have. They practice showing respect for each other so much. My year in Vietnam made me admire the oriental culture.
Anyway, if I get a dog anytime, I'm going to name him Fujita.
That guy has courage. It will be fascinating if he brings out the truth. The Rising Sun.
Anyway, if I get a dog anytime, I'm going to name him Fujita.
That guy has courage. It will be fascinating if he brings out the truth. The Rising Sun.
QUOTE (Daniels @ Jan 13 2008, 04:43 AM)
Those crims must be squirming in their seats with this news.
Are they really?
Sometimes, when I am frustrated about the absolute lack of impact of such a powerful presentation on the public opinion, I am in doubt whether these scums will ever face justice.
I mean, Fujita is a high representative of the Japanese gouvernment and he spoke to the House of Councilors and not to a handful of 'conspiracy theorists' at a 9/11 conference.
f*ck lamestream media.
Who needs them, when other Japanese (or German or French or whatever) gouvernment representatives start to repeat Fujita's questions?
But they don't.
These cowards bury their heads in the sand and STFU.
And the perps in the USA and Israel continue to enjoy and cement their power.
Someone please post something reconstructive. OF?
Words of wisdom, Daniels.
Not very consoling though...
Not very consoling though...
Mr.Fujita participated in a 9/11 workshop in the European Parliament on Feb28th
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=10886
There's a video from the event in this post.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=10886
QUOTE
Question: 'Mr Fujita, how did you become involved?'
Fujita: ‘I work for several Japanese NGO’s and one of those people showed me some videos and books. At first I couldn’t believe it. So I saw Loose Change and read Dr Griffin’s books. And last year a good friend of mine who has a very high position at the German national bank told me about the put options that were placed on American Airlines and United Airlines. I believed him. And reading Dr Griffin’s book, looking at his reputation, I have every reason to believe him. That’s when I realised that every truth finding effort has to be continued. So I gave a presentation in the Japanese parliament (which is extensively covered on YouTube – ed. note). But I feel the truthers find their information mostly by internet. The truth should not only go by internet. It should now go political! Networking is very important. We must all work together.’
Fujita: ‘I work for several Japanese NGO’s and one of those people showed me some videos and books. At first I couldn’t believe it. So I saw Loose Change and read Dr Griffin’s books. And last year a good friend of mine who has a very high position at the German national bank told me about the put options that were placed on American Airlines and United Airlines. I believed him. And reading Dr Griffin’s book, looking at his reputation, I have every reason to believe him. That’s when I realised that every truth finding effort has to be continued. So I gave a presentation in the Japanese parliament (which is extensively covered on YouTube – ed. note). But I feel the truthers find their information mostly by internet. The truth should not only go by internet. It should now go political! Networking is very important. We must all work together.’
There's a video from the event in this post.
second hour of the AJ Sunday show, on now.
http://www.infowars.com/
Zap edited to add
On the Sunday Edition this week, Alex interviews Yukihisa Fujita, member of the Japanese Diet, who questions the official 9/11 version and the "war on terror."
Thanks zap, I was in a bit of hurry,
Always post a description/comment with a link.
(they can vanish, like a drop into the ocean)
made mental note.
http://www.infowars.com/
Zap edited to add
On the Sunday Edition this week, Alex interviews Yukihisa Fujita, member of the Japanese Diet, who questions the official 9/11 version and the "war on terror."
Thanks zap, I was in a bit of hurry,
Always post a description/comment with a link.
(they can vanish, like a drop into the ocean)
made mental note.
Hey Russ Wittenberg! You made it to the japanese parliament:
Fujita comes up with Pilts For Truth, April 24th:
Is there still someone left here who doubts that the pilots
efforts to spread the truth is worth it?
still waiting for the Austrian parliament to mention: Carl
Fujita comes up with Pilts For Truth, April 24th:
Is there still someone left here who doubts that the pilots
efforts to spread the truth is worth it?
still waiting for the Austrian parliament to mention: Carl
Outstanding.
Thanks very much Carl. I may have to look for more. Is this live now, or translated from the previous hearings?
just English except for Babylon: UT
Thanks very much Carl. I may have to look for more. Is this live now, or translated from the previous hearings?
just English except for Babylon: UT
QUOTE (UnderTow @ May 1 2008, 02:28 PM) 
Outstanding.
Thanks very much Carl. I may have to look for more. Is this live now, or translated from the previous hearings?
just English except for Babylon: UT
Thanks very much Carl. I may have to look for more. Is this live now, or translated from the previous hearings?
just English except for Babylon: UT
HI UT! I found it on Blogger:
911blogger.com / Yukihisa Fujita back for another round - April 24th, 2008
There is also another video from the same day, where Fujita questioned the vaporization of the AA77 engines
in the blog entry. And this note was added yesterday:
QUOTE
(This blog indicates it may have been April 23rd:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...p;videoid=329... )
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...p;videoid=329... )
so frikkin proud of you all: Carl
Err... didn't send Sanders the P4T press releases to Fujito after he
first come out with his doubts?
thinks the above video could be a direct response to Sandy's mail: Carl
first come out with his doubts?
thinks the above video could be a direct response to Sandy's mail: Carl
This is great. I wasn't sure at first if we would even hear about Mr Fujita again. You know how it goes.
Mr Fujita definatley has some balls.
Mr Fujita definatley has some balls.
QUOTE (Carl Bank @ May 5 2008, 04:41 AM)
Err... didn't send Sanders the P4T press releases to Fujito after he
first come out with his doubts?
thinks the above video could be a direct response to Sandy's mail: Carl
first come out with his doubts?
thinks the above video could be a direct response to Sandy's mail: Carl
I did try to inform the Fujita camp of our research here, via his blog. I tried to explain the FDR research in Japanese - but I have no idea whether or not it did any good, I suspect that, since Councillor Fujita hasn't specifically mentioned the AA77 black box research, he still isn't fully aware of P4T. It's only a matter of time though
QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Apr 30 2008, 11:09 PM)
Hey Russ Wittenberg! You made it to the japanese parliament:
Is there still someone left here who doubts that the pilots
efforts to spread the truth is worth it?
still waiting for the Austrian parliament to mention: Carl
Is there still someone left here who doubts that the pilots
efforts to spread the truth is worth it?
still waiting for the Austrian parliament to mention: Carl
Don't count on the Austrian Parliament (let alone any other Parliament in the former free nations of today's European Protectorate).
Our chickenshit-MP's have just obediently ratified the Treaty of Lisboa, trembling with fear after "Al Quaeda - terrorists" have hijacked 2 Austrian tourists in the Algerian desert.
They know, what Al Quaeda is and they also know, that the European Soccer Championship in June is in serious danger of being hit by an 'Islamic' terror attack, if they only think of questioning the new European "constitution" like thousands of protesters in manifold rallies in Vienna.
Mr. Fujita, you are a hero!!!
Right On Fujita!!
QUOTE (Alan Miller @ Jan 12 2008, 06:58 PM)
On January 11th 2008, Fujita Yukihisa made a 30 minute presentation at the House of Councillors (equivalent to the U.S. Senate). He directly questioned the official version of 9/11 in a session with Japanese Prime Minister Fukuda Yasuo and members of his Cabinet.
Fujita is a member of the opposition party, Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). He was elected to the House of Councillors in 2007. He is a former Member of the House of Representative and Former Vice Director General of the International Department of the Democratic Party of Japan.
Fujita emphasized that there was never an official police investigation into the deaths of the 24 Japanese citizens who were killed on 9/11.
He stated that many in the US doubt the official version of 9/11 and numerous individuals have collected evidence that contradicts the government's version, which can be seen on many websites.
During his speech, an aide showed several larges photos of:
- the Pentagon entry and exit hole and a scale overlay of a 757
- the flight path towards the Pentagon
- the WTC Twin Towers exploding
- the WTC 7 collapse
- the early announcment of the collapse of WTC 7 by the BBC and CBS
He demanded further investigation of 9/11.
This issue is being raised now as part of the discussion of whether Japan should increase its military and financial support of the "War on Terror"
Video of his presentation can be seen in three parts at Video of Speech Part 1, Part 2, Part 3
edit by rb:
English transcript/translation of above videos now available here http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=10563
edit #2 by rb: Added Videos with English Subtitles (Special thanks to the person who emailed them to us, not sure if he wants his name mentioned)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Fujita is a member of the opposition party, Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). He was elected to the House of Councillors in 2007. He is a former Member of the House of Representative and Former Vice Director General of the International Department of the Democratic Party of Japan.
Fujita emphasized that there was never an official police investigation into the deaths of the 24 Japanese citizens who were killed on 9/11.
He stated that many in the US doubt the official version of 9/11 and numerous individuals have collected evidence that contradicts the government's version, which can be seen on many websites.
During his speech, an aide showed several larges photos of:
- the Pentagon entry and exit hole and a scale overlay of a 757
- the flight path towards the Pentagon
- the WTC Twin Towers exploding
- the WTC 7 collapse
- the early announcment of the collapse of WTC 7 by the BBC and CBS
He demanded further investigation of 9/11.
This issue is being raised now as part of the discussion of whether Japan should increase its military and financial support of the "War on Terror"
Video of his presentation can be seen in three parts at Video of Speech Part 1, Part 2, Part 3
edit by rb:
English transcript/translation of above videos now available here http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=10563
edit #2 by rb: Added Videos with English Subtitles (Special thanks to the person who emailed them to us, not sure if he wants his name mentioned)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Why are none of these links working except for the first one?
QUOTE (Lanneya-austin @ May 3 2008, 11:21 AM)
Why are none of these links working except for the first one?
Flicks are running fine with me. Try the direct links:
1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH1UA3ijXug
2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02esZQr-u74
3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t-dZiNE9NI
4 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_WIZ1PDt4
5 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaEGhiHhZ1Y
6 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A43IxJcFJEw
7 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hUexQWI948
8 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKtv36Sh3iQ
and welcome to the forum!
Carl
I just found the following interview with Mr. Fujita on a German website, "Hintergrund.de".
The original is in German; so I translated the whole thing into English.
If anyone notices any mistakes in that translation, please let me know.
Original:
http://hintergrund.de/index.php?option=com...&Itemid=137
Translation:
[quote]
Japans biggest opposition-party doubts the official version of 9/11
Interview with Yukihisa Fujita on June 18 2008:
Yukihisa Fujita, Deputy of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) travels at present across Europe. His goal is to build an international network of leading politicians and recognised personalities who will work towards a renewed investigation regarding the terror-attacks of September 11 2001. In his role as chairman of a parliamentary commitee regarding foreign policy issues, he already questioned the Japanese prime minister and several ministers on January 10 of this year in connection with the inconsistencies within the official interpretation of 9/11. According to his own statements, Fujita was supported in this request by his party, the DPJ - the most important opposition-party in Japan.
The parliamentarian doubts regarding the official version of 9/11 by several Japanese politicians drew attention internationally.
Fujitas calls for a new and independent investigation of the tragedy of six years ago have brought him on June 17 and 18 to Berlin.
'Hintergrund' questioned the politician about his request before he travelled on to Rome.
Hintergrund:
Mr. Yukihisa Fujita, you would like to speak with European politicians to discuss the inconsistencies and gaps in the official interpretation of September 11.
How did you discover this topic, and why is it important ?
Fujita:
Well- It's already a few years in the past- when I spoke with (members of) a Japanese Citizens initiative, working for the civilian victims of the war in Afghanistan. They called the civilians who had died in Afghanistan "Victims of 9/11". And I asked them why they would call the civilian casualties of that war Victims of 9/11.
They told me that this war was a direct result of 9/11, and also that far more people had died in Afghanistan then in New York.
This showed me for the first time that normal Japanese citizens felt were the true victims of 9/11 could in the main be found. This was the first moment I began to be more interested in the background of 9/11.
Hintergrund:
And you began to investigate ?
Fujita:
First there was another moment which awakened my doubts. Namely when a lecturer in my electoral district told me that the Americans can win wars through their superior technology, and that they can kill the Taliban. But he was surprised that the price of a life lost in Afghanistan seemed much lower than the price of a life lost in New York. And that seemed unjust.
These two experiences led me to asking if it was right to conduct the war in Afghanistan as an answer to 9/11.
Hintergrund:
So you first questioned the meaning of the war in Afghanistan, but not yet the official version of 9/11 ?
Fujita:
Some time passed, and it so happened that I had a chance to watch several critical documentaries regarding 9/11. The films were "911 In Plane Site", "Loose Change" aso.
But at that point those films could not yet convince me that 9/11 could have happened in the way in which it was depicted there. I told myself that it could not have happened like that. It simply seemed too extreme.
Hintergrund:
What brought you to reconsider this possibility after dismissing it at first ?
Fujita:
Last year I was confronted by new facts, which I simply could no longer ignore.
For example the fact that one section of the World Trade Center complex, WTC7- a 47-storey-towerblock- had collapsed late afternoon on September 11, even though it had not been hit by any aircraft.
Hintergrund:
World Trade Center 7 stood about 100m away from the North-tower of the two Twin-towers and had roughly half their height. The building had suffered slight damage through the collapsing twin-towers on one side. At 17:20 in late afternoon it suddenly collapsed.
The building did not tilt sideways or collapse partially, but collapsed simultaneously and symetrically into its own footprint. The collapse happened at the speed of free fall, namely 6.5 seconds.
The structural substance was almost completely pulverized.
Fujita:
The collapse of WTC 7 is one of those facts which can simply not be ignored. After I looked at WTC 7, I watched several documentaries which dealt with the supposed impact of an aircraft at the Pentagon again.
Then I heard of the Put-options...
Hintergrund:
...A financial product by which the buyer can bet on the falling quotations of a stock-corporation as well as other values.
Fujita:
...Which had been placed in unusually high numbers with the very companies which suffered falling quotations due to the catastrophy. This fact was verified by the then head of the Deutsche Bundesbank.
I thought back then that all those are facts which no longer fit into the official version, no matter how much one tries.
Hintergrund:
And this reinforced your intention to question the Prime minister of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in respect to the contradictions of 9/11 ?
Fujita:
The deciding moment came with a speech held in parliament by a well-known Japanese politician. He argued that Japan had to support the Americans in their wars in Afghanistan and Iraq for the simple reason that Japanese citizens had also died on September 11.
When I heard that, I thought that if 9/11 is still being used to justify the Japanese participation in these wars, then the Japanese public must have a right to also hear about these new facts. So I spoke with several members of the Government and discovered that here and there other politicians had doubts about the doubtful impact of an aircraft at the Pentagon-site or the supposed crash of the plane in Pensylvania as well.
And even the minister for defense mentioned the possibility of an involvement of the US-Government in the events of September 11.
All this contributed to my decision to direct a series of questions at the Prime Minister and other Ministers of the Government, on January 10 2008.
For example, I asked if the deaths of Japanese citizens on September 11 2001 had ever been investigated independently by the Japanese Government, or if they had simply relied on the statements given by the US-Government.
Hintergrund:
You used your position as chairman of comitee on defense- and foreign policy. Your presentation lasted half an hour. And you used that time to present the assembled parliamentarians with a selection of visual- and text-material. What were the reactions ?
Were you not subjected to hostility ?
Fujita:
To my surprise there was no hostility from the ranks of the Government party at all. They were very quiet. They must have felt that I studied the facts regarding 9/11 at length and in depth. And that therefore they were in no position to counter me with viable arguments.
In the following days, there were two articles which tried to present me in a negative light or ridicule me. But nobody tried to criticize me in public for what I did.
In the days after, I discovered that many members of my party had also issues with the official version of 9/11.
But on the whole, they still had not yet enough information to challenge the Government with open questions. After my presentation at the Japanese parliament, many of these politicians came to me and told me that they had already heard of this or that inconsistency, or even that they had come across information themselves.
Especially over the last few months, many important politicians of my own party have assured me of their support for what I'm doing.
This has then resulted in two further presentations about the discrepancies of 9/11 before party-members. And by now I'm also in contact with several politicians from within the LDP who support me in my request for a new international investigation.
Hintergrund:
At the moment you are travelling through Europe trying to build contacts to European politicians. What concrete goal will you be following in the next months ?
Fujita:
Over the last few months I have used many an opportunity to travel to Europe and to speak with politicians who have uttered doubts about the official story of 9/11.
I spoke to politicians from Britain, Italy and Germany and also met with politicians of the European parliament. And they were quite grateful to hear from politicians from other countries who work on the same issue as myself. After all the talks conducted by me I have the impression that many politicians are quite certain that the official version of 9/11 can not be true. But they feel isolated within their own parties or their own parliaments.
They decidedly need more support from other politicians.
Through international networking, we will also be able to better co-ordinate (our actions) and prevent potential attacks.
Hintergrund:
The psychological barrier to deal with this issue is quite high.
How do you deal with that ?
Fujita:
To make it easier for politicians from other countries to get organised themselves, we have prepared a petition which can be signed internationally by individual politicians.
Main focal point of this petition is the demand for a new and especially independant investigation regarding the events of September 11 2001.
And I believe that the request to begin impeachment-proceedings against President Bush which was presented by Deputy Dennis Kucinich to the US-Congress last week will be great encouragement for all those politicians who work towards a renewed investigation of 9/11.
I think it will now become easier and easier. For the individual politicians, who have been alone with their doubts up to now, will in the future communicate more with each other.
Hintergrund:
The argument is often used that those events are six years in the past and that since then new political problems have arisen.
Fujita:
But many of them are directly or indirectly connected to 9/11.
And because of that, I believe that a new investigation of 9/11 may prove to be the key to reaching a change in course in regard to the many political problems.
For 9/11 did not only justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to the USA.
The USA have also used this event to enforce a political line against other nations which otherwise could not have been followed.
I remind you in this regard of the Echelon-system, which is used for industrial espionage, for example.
Before September 11, there was resistance within the EU against the American practise to monitor European communications by way of this system, which was silenced for a while after September 11.
One of the most important challenges we are facing is to turn around the developement towards a world in which war is seen as a means to achieving political goals.
Tomorrow I will speak at a congress of the "European Democrats".
Hintergrund:
An alliance of parties within the European parliament which includes parties from Italy, the Czech republic, Portugal and Britain.
Fujita:
...The exact title is "Meeting of the alliance of Democrats". And I will present the proposal to turn world politics from a policy of war towards a policy of consolidation and developement.
Hintergrund:
And this can be reached through an increased awareness and questioning of the events of 9/11 ?
Fujita:
You see, 9/11 can be investigated worldwide and by anyone with access to texts, documentaries and images. Ultimately it's not impossible that the doubts about the official story of 9/11 will spread globally.
Such a global movement of sceptics could very well influence the presentation of the media.
And should this be possible, then it would also be possible to influence the foreign policy of the USA in this way.
A new investigation of 9/11 is a chance to support a peaceful and democratic United States against the United States of the Neocons.[/quote]
The original is in German; so I translated the whole thing into English.
If anyone notices any mistakes in that translation, please let me know.
Original:
http://hintergrund.de/index.php?option=com...&Itemid=137
Translation:
[quote]
Japans biggest opposition-party doubts the official version of 9/11
Interview with Yukihisa Fujita on June 18 2008:
Yukihisa Fujita, Deputy of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) travels at present across Europe. His goal is to build an international network of leading politicians and recognised personalities who will work towards a renewed investigation regarding the terror-attacks of September 11 2001. In his role as chairman of a parliamentary commitee regarding foreign policy issues, he already questioned the Japanese prime minister and several ministers on January 10 of this year in connection with the inconsistencies within the official interpretation of 9/11. According to his own statements, Fujita was supported in this request by his party, the DPJ - the most important opposition-party in Japan.
The parliamentarian doubts regarding the official version of 9/11 by several Japanese politicians drew attention internationally.
Fujitas calls for a new and independent investigation of the tragedy of six years ago have brought him on June 17 and 18 to Berlin.
'Hintergrund' questioned the politician about his request before he travelled on to Rome.
Hintergrund:
Mr. Yukihisa Fujita, you would like to speak with European politicians to discuss the inconsistencies and gaps in the official interpretation of September 11.
How did you discover this topic, and why is it important ?
Fujita:
Well- It's already a few years in the past- when I spoke with (members of) a Japanese Citizens initiative, working for the civilian victims of the war in Afghanistan. They called the civilians who had died in Afghanistan "Victims of 9/11". And I asked them why they would call the civilian casualties of that war Victims of 9/11.
They told me that this war was a direct result of 9/11, and also that far more people had died in Afghanistan then in New York.
This showed me for the first time that normal Japanese citizens felt were the true victims of 9/11 could in the main be found. This was the first moment I began to be more interested in the background of 9/11.
Hintergrund:
And you began to investigate ?
Fujita:
First there was another moment which awakened my doubts. Namely when a lecturer in my electoral district told me that the Americans can win wars through their superior technology, and that they can kill the Taliban. But he was surprised that the price of a life lost in Afghanistan seemed much lower than the price of a life lost in New York. And that seemed unjust.
These two experiences led me to asking if it was right to conduct the war in Afghanistan as an answer to 9/11.
Hintergrund:
So you first questioned the meaning of the war in Afghanistan, but not yet the official version of 9/11 ?
Fujita:
Some time passed, and it so happened that I had a chance to watch several critical documentaries regarding 9/11. The films were "911 In Plane Site", "Loose Change" aso.
But at that point those films could not yet convince me that 9/11 could have happened in the way in which it was depicted there. I told myself that it could not have happened like that. It simply seemed too extreme.
Hintergrund:
What brought you to reconsider this possibility after dismissing it at first ?
Fujita:
Last year I was confronted by new facts, which I simply could no longer ignore.
For example the fact that one section of the World Trade Center complex, WTC7- a 47-storey-towerblock- had collapsed late afternoon on September 11, even though it had not been hit by any aircraft.
Hintergrund:
World Trade Center 7 stood about 100m away from the North-tower of the two Twin-towers and had roughly half their height. The building had suffered slight damage through the collapsing twin-towers on one side. At 17:20 in late afternoon it suddenly collapsed.
The building did not tilt sideways or collapse partially, but collapsed simultaneously and symetrically into its own footprint. The collapse happened at the speed of free fall, namely 6.5 seconds.
The structural substance was almost completely pulverized.
Fujita:
The collapse of WTC 7 is one of those facts which can simply not be ignored. After I looked at WTC 7, I watched several documentaries which dealt with the supposed impact of an aircraft at the Pentagon again.
Then I heard of the Put-options...
Hintergrund:
...A financial product by which the buyer can bet on the falling quotations of a stock-corporation as well as other values.
Fujita:
...Which had been placed in unusually high numbers with the very companies which suffered falling quotations due to the catastrophy. This fact was verified by the then head of the Deutsche Bundesbank.
I thought back then that all those are facts which no longer fit into the official version, no matter how much one tries.
Hintergrund:
And this reinforced your intention to question the Prime minister of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in respect to the contradictions of 9/11 ?
Fujita:
The deciding moment came with a speech held in parliament by a well-known Japanese politician. He argued that Japan had to support the Americans in their wars in Afghanistan and Iraq for the simple reason that Japanese citizens had also died on September 11.
When I heard that, I thought that if 9/11 is still being used to justify the Japanese participation in these wars, then the Japanese public must have a right to also hear about these new facts. So I spoke with several members of the Government and discovered that here and there other politicians had doubts about the doubtful impact of an aircraft at the Pentagon-site or the supposed crash of the plane in Pensylvania as well.
And even the minister for defense mentioned the possibility of an involvement of the US-Government in the events of September 11.
All this contributed to my decision to direct a series of questions at the Prime Minister and other Ministers of the Government, on January 10 2008.
For example, I asked if the deaths of Japanese citizens on September 11 2001 had ever been investigated independently by the Japanese Government, or if they had simply relied on the statements given by the US-Government.
Hintergrund:
You used your position as chairman of comitee on defense- and foreign policy. Your presentation lasted half an hour. And you used that time to present the assembled parliamentarians with a selection of visual- and text-material. What were the reactions ?
Were you not subjected to hostility ?
Fujita:
To my surprise there was no hostility from the ranks of the Government party at all. They were very quiet. They must have felt that I studied the facts regarding 9/11 at length and in depth. And that therefore they were in no position to counter me with viable arguments.
In the following days, there were two articles which tried to present me in a negative light or ridicule me. But nobody tried to criticize me in public for what I did.
In the days after, I discovered that many members of my party had also issues with the official version of 9/11.
But on the whole, they still had not yet enough information to challenge the Government with open questions. After my presentation at the Japanese parliament, many of these politicians came to me and told me that they had already heard of this or that inconsistency, or even that they had come across information themselves.
Especially over the last few months, many important politicians of my own party have assured me of their support for what I'm doing.
This has then resulted in two further presentations about the discrepancies of 9/11 before party-members. And by now I'm also in contact with several politicians from within the LDP who support me in my request for a new international investigation.
Hintergrund:
At the moment you are travelling through Europe trying to build contacts to European politicians. What concrete goal will you be following in the next months ?
Fujita:
Over the last few months I have used many an opportunity to travel to Europe and to speak with politicians who have uttered doubts about the official story of 9/11.
I spoke to politicians from Britain, Italy and Germany and also met with politicians of the European parliament. And they were quite grateful to hear from politicians from other countries who work on the same issue as myself. After all the talks conducted by me I have the impression that many politicians are quite certain that the official version of 9/11 can not be true. But they feel isolated within their own parties or their own parliaments.
They decidedly need more support from other politicians.
Through international networking, we will also be able to better co-ordinate (our actions) and prevent potential attacks.
Hintergrund:
The psychological barrier to deal with this issue is quite high.
How do you deal with that ?
Fujita:
To make it easier for politicians from other countries to get organised themselves, we have prepared a petition which can be signed internationally by individual politicians.
Main focal point of this petition is the demand for a new and especially independant investigation regarding the events of September 11 2001.
And I believe that the request to begin impeachment-proceedings against President Bush which was presented by Deputy Dennis Kucinich to the US-Congress last week will be great encouragement for all those politicians who work towards a renewed investigation of 9/11.
I think it will now become easier and easier. For the individual politicians, who have been alone with their doubts up to now, will in the future communicate more with each other.
Hintergrund:
The argument is often used that those events are six years in the past and that since then new political problems have arisen.
Fujita:
But many of them are directly or indirectly connected to 9/11.
And because of that, I believe that a new investigation of 9/11 may prove to be the key to reaching a change in course in regard to the many political problems.
For 9/11 did not only justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to the USA.
The USA have also used this event to enforce a political line against other nations which otherwise could not have been followed.
I remind you in this regard of the Echelon-system, which is used for industrial espionage, for example.
Before September 11, there was resistance within the EU against the American practise to monitor European communications by way of this system, which was silenced for a while after September 11.
One of the most important challenges we are facing is to turn around the developement towards a world in which war is seen as a means to achieving political goals.
Tomorrow I will speak at a congress of the "European Democrats".
Hintergrund:
An alliance of parties within the European parliament which includes parties from Italy, the Czech republic, Portugal and Britain.
Fujita:
...The exact title is "Meeting of the alliance of Democrats". And I will present the proposal to turn world politics from a policy of war towards a policy of consolidation and developement.
Hintergrund:
And this can be reached through an increased awareness and questioning of the events of 9/11 ?
Fujita:
You see, 9/11 can be investigated worldwide and by anyone with access to texts, documentaries and images. Ultimately it's not impossible that the doubts about the official story of 9/11 will spread globally.
Such a global movement of sceptics could very well influence the presentation of the media.
And should this be possible, then it would also be possible to influence the foreign policy of the USA in this way.
A new investigation of 9/11 is a chance to support a peaceful and democratic United States against the United States of the Neocons.[/quote]
QUOTE (Carl Bank @ May 1 2008, 12:34 AM)
Flicks are running fine with me. Try the direct links:
1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH1UA3ijXug
2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02esZQr-u74
3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t-dZiNE9NI
4 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_WIZ1PDt4
5 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaEGhiHhZ1Y
6 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A43IxJcFJEw
7 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hUexQWI948
8 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKtv36Sh3iQ
and welcome to the forum!
Carl
1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH1UA3ijXug
2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02esZQr-u74
3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t-dZiNE9NI
4 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_WIZ1PDt4
5 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaEGhiHhZ1Y
6 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A43IxJcFJEw
7 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hUexQWI948
8 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKtv36Sh3iQ
and welcome to the forum!
Carl
HEY, LOOK none of these links are working. Helllllooooo. They have all been removed. Does anyone have new working links?
FYI,
All videos are showing "removed due to
terms of use violation"
Baztards
-Aero
..........................................
All videos are showing "removed due to
terms of use violation"
Baztards
-Aero
..........................................
QUOTE (chucksheen @ Jan 12 2008, 09:12 PM)
I would like to add that I encourage everyone to go to 'oathkeepers.org' and learn about them.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.