Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Wtc 7 Study By Simon Shack
Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum > Study > Research > Alternative Theories
ogrady
Check it out.

I like it, but I admit I'm a fan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgU57pHMEuw
rob balsamo
I can definitively say that No Plane hit WTC7, it wasnt even a hologam... wink.gif
KP50
QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jan 29 2009, 09:59 AM) *
I can definitively say that No Plane hit WTC7, it wasnt even a hologam... wink.gif

I'd be interested in seeing the rare footage, uninterrupted by SimonShack's pointless witterings. Those thick black lines, so mysterious.
saturnaspider
QUOTE (KP50 @ Jan 28 2009, 03:09 PM) *
I'd be interested in seeing the rare footage, uninterrupted by SimonShack's pointless witterings.


Simonshack's witterings aren't pointless, they are disinfo IMHO.

He's there to muddy the waters and has put out a great deal of nonsense mixed up with some genuine truths, this corrupting it and keeping us all flying around in circles.

I personally would advise staying well clear of anything simonshack. Half truths are more damaging than flat out lies as they are more seductive.

My 2 cents

Cheers, Saturna.
KP50
QUOTE (KP50 @ Jan 29 2009, 12:09 PM) *
I'd be interested in seeing the rare footage, uninterrupted by SimonShack's pointless witterings. Those thick black lines, so mysterious.

Leslie had posted it already in the WTC 7 section - thanks Leslie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0CU-teE0bQ
Sanders
QUOTE (saturnaspider @ Feb 1 2009, 09:43 PM) *
Half truths are more damaging than flat out lies as they are more seductive.


Agreed
dMz
I think this is actually one of the more important video clips regarding WTC7:

"Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9CXQY-bZn4...feature=related
saturnaspider
QUOTE (dMole @ Jan 29 2009, 03:13 AM) *
I think this is actually one of the more important video clips regarding WTC7:

"Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."


Yes, good vid, dmole.

Back to Shack:

The problem with Shack and his ilk, as I see it, is that he continues to propogate the spurious notion that the whole body of imagery related to 9/11 was the product somehow of a Future Combat System (FCS).

It is evident to me that fake planes were inserted into actual footage of WTC2 impacts, and of course there were other shenanigans going on, but to suggest, as Shack and his pack does, that things like the burning towers and the falling WTC7 building, were all faked also, is nothing more than slick disinfo, as far as I am concerned.

This all started with Fred/bsregistration and his claim that there was a missing building in the Hezarkhani clip. This claim was based on nothing more than a cynical exploitation of peoples' lack of understanding about perspective rules, and was royally debunked by Sanders and many others. Nevertheless the claims of total TVF continued to build, with suggestions of moving bridges and on and on.

THis seems to be a skilfully managed campaign designed to weaken what was a growing understanding about the No Planes at WTC evidence. It has been effective in this regard, unfortunately.

Simon's wilfull disregard of, and refusal to rectify, the many false claims contained within his "research", despite the fact that these falsehoods have been clearly pointed out to him, suggest to me that he is a major player in this particular disinfo game.
simonshack
Dear Saturnaspider,

Would you say the same things about my work now - 2 years on?

Have you put aside a little time to read the articles on my website?

http://www.septemberclues.info
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2013 Invision Power Services, Inc.