This is a bit of old news which started with a search for debate opponents on Air America Radio, but i never released the recording. I decided to release this recording today due to Meigs crawling out of his cave to "debunk" FEMA Camps with Glenn Beck. It appears Popular Mechanics would rather "debate" without an opponent as we have seen from so many who make excuses for the govt story.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/p4t/PM_RefuseDebate.mp3
Popular Mechanics still have yet to address NTSB provided and plotted Flight Data. When they do --if they do-- im sure it will be sans opponent with actual expertise on the matter.
Full Version: Popular Mechanics Refuse To Discuss 9/11 Flight Data
Sounds like you will have to wait until hell freezes over.
Was Meigs really out or hiding behind his receptionist?
I understand that Popular Mechanics is good for tree house plans, maybe!
Was Meigs really out or hiding behind his receptionist?
I understand that Popular Mechanics is good for tree house plans, maybe!
QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Apr 7 2009, 12:55 PM) 
Sounds like you will have to wait until hell freezes over.
Was Meigs really out or hiding behind his receptionist?
I understand that Popular Mechanics is good for tree house plans, maybe!
Was Meigs really out or hiding behind his receptionist?
I understand that Popular Mechanics is good for tree house plans, maybe!
And letting the populace know how we will take care of the UFO problem.
That's awesome. Lots of people will see that ... and want to know more.
That audio is great Rob, thanks for posting it.Meigs is a coward and an accomplice to the murders of 3,000 people for his involvement in the coverup of these murders. He wouldn't debate anyone because he knows he would lose -- he would be crushed. Pathetic piece of crap he is.
QUOTE (madtruth @ Apr 5 2009, 10:36 AM)
That audio is great Rob, thanks for posting it.Meigs is a coward and an accomplice to the murders of 3,000 people for his involvement in the coverup of these murders. He wouldn't debate anyone because he knows he would lose -- he would be crushed. Pathetic piece of crap he is.
Yep!!!
apparently this is what makes mr.meigs qualified to debate science:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/11/b57/65
lol.
related article that surfaced during my research:
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=114979
*it should be noted that anyone can join linkedin.com for free and set up a profile, so there is no guarantee that page is authentic (even though it seems accurate). i mention this because i was able to verify that meigs attended dartmouth and that he was a 1980 graduate, along with his wife who also attended there http://unauthorized link.com/cd6a6a , with whom he wrote a book:
http://www.amazon.com/Make-Music-Video-Fir...s/dp/0531102157
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1208815.James_B_Meigs
i also found that he is alleged to be the editorial director for dartmouth's alumni magazine, by at least one person:
http://unauthorized link.com/c6korx
-but after extensive searches of dartmouth's site:
http://unauthorized link.com/d7derf http://unauthorized link.com/c4rvxf http://unauthorized link.com/cxerx4
-as well as google searches of the internet:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%...urriculum+vitae
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22James+Me...;hl=en&sa=2
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%...amp;btnG=Search
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22James+Me...;hl=en&sa=2
-i could not and did not find any official details about what he studied while attending dartmouth (nor any mention of him as an editorial director for dartmouth alum mag). aside from meigs' linkedin profile and bollyn's article (who probably used linkedin as his source), there is no record of what meigs studied at one of america's most expensive ivy league schools. but assuming he did indeed study 5 years of philosophy, imo meigs is unfit and unqualified to debate any scientific or technical data, especially with regard to 9/11.
ETA:
btw - i really have to add that im by no means excusing meigs or giving him a free pass. i think its awesome that you called him rob and tried to hold his feet to the fire. i didnt say it before, and i think it requires clarification, but regardless of his lack of proper qualified expertise, meigs has attempted to play the scientific authority on the matter of 9/11, and thus he should be made to answer for it. if you ever do get him on the phone or in person, present him with technical questions first and when he refuses to answer, then ask him how it is that BA in philosophy qualifies him to have any sort of "expert" opinion or insight on the events of 9/11.
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/11/b57/65
QUOTE
James Meigs
editor-in-chief at Popular Mechanics
Greater New York City Area
education:
Dartmouth College
BA, Philosophy, 1976 — 1981
editor-in-chief at Popular Mechanics
Greater New York City Area
education:
Dartmouth College
BA, Philosophy, 1976 — 1981
lol.
related article that surfaced during my research:
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=114979
*it should be noted that anyone can join linkedin.com for free and set up a profile, so there is no guarantee that page is authentic (even though it seems accurate). i mention this because i was able to verify that meigs attended dartmouth and that he was a 1980 graduate, along with his wife who also attended there http://unauthorized link.com/cd6a6a , with whom he wrote a book:
http://www.amazon.com/Make-Music-Video-Fir...s/dp/0531102157
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1208815.James_B_Meigs
i also found that he is alleged to be the editorial director for dartmouth's alumni magazine, by at least one person:
http://unauthorized link.com/c6korx
QUOTE (LouBrooks)
...The alumni board of directors was dropping by for final approval after all was finished, which concerned me a bit. But the alumni editorial director turned out to be James B. Meigs, editor-in-chief of Popular Mechanics, and he loved everything I did. Such magazines as PM have inspired me for as long as I can remember to build that plywood roadster in my basement and win the Indy 500 with it. So, in a way, we all had just a great great pie fight and a lot of fun. Here's to Prof. Wagstaff, and thanks to everyone at Dartmouth U.
-but after extensive searches of dartmouth's site:
http://unauthorized link.com/d7derf http://unauthorized link.com/c4rvxf http://unauthorized link.com/cxerx4
-as well as google searches of the internet:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%...urriculum+vitae
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22James+Me...;hl=en&sa=2
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%...amp;btnG=Search
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22James+Me...;hl=en&sa=2
-i could not and did not find any official details about what he studied while attending dartmouth (nor any mention of him as an editorial director for dartmouth alum mag). aside from meigs' linkedin profile and bollyn's article (who probably used linkedin as his source), there is no record of what meigs studied at one of america's most expensive ivy league schools. but assuming he did indeed study 5 years of philosophy, imo meigs is unfit and unqualified to debate any scientific or technical data, especially with regard to 9/11.
ETA:
btw - i really have to add that im by no means excusing meigs or giving him a free pass. i think its awesome that you called him rob and tried to hold his feet to the fire. i didnt say it before, and i think it requires clarification, but regardless of his lack of proper qualified expertise, meigs has attempted to play the scientific authority on the matter of 9/11, and thus he should be made to answer for it. if you ever do get him on the phone or in person, present him with technical questions first and when he refuses to answer, then ask him how it is that BA in philosophy qualifies him to have any sort of "expert" opinion or insight on the events of 9/11.
dartmouth has become an interesting college.
if you will study on it, i think that you will find that the "wingers" may have taken over its board of trustees.
i think it was at dartmouth where dinesh dsouza, with winger backing, started a fascist publication to counteract dartmouth's liberalism. i can assure you, dartmouth was never a liberal school.
dartmouth is a very curious college. any graduate of that school who becomes an information controller for the events of 11/09/01 needs to be tracked very thoroughly.
the notion of liberal "ivy league" colleges is as fraudulent as the "liberal" new york times, the washington post.
harvard is often thought to be liberal. it never was. isn't.
most ivy league colleges border on the reactionary fascist ideology. the most overt have been princeton and yale.
if you think otherwise, then you have been procter&gambled...manipulated by public relations/advertising.
if you will study on it, i think that you will find that the "wingers" may have taken over its board of trustees.
i think it was at dartmouth where dinesh dsouza, with winger backing, started a fascist publication to counteract dartmouth's liberalism. i can assure you, dartmouth was never a liberal school.
dartmouth is a very curious college. any graduate of that school who becomes an information controller for the events of 11/09/01 needs to be tracked very thoroughly.
the notion of liberal "ivy league" colleges is as fraudulent as the "liberal" new york times, the washington post.
harvard is often thought to be liberal. it never was. isn't.
most ivy league colleges border on the reactionary fascist ideology. the most overt have been princeton and yale.
if you think otherwise, then you have been procter&gambled...manipulated by public relations/advertising.
Bumping this thread as it has come to my attention, Popular Mechanics have crawled out of their hole to "debate" Kevin Ryan on NPR later today.
I wonder if they will discuss the Flight Data?
Probably not.... as Kevin Ryan seems to think it supports the govt story. This is perhaps one of the reasons why Pop Mechs have agreed to "debate" him.
I wonder if they will discuss the Flight Data?
Probably not.... as Kevin Ryan seems to think it supports the govt story. This is perhaps one of the reasons why Pop Mechs have agreed to "debate" him.
Listening now, and this is infuriating. A two hour show, and Kevin Ryan was on for roughly five minutes. In addition, they had on TWO people AGAINST 9/11 truth. 
NPR, you guys are traitors!
NPR, you guys are traitors!
Well, i tried to call in, but got dropped or busy signals.
If the ZNY controller from ISP who called in is reading this, please contact us.
If the ZNY controller from ISP who called in is reading this, please contact us.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.