Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Debate By Calculations
Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum > Study > Debate
scott75
This point by Brian seemed technical enough to warrant posting here. I told him I simply can't evaluate the validity of his claim, but I have a feeling that people here can...


QUOTE (BrianGood)
Rob [Balsamo] refuses to do any work on the flyover flight path after the blast by... claiming it would be speculation. Given the limited range of available airspeeds at different locations, there is a certain limited range of flight paths that would be possible between the minimum-possible radius turns to the left and the right and the maximum possible climb. If Rob would simply tell us the minimum radius turn that a 757 can make at various possible airspeeds, we could map all the possible flight paths.

I believe the tightest radius turn I've ever seen Balsamo declare aerodynamically possible for a 757 is 5000 feet. Such a U-turn to the north would take the plane over restricted airspace near the White House. Such a U-turn to the south would take the plane directly over the airport runways. Either one would cross I-395 at a low altitude and would cross the Reagan National flight paths, attracting attention. Undetected flyover is impossible and I believe Rob's unwillingness to discuss the issue reflects his awareness of the fact that it's impossible.


QUOTE (BrianGood)
QUOTE (scott)
It seems that Rob has a fondness for things that can be calculated; I think he found that there were too many variables to properly calculate what would have happened to the plane once it arrived in pentagon airspace.


Not at all. There was a severely limited sector containing possible flight paths, given the limitations on mininum radius, ability to climb. This zone could be established. I suspect that the reason Rob doesn't want to do this is because he sees that a left turn heads inevitably into closed airspace near the white house and a right turn heads over the DCA runways, and straight ahead heads right over Bolling Air Force Base. None of these are viable flight paths for obvious reasons.


QUOTE (BrianGood)
QUOTE (scott)

I can convert things if I know the formulas, but first I need to know what to convert.


Miles per hour to feet per second. Find out how fast the plane goes to fly 800 feet from the impact site to Roosevelt's parking lot in ten seconds.
rob balsamo
Brian wants me to do calculations for him? lol.. .thats funny.

But, to answer your question which was already answered for Brian...

QUOTE
Further, why do you keep insisting the aircraft observed on the North Approach to be a 757? Do you have any Positive Identification that the aircraft as observed on the North Approach by numerous independently corroborated witnesses was a 757? When you provide such positive identification, we can get to the rest of your questions. You may wish to speculate, the rest of us stick to facts and data.

Bottom line, if you accept the North Approach, you must also accept the fact any type aircraft could have been used. We cover this in our presentation. Perhaps you missed it the first time. You may want to re-watch the analysis. Considering you missed the bank/speed calculations, it might be a good idea to take another look.

As for 757/737's using Runway 15 at DCA? Why not call the tower? 5200' seems adequate to me. Again, depending on weight, conditions of the day.. .etc. And no Brian, this also is not "pulling a fast one" on you. There are factors involved when dealing with airplane performance for any aircraft.



http://www.opednews.com/populum/page.php?a=96234#allcomments


Also see here...

And here is a hint of why I will never lift a finger for Brian.

QUOTE
QUOTE (Carol Brouillet)


Frankly Brian,



I don't think your attacks on me, Kevin Barrett, and William Rodriguez

have anything to do with Kevin Barrett or William Rodriguez or

anything rational. The attacks have to do with Brian Good and Carol

Brouillet and are completely emotional. You have a crush on me and

erroneously hold delusions about me. You are being irrationally

jealous of Kevin and William. You cannot accept the fact that I am

happily married and refuse to allow you to TRY to cause trouble

between my husband and I. Because of your delusions, I cannot ever

feel "safe" in your presence alone, and would rather not see you

again, but you are so desperate for attention that you are doing

extremely negative, destructive things- attacking me and respected

members of the 9/11 Truth Movement to force me to pay attention to

you.



Please stop attacking Kevin, William and I. Do something useful-

attack the people who did 9/11, not the people who are putting so much

effort into exposing the lies and stopping them. Leave me alone- stop

the email attacks on me and others. I think it probably harms your

reputation more than mine, although it is horrifically embarrassing to

me to think that at one time I thought of you as a friend. Now I only

see you as a threat to me, my family, the Northern California 9/11

Truth Alliance and the 9/11 Truth Movement. I have zero confidence in

your judgement and rationality.



Carol brouillet

Source


Scott, please stop posting by proxy. Especially from a lunatic like Brian Good.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2013 Invision Power Services, Inc.