You are a bit much. Your reaction to my difference of opinion about the blue tarp
was hysterical in both senses: it was an absurd overreaction and also makes you
look dumb! I hate to say it, but you have offered no evidence to substantiate the
claim that I am spreading "disinfo" about video fakery, for example. If you can't
prove your claim, you should withdraw it and apologize for being such a blowhard.
As for the Scholars breakup, I wanted a "big tent" approach, while Steve and his
buddies wanted to focus on thermite plus explosives, which does not appear very
promising to me. Thermite is not an explosive, so for thermite to be explosive, it
has to be combined with explosives. Why don't you reduce your ignorance about
all these things by reading some of the articles I have published about it? Read,
"Wikipedia as a 9/11 Disinformation Op" http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_6078.shtml
"The Misadventures of Kevin Ryan"http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/02/mi...kevin-ryan.html
There is a certain advantage to knowing what you are talking about. And I LOVE
this tactic of taking MY MILITARY SERVICE AND USING IT AGAINST ME! That
really tops the cake. I served as a commissioned officer in the USMC for four
years and resigned my commission to enter graduate school in 1966, where I
earned my Ph.D. in the history and the philosophy of science. And I have just
published my 29th book, THE PLACE OF PROBABILITY IN SCIENCE (2010)
What is there about me that leads you to suppose I am some kind of agent? I
have spent around twenty years doing research on JFK, including chairing or co-
chairing four national conferences and publishing three collections of studies by
experts on different aspects of the case. assassinationscience.com was my first
web site, where many of my articles on JFK are linked; and, in addition, I also
co-edit an on-line journal for advanced study at assassinationreseasrch.com.
Our research has exposed fraud in the evidence there, too, including that the
autopsy X-rays were altered to conceal a massive blow out to the back of his
head; that someone else's brains were substituted for those of JFK; and that
the home movie of the assassination, the Zapruder film, has been extensively
edited to conceal the true causes of his death. My most recent articles about
JFK are "The JFK 'Head Shot' Paradox", "Forrest Gump on the grassy knoll",
and "Who's telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?" Our research
has implicated the highest officials of the government in the assassination.
So if I am supposed to be some kind of agent, you might want to explain
why I have dedicated so much of my life to revealing truths and exposing
falsehoods about the assassination of JFK? It doesn't make a lot of sense
that I should be exposing governmental complicity there and yet serve as
an agent here. Let me offer an alternative explanation. It requires less
mental effort for you to spread false and malicious rumors about me than
it does to come to grips with the difficult issues I have been addressing.
The fault, deal Aldo, is in you, alas! Would you were not such a mediocrity.
QUOTE (Aldo Marquis CIT @ Feb 6 2011, 05:00 PM)
Thank you Aero and DYEW.
I am not trying to get into it with Fetzer. My guess is he wants the attention. I do not trust Fetzer at all. He's former military AND he has behaved irrationally with all of this known disinfo about no planes/video fakery at the towers and the divisive fallout of the Scholars group. He is too smart to be this gullible. I am sorry.
As pointed out, if you do not wish to discuss the Chandler/Cole article, please take it elsewhere. Preferably, off this forum entirely IMO.