hello,

just read 2 articles (of aug. 29th) on the bbc's website about 9/11 conspiracy theories and would like to share the fun with you.


part 1
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14665953
part 2
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14572054


don't forget to read the users' comments, which stopped at only 17 of them, comment section is now closed (after several hours into aug. 29th) and take note what the forum's admin let you know: "All posts are pre-moderated and must obey the house rules".

I spare my comment ....

Jesus.

"All comments: 751"

Editor's pick: 17"

One of the "editor's picks" says



Word!

Here we go again lets watch it and play spot the strawman argument.

have you, by any chance, been listening to the bebe concerning the libyan invasion.

straight out of orwell.

it continues to be an agitprop entity.

Oh yeah, using words like "rebellion" and "rebels". Like the Contra "rebels" in Nicaragua. Or the Mujahideen "rebels".

They're baying for the blood of the alleged Pan Am "bomber", Al-Megrahi, yet seem to have completely forgotten the deal made to release him.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6797118.ece

Nothing to do with the "42 billion barrels of oil reserves"

Since when was a war "not a war" when a country is attacked by air?