In my opnion, I believe the global warming claim is a hoax perpetrated for many reasons. That being said, the issue I am having difficuly is why the scientific community, while dismissing global warming, do not mention chemtrails. Anyone?
No Need to Panic About Global Warming
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405...1838421366.html
Full Version: No Need To Panic About Global Warming
that's an easy one. global warming as a concept is benign because it's based on all human action thus implying collective guilt. chemtrails on the other hand, well, it's chemicals and implies deliberate action on the part of some actor(s). collective guilt is palatable for the masses because it's nebulous. chemtrails presents an easily followed trail to the perps. all the necessary psyops/propaganda hasn't been fully implemented yet to assure no reprisals.
in a similar vein, firing squads from what i understand used to have one/some blanks to allow for some measure of doubt on the part of the shooter.
in a similar vein, firing squads from what i understand used to have one/some blanks to allow for some measure of doubt on the part of the shooter.
If i mention "chemtrails" in the wrong company, a tinfoil hat materializes upon my head, and all further discussion is lost.
Though, i find more and more people are becoming aware of them.
i was reading through the proposed municipal bylaws (in Canada) for my community. They are completely draconian, failure to comply, results in up to $10,000 per day fine.
Although it is written under the guise of carbon reduction and environmental sustainability, the regulations, and restrictions, involved with becoming an actual carbon reducer or environmental sustainer, are ridiculous. Solar panels have to be electrically inspected, only one windmill per property, and all sorts of new water and building restrictions.
From what i understand these new rules are "recommended" by the United Nations, and are probably being recommended to every community across the world, (in their planned human habitat zones)
Ugh.
Though, i find more and more people are becoming aware of them.
i was reading through the proposed municipal bylaws (in Canada) for my community. They are completely draconian, failure to comply, results in up to $10,000 per day fine.
Although it is written under the guise of carbon reduction and environmental sustainability, the regulations, and restrictions, involved with becoming an actual carbon reducer or environmental sustainer, are ridiculous. Solar panels have to be electrically inspected, only one windmill per property, and all sorts of new water and building restrictions.
From what i understand these new rules are "recommended" by the United Nations, and are probably being recommended to every community across the world, (in their planned human habitat zones)
Ugh.
QUOTE (lunk @ Feb 1 2012, 06:42 PM) 
If i mention "chemtrails" in the wrong company, a tinfoil hat materializes upon my head, and all further discussion is lost.
Though, i find more and more people are becoming aware of them.
i was reading through the proposed municipal bylaws (in Canada) for my community. They are completely draconian, failure to comply, results in up to $10,000 per day fine.
Although it is written under the guise of carbon reduction and environmental sustainability, the regulations, and restrictions, involved with becoming an actual carbon reducer or environmental sustainer, are ridiculous. Solar panels have to be electrically inspected, only one windmill per property, and all sorts of new water and building restrictions.
From what i understand these new rules are "recommended" by the United Nations, and are probably being recommended to every community across the world, (in their planned human habitat zones)
Ugh.
Though, i find more and more people are becoming aware of them.
i was reading through the proposed municipal bylaws (in Canada) for my community. They are completely draconian, failure to comply, results in up to $10,000 per day fine.
Although it is written under the guise of carbon reduction and environmental sustainability, the regulations, and restrictions, involved with becoming an actual carbon reducer or environmental sustainer, are ridiculous. Solar panels have to be electrically inspected, only one windmill per property, and all sorts of new water and building restrictions.
From what i understand these new rules are "recommended" by the United Nations, and are probably being recommended to every community across the world, (in their planned human habitat zones)
Ugh.
Try talking about Peak Oil with people and watch how fast people will shun you.
QUOTE (DoYouEverWonder @ Jan 31 2012, 11:14 AM)
Try talking about Peak Oil with people and watch how fast people will shun you.
sounds like you take peak oil as the gospel. do you ever ponder if that concept is also just another mind job?
i don't know if it is true or not, but it seems like the same people providing the data. from what i understand, there are capped wells, undiscovered fields, abiotic oil and tremendous amount of waste going on. cui bono?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.