In case anyone believes that Pilots determination that Flight 175 was over Pittsburgh, PA, at the time it was supposed to have been effortlessly entering the South Tower, was a turning point for me, I had reached that conclusion already in "New Proof of Video Fakery on 9/11", published in OpEdNews in 2008. What Pilots confirmed was simply another piece of the puzzle, not the proof some kind of video fakery had taken place in New York. Likewise, my earlier piece, "What didn't happen at the Pentagon", was published on rense.com and my blog back in 2010. Indeed, I have tracked down an earlier version that appeared on "The Daily Paul" back on 9 June 2009, http://www.dailypaul.com/95834/what-didn-t...at-the-pentagon
, So this suggestion that I was "piggybacking" on Dennis is simply absurd. And the idea that I was trading on Pilots late discover that Flight 175 was over Pittsburgh was the basis for my arguments about no planes and video fakery is equally absurd. I have been publishing about these subjects for years, where some of the most important studies related to the question are included in the references below.
Morgan Reynolds had to beat up on me for at least 18 months before I could even take seriously the very idea that no Boeings had hit either of the Twin Towers until I realized that video fakery was compatible with real planes, since the videos might have been altered to conceal something about the planes or their interaction with the buildings. At that point, I began to interview a series of students of 9/11 who had done serious research on this subject. I actually interviewed at least fifteen (15) of them, including going through their web sited and multiple videos (over and over) before I became convinced that fakery had to have taken place by Joe Keith's argument that, not only is the entry into the South Tower in violation of Newton's laws, but that, by a frame-by-frame advance, he and others had established that the "plane" had passed through its complete length into the tower in the same number of frames that it had passes through its own length in air--and that this was the case for both the Hezaranhi and Evan Fairbanks's videos. After that, I realized that anyone who denied something was wrong did not know the evidence.
Why mrmitosis would suggest "Of course, Fetzer has made a transparent and opportunistic attempt to use the article to bolster support for his own opinions…inviting people to explain why “we are wrong” (…who’s “we”?), and linking to previous articles which were primarily concerned with NPT and video fakery", on the one hand, and also remark, "Incidentally, Jim manages to restrain himself from mentioning NPT, or anything else exotic, in his introduction – why not, if this is one of the article’s core arguments? Why does he choose to wait for a discussion like this to raise NPT?" is simply ignorant. I had ALREADY PUBLISHED several articles about NPT, including "9/11: Planes/No Planes and 'Video Fakery'" on 20 February 2012, as well as the separate article about "The 9/11 Passenger Paradox" (with Dean Harwell) on 15 March 2012. Dennis and I had discussed them both and I thought it would be valuable to have someone of his background and experience address the Pentagon. So we put it together.
ON WHAT HAPPENED AT THE PENTAGON:
"What Didn't Happen at the Pentagon"http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/01/wh...t-pentagon.html
"Pandora's Black Box, Chapter 2"http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8...66571196607580#
Flight Data Expert Confirmation: No Evidence Linking FDR Data to
"Inside Job: Seven Questions about 9/11"http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/05/in...ions-about-911/
“9/11: The official account of the Pentagon attach is a fantasy” (with Dennis Cimino)http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/13/91...k-is-a-fantasy/
ON PLANES OR NO PLANES:
Elias Davidsson, "There is no evidence that Muslims committed the crime
of 9/11" http://www.opednews.com/articles/There-is-...100811-366.html
David Ray Griffin, "Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners"http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?con...a&aid=16924
Leslie Raphael, "Jules Naudet's 9/11 Film was Staged"http://www.serendipity.li/wot/naudet/raphael.htm
"New Proof of Video Fakery on 9/11"http://www.opednews.com/articles/New-Proof...080729-132.html
"9/11: Speeds Reported For World Trade Center Attack Aircraft Analyzed"http://pilotsfor911truth.org/wtc_speed
"Inside Job: More Proof of 9/11 Duplicity"http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/11/in...-911-duplicity/
"9/11: An Open Letter to Anthony Lawson about 'Absurdities'"http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/03/91...ut-absurdities/
Killtown on Shanksville,http://www.nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%2...02010%20Oct.mp3
Pilots for 9/11 Truth, “ACARS CONFIRMED – 9/11 Aircraft Airborne Long After Crash” (Flight 175), http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ACARS-CONFIRM...FTER-CRASH.html
Pilots for 9/11 Truth, “United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash – According to ATC/Radar”http://pilotsfor911truth.org/united-93-still-airborne.html
“9/11: Planes/No Planes and ‘Video Fakery’”http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/91...d-video-fakery/
“The 9/11 Passenger Paradox: What happened to Flight 93?” (with Dean Hartwell)http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/15/th...d-to-flight-93/