Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: WTC: Flights 11 & 175
Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum > Study > Library
Topic Introduction

No one knows much about the fate of flight 11 except for what the government has told us - the only footage of the North Tower being hit is the Naudette Brothers film, footage captured by French filmakers who were in New York making a documentary. Nothing but a blur can be seen. There is however a wealth of footage of the plane that struck the South Tower. Unfortunately it has generated few answers and much controversy.

The disagreements arise from the following anomolies:

The plane disappears into the south tower like a knife through butter, leaving a "plane-shaped" hole that some have compared to something out of a roadrunner cartoon. The problem should be obvious, the building's facade was framed in steel, it would seem that the plane's aluminum wings should have broken off or been mangled rather than slicing cleanly through the columns.

There appears to be non-standard equipment mounted underneath the plane, often refered to as a "pod". A flash of light can be seen just before the plane stikes the building. Some contend that something was fired into the building from this equipment, possibly to ignite the fuel, possibly to weaken the steel facade to allow the plane to enter without raining compromising evidence onto the street below. Others say this "pod" is merely an artifact of light and shadow.

Some wide angle footage shows the plane appearing in the sky mid-frame, or part of a wing dissapearing briefly, or shows no plane at all where other footage taken from a similar angle does show a plane. This has led some to assert that there was in fact no plane at all, that the image of a plane was inserted into news footage in near real-time. The technology to accomplish this does in fact exist, it is the same trick used to insert a CGI first-down line on the field during live broadcasts of football games.

There are others of course that believe the official version with regard to what hit the building, and there are yet others who believe that planes hit the towers though not necessarily flights 11 and 175, possibly drones guided in by remote control or beacon.

So take your pick - simple drones, planes with pods, or computer graphics. A word of advice - don't get too wrapped up in this, much of the evidence is contradictory, the issue practically begs for the offering up of disinformation to create discord within the movement (sometimes I think they are and that it's working), and, ultimately, we may never find out what really happened or how they did it. Does it really matter?

Rescue workers silenced after exposing 9-11 whitewash
by Greg Szymanski
American Free Press
A 9-11 rescue worker recently came forward to say he was told by FBI agents to “keep my mouth shut” about one of the “black boxes” a fellow firefighter helped locate at ground zero, contradicting the official story that none of the flight and cockpit data recorders were ever recovered in the wreckage of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers. Honorary firefighter Mike Bellone claims he was approached by unknown bureau agents a short time after he and his partner, Nicholas DeMasi, a retired New York firefighter, found three of the four “black boxes” among the WTC rubble before January 2002.
Posts and Threads

"AA 11" crash - Naudet video
thread started by Tarya, Oct 24 2006
Pilots' forum members take a critical look at the Naudette video and discuss the plausibility of the "No Plane Theory"

New Analysis Video Is Very Telling
Please Watch This 10 Minute Video

Thread started by CB_Brooklyn, Feb 26 2007
Discussion about news clips that suggest "flight 175" was CGI'd into footage
Other Resources
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2019 Invision Power Services, Inc.