In the spirit of DRG's latest book "Debunking 9/11 Debunking", i thought i would put together an article for those to help out with the most common so-called "Debunks" of our work.
1. Claim - There are No pilots at pilotsfor911truth.org
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html
All above names who are pilots certified by the FAA can be cross referenced here...
https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/
Pilots Question 9/11 (photos here)
http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html
2. Claim - The FDR Data stops/is missing 2-6 seconds of data west of the pentagon wall
FDR Recorders built to .5 sec lag maximum standard
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=7152
Radar Altitude Confirms too high
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=4801
NTSB plots aircraft 1 second away from pentagon wall.
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myp...1960/093744.jpg
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myp...0/jimritter.jpg
American 77 Flight Recorder Position Data - DME Video
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=10751
Lat/Long/DME
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...t&p=8305238
Putting Fdr "delay" Myth To Rest
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=13846
INS vs DME
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=15047
Added Oct 2009 - Newly Decoded Data Not Verified, Conflicts with NTSB Flight Path Study, and still shows too high to hit the Pentagon.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=18239
2a. Claim - The data file terminates at a point west of the Pentagon based on altitude correlation of the MC values recorded by the PLA and IAD radar facilities and the full set of DME data matched to the various VOR's used along the flight path.
FDR Positional/DME Data obtained from a file (RO2) which was decoded by software not intended for use with Aircraft Accident Investigation. Above claim ignores this point. Pilots For 9/11 Truth have not used RO2 for any official analysis published on our main site due to this point alone. Although, we have shown Radar Altitude from RO2 in conjunction with claims made still place the aircraft too high. See claim 3.
Above Radar data processed by a person with an extreme bias for the govt story, has made numerous math errors in the past regarding simple vector analysis and has been shown to be in error of their radar analysis. Above claimant does not know the difference between pressure and true altitude and has admitted a "large potential for human error" in his Radar plot/analysis. When invited for debate by a 3rd party moderator on above claim(s), P4T accepted, claimant refused.
"In general, the final AA77 data in the raw [radar] file differs materially from the processed file."
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....&p=10765222
"aa77" Final Approach Ground Speed Determination From The 84rades Radar Data, 84Rades and FDR data mutually INCONSISTENT?
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=15913
Altitude Correlation determined above based on primary RADES radar returns. NTSB states. "... the altitude estimates from these returns are subject to potentially large errors" when attempting to correlate primary RADES altitude data for Egypt Air 990.
Points within the RADES Data have the alleged AA77 in excess of 50,000 feet.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=13211
RADES Altitude Data is not reliable for correlating position.
Altitude Data impossible to correlate due to inoperative Mode C.
Nav 1 DME recorded 1.5 NM off DCA VOR. The above claim ignores this point.
American 77 Flight Recorder Position Data - DME Video
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=10751
DME Slant Range errors are ignored by above claim.
Repetitive DME returns in excess of regulation intervals in RO2 ignored by above claim.
INS Errors are ignored by above claim (AA77 RO2 positional data shows aircraft departing roughly 3,000 feet south of IAD Runway 30. Illustration - http://www.aa77fdr.com/readout2/LNTTTPos.jpg)
INS vs DME
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=15047
See Claim 2 for more information on "missing seconds".
3. Claim - There is altimeter lag in the animation and csv file due to flying outside the aircraft envelope.
Airdata Calibration and Measurement
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...p?showtopic=103
FDR Vertical Speed - Altimeter lag issues Addressed
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...hp?showtopic=73
Radar Altitude Confirms too High
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=4801
Reserved - more info forthcoming
4. Claim - The Information that P4T has analyzed may not be from the NTSB (P4T may have fabricated the information and claims it came from the NTSB)
csv file download and cover letters provided by Undertow
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...hp?showtopic=64
Raw data decode provided by Undertow
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=4574
Animation cover letters/envelope provided by Snowgrouch
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...p?showtopic=375
Animation cover letters provided by Mick Harrison
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=6205
Reserved - More forthcoming
Animation provided by Third party on google video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=65...=AA77+Animation
George Washington University NTSB Data
http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htm
NTSB FOIA Website
http://www.ntsb.gov/info/foia_fri.htm
NTSB FOIA Contact - Melba D. Moye
202-314-6000
NTSB FOIA Request form -
http://www.ntsb.gov/pubmail/pubmail.asp
5. Claim - The csv file and animation show a heading along the official flight path.
csv file heading does not line up perfectly with physical damage
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myp...gonASpaint1.jpg
American 77 Flight Path in 3D
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=8166
csv file was altered to show southern approach
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=5083
ThePentaCon
http://thepentacon.com
6. Claim - Pilots For 9/11 Truth has not provided all the data
We have provided all data which pertains to all published research and analysis that is not proprietary in nature. All information/data can be found on links above. The only information we cannot and do not provide is a proprietary Data Frame Layout which does not change our analysis in any way. Undertow can expand on this more when he sees this post.
7. Claim - Cover Letter Dated March 22, 2007 says Animation not "Official" that its a "working copy"
Animation cover letter provided by Mick Harrison
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=6205
Animation isnt the only information we have. We also have a Raw file and csv file (see above).
However, the cover letter states the animation "was not used for official purpose" which means it was never used in an investigation. It is an official copy since it was officially provided through the Freedom Of Information Act and from the NTSB. The NTSB notes in the cover letter that they want everything as accurate as possible when providing information through the FOIA, however they note one error which was made to the clock annotation. They do not account for any other possible errors regarding the animation in this cover letter.
Given the fact that all we really need is the last data point - we offer the following article.
FDR Recorders built to .5 sec lag maximum standard
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=7152
8. Claim -
The Flight Data Recorder was found in the Pentagon. How can it be too high?
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=7322
Can the Govt Get Their Story Straight? - Location of FDR
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/FDR_location_091607.html
Lies, Conflicting Reports, Cover-Up's
Location of American 77 Flight Data Recorder - Part II
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/location_2.html
9. Claim -
New Paper At The Journal Of 9/11 Studies - FDR Analysis Performed By Frank Legge and Warren Stutt
Warren Stutt Decode Shows Altitude too high to Impact Pentagon
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10778240
Vertical and Lateral Acceleration do not shows signs of "impact", proving Longitudinal Deceleration was not due to "impact" as speculated by Legge/Stutt
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10794146
Warren Stutt's admitted lack of expertise with respect to FDR Investigation
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10799563
RA - PA Correlation, proving the "Altitude Divergence" calculated by Legge/Stutt was due to RA measuring from an object higher than ground level. Fatal to the Legge/Stutt argument.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10794074
If Legge/Stutt "Altitude Divergence" calculations were correct, Aircraft would be slamming into the ground. IAD ILS RWY 01R Approach Analysis, Instruments required for IFR Flight Based on Regulation.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10793490
Calculations based on Stutt Theory with respect to RA Tracking Capability, proving Stutt's theory false.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10794159
More confirmation supporting RA Tracking Capability referenced is in fact a longitudinal velocity, and not the vertical velocity as speculated by Legge/Stutt
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803407
Explains Lack Of Attention To Detail in the very first paragraph of the Legge/Stutt "Paper"
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10793061
Proof of Legge trying to weasel his way out of mis/disinformation he has presented
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10793501
A Response To Frank Legge And Warren Stutt, P4T rebuttal to Legge/Stutt "Paper" and "Rebuttal"
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=21025
Warren Stutt Refuses to Address the tough questions
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803075
Legge/Stutt Admit to Leaving Erroneous References in their paper as a "Honey Pot" trap for readers
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803456
More statements from FDR Expert Dennis Ciminio
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803408
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803429
Cit Publishes Response To David Chandler & Jonathan Cole's Joint Statement About The 9/11 Pentagon Attack
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=21054
These are some of the most common arguments when discussing Pilots For 9/11 Truth analysis regarding the information provided by the NTSB. In order to copy and paste whole links (you will get broken links from a direct copy/paste), please click quote (quote this post), copy and paste the whole quote box below to the site you wish to reply. I will add common arguments as they arise. Hope this is helpful.